ScalingStacks

Verified tagged author-source HTML · 2007.01384v1 · cited publication edition alignment unverified.

For the complex geometric interpretation, we assume as usual XKX_{K} is the base change of an algebraic degeneration family XX, with an ample polarisation line bundle LL. For any given NA Fubini-Study metric (9), we can associate a family of Fubini-Study metrics on (Xt,L)(X_{t},L):

‖s‖F​S,t​(z)=|s⁡(z)|{{∑j|sj(z,t)|2|t|2​log⁡‖sj‖V}1/2​m,∀z∈Xt.\left\lVert s\right\rVert_{FS,t}(z)=\frac{|s(z)|}{\{\{\sum_{j}|s_{j}(z,t)|^{2}|t|^{2\log\left\lVert s_{j}\right\rVert_{V}}\}^{1/2m}},\quad\forall z\in X_{t}. (10)

Here sjs_{j} make sense for finite tt because they are selected as finite Laurent polynomials in tt. By our dictionary, we should consider the limit of ‖s‖F​S,t1/|log⁡|t||\left\lVert s\right\rVert_{FS,t}^{1/|\log|t||} as t→0t\to 0. Since

0≤log⁡(∑j|sj|2​|t|2​log⁡‖sj‖V)1/2−log⁡maxj|sj||t|log⁡‖sj‖V≤log⁡(N+1),0\leq\log(\sum_{j}|s_{j}|^{2}|t|^{2\log{\left\lVert s_{j}\right\rVert_{V}}})^{1/2}-\log\max_{j}|s_{j}||t|^{\log\left\lVert s_{j}\right\rVert_{V}}\leq\log(N+1),

in the limit the difference between maximum and square length disappears, so ‖s‖F​S,t1/|log⁡|t||\left\lVert s\right\rVert_{FS,t}^{1/|\log|t||} converges to (9) in the hybrid topology on X⊔XKa​nX\sqcup X_{K}^{an}.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.