ScalingStacks

Verified tagged author-source HTML · 2007.01384v1 · cited publication edition alignment unverified.

00A6

Proof. Let ‖⋅‖F​S\left\lVert\cdot\right\rVert_{FS} be a NA Fubini-Study approximation of ‖⋅‖C​Y\left\lVert\cdot\right\rVert_{CY}, with potential difference less than ϵ/2\epsilon/2. We construct the Fubini-Study metrics ‖⋅‖F​S,t\left\lVert\cdot\right\rVert_{FS,t} on (Xt,L)(X_{t},L) by the formula (10), so the curvature forms of ‖⋅‖F​S,t1/|log⁡|t||\left\lVert\cdot\right\rVert_{FS,t}^{1/|\log|t||} define the Kähler metrics ωF​S,t\omega_{FS,t} on (Xt,1|log⁡|t||​c1​(L))(X_{t},\frac{1}{|\log|t||}c_{1}(L)). By construction, for sufficiently small tt the local potentials are C0C^{0}-close to that of ‖⋅‖F​S\left\lVert\cdot\right\rVert_{FS}, which is ϵ\epsilon-close to the continuous metric ‖⋅‖C​Y\left\lVert\cdot\right\rVert_{CY}, so the uniform boundedness of the potentials can be guaranteed.

By our NA MA-real MA comparison assumption, over Int​(ΔJ)\text{Int}(\Delta_{J}) the potential ϕ0\phi_{0} of ‖⋅‖C​Y\left\lVert\cdot\right\rVert_{CY} equals the pullback ϕ0∘r𝒳\phi_{0}\circ r_{\mathcal{X}} via the retraction map r𝒳r_{\mathcal{X}}. From our discussions on the hybrid topology in section 3.2, over Int​(ΔJ)\text{Int}(\Delta_{J}), for ϕJ,t\phi_{J,t} to be C0C^{0}-close to ϕ0∘r𝒳\phi_{0}\circ r_{\mathcal{X}} means the same as saying ϕJ,t\phi_{J,t} is C0C^{0}-close to ϕ0∘Log𝒳\phi_{0}\circ\text{Log}_{\mathcal{X}}.

∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.