ScalingStacks

Verified tagged author-source HTML · 2007.01384v1 · cited publication edition alignment unverified.

5.3 Conjectural meaning of NA MA II

In this section we will speculate on the concrete meaning of the Boucksom-Favre-Jonsson solution to the NA Calabi conjecture (cf. section 3.5). Let (X,L)(X,L) be a polarized algebraic degeneration family of Calabi-Yau manifolds, which needs not be a maximal degeneration. Let (𝒳,ℒ)(\mathcal{X},\mathcal{L}) be a semistable snc model. An analogue of the Lebesgue measure dμ0=limt→0Log𝒳∗dμtd\mu_{0}=\lim_{t\to 0}\text{Log}_{\mathcal{X}*}d\mu_{t} exists in this setting, which is supported on the essential skeleton S​k​(X)⊂Δ𝒳Sk(X)\subset\Delta_{\mathcal{X}}. It can be found by the ideas outlined in section 3.1. To describe it, denote m=dimS​k​(X)m=\dim Sk(X), and ΔJ\Delta_{J} be any mm-dimensional face of S​k​(X)Sk(X), corresponding to EJ=∩0mEjE_{J}=\cap_{0}^{m}E_{j} with local defining functions z0,…​zmz_{0},\ldots z_{m}. The holomorphic volume form Ω\Omega on 𝒳\mathcal{X} induces a holomorphic volume form on EJE_{J}, called its Poincaré residue ResEJ​(Ω)\text{Res}_{E_{J}}(\Omega), determined by the equality in K𝒳|EJK_{\mathcal{X}}|_{E_{J}}:

Ω=ResEJ​(Ω)∧t​d​log⁡z0∧…​d​log⁡zm.\Omega=\text{Res}_{E_{J}}(\Omega)\wedge td\log z_{0}\wedge\ldots d\log z_{m}.

This is independent of the choice of local coordinates ziz_{i}. Then up to normalising Ω\Omega by a global multiplicative constant, on the interior of ΔJ\Delta_{J},

d​μ0=|d​x1​…​d​xm|⋅∫EJ−1(n−m)2​ResEJ​(Ω)∧ResEJ​(Ω)¯,d\mu_{0}=|dx_{1}\ldots dx_{m}|\cdot\int_{E_{J}}\sqrt{-1}^{(n-m)^{2}}\text{Res}_{E_{J}}(\Omega)\wedge\overline{\text{Res}_{E_{J}}(\Omega)}, (16)

Notice it is proportional to |d​x1​…​d​xm||dx_{1}\ldots dx_{m}|, which explains the name ‘Lebesgue measure’. The union of the mm-dimensional open faces of S​k​(X)Sk(X) has the full d​μ0d\mu_{0}-measure, which is one by our normalisation.

We are interested in the distinguished solution ‖⋅‖C​Y=‖⋅‖ℒ​e−ϕ0\left\lVert\cdot\right\rVert_{CY}=\left\lVert\cdot\right\rVert_{\mathcal{L}}e^{-\phi_{0}} to the NA MA equation on (XKa​n,L)(X_{K}^{an},L) defined by

M​A​(‖⋅‖C​Y)=(Ln)​d​μ0.MA(\left\lVert\cdot\right\rVert_{CY})=(L^{n})d\mu_{0}. (17)

To give an interpretation, we boldly assume that ϕ0=ϕ0∘r𝒳\phi_{0}=\phi_{0}\circ r_{\mathcal{X}}, which can be regarded as a strong version of the comparison property. Then we are in the setting of section 5.2.

We begin with the interior of mm-dimensional faces of S​k​(X)Sk(X), which can be viewed as the generic region. Comparing with the heuristic formula (15), and making regularity assumptions on ϕ0\phi_{0}, we deduce a second order PDE

det(D2​ϕ0)​(𝒟J​(x,‖⋅‖C​Y)n−m⋅EJ)=(Ln)m!​∫EJ−1(n−m)2​ResEJ​(Ω)∧ResEJ​(Ω)¯,\det(D^{2}\phi_{0})(\mathcal{D}_{J}(x,\left\lVert\cdot\right\rVert_{CY})^{n-m}\cdot E_{J})=\frac{(L^{n})}{m!}\int_{E_{J}}\sqrt{-1}^{(n-m)^{2}}\text{Res}_{E_{J}}(\Omega)\wedge\overline{\text{Res}_{E_{J}}(\Omega)}, (18)

where (𝒟J​(x,‖⋅‖C​Y)n−m⋅EJ)(\mathcal{D}_{J}(x,\left\lVert\cdot\right\rVert_{CY})^{n-m}\cdot E_{J}) defines a polynomial in the gradient of ϕ0\phi_{0}.

On any other face Int​(ΔJ)⊂Δ𝒳\text{Int}(\Delta_{J})\subset\Delta_{\mathcal{X}} of dimension pp, not necessarily on S​k​(X)Sk(X),

det(D2​ϕ0)​(𝒟J​(x,‖⋅‖C​Y)n−p⋅EJ)=0.\det(D^{2}\phi_{0})(\mathcal{D}_{J}(x,\left\lVert\cdot\right\rVert_{CY})^{n-p}\cdot E_{J})=0.

There are two obvious mechanisms for this to happen:

  • •

    We may have the homogeneous real MA equation det(D2​ϕ0)=0\det(D^{2}\phi_{0})=0. There is a basic mechanism for this: notice that the model choice 𝒳\mathcal{X} is not canonical, and one can blow up to obtain higher models. For simple blowups, either one subdivides an existent face, or one creates new faces. On any new face det(D2​ϕ0)=0\det(D^{2}\phi_{0})=0 is automatic, because ϕ0=ϕ0∘r𝒳\phi_{0}=\phi_{0}\circ r_{\mathcal{X}} implies that ϕ0\phi_{0} is independent of the new coordinate variable.

  • •

    We may have 𝒟J​(x,‖⋅‖C​Y)n−p⋅EJ=0\mathcal{D}_{J}(x,\left\lVert\cdot\right\rVert_{CY})^{n-p}\cdot E_{J}=0, which is an algebraic condition on the gradient of ϕ0\phi_{0}. The author speculates that this option happens for (m−1)(m-1)-dimensional faces on S​k​(X)Sk(X), and its role is to match the gradients when we cross from one mm-dimensional open face of S​k​(X)Sk(X) to another. In Remark 5.1 we suggest 𝒟J​(x,‖⋅‖C​Y)\mathcal{D}_{J}(x,\left\lVert\cdot\right\rVert_{CY}) may be a nef class on EJE_{J}, and our equation precisely says this class has zero volume. The birational geometric significance seems well worth investigating. We now discuss some of the simplest ways this mechanism could work:

00AR

Example 5.2. When n=mn=m, namely in the maximal degeneration case, for simplicity we consider an (n−1)(n-1)-dimensional face ΔJ\Delta_{J} of S​k​(X)Sk(X), such that there are only two nn-dimensional faces of Δ𝒳\Delta_{\mathcal{X}} containing ΔJ\Delta_{J}, and they both lie on S​k​(X)Sk(X). Then the degree condition 𝒟J​(x,‖⋅‖C​Y)⋅EJ=0\mathcal{D}_{J}(x,\left\lVert\cdot\right\rVert_{CY})\cdot E_{J}=0 imposes a matching condition on the gradient of ϕ0\phi_{0} across the (n−1)(n-1)-dim face.

We consider a very concrete local example where ℙ1≃EJ=∩1nEi\mathbb{P}^{1}\simeq E_{J}=\cap_{1}^{n}E_{i},

deg𝒪(Ei)|EJ=−di≤0,i=1,2,…n,∑1ndi=2,\deg\mathcal{O}(E_{i})|_{E_{J}}=-d_{i}\leq 0,\quad i=1,2,\ldots n,\quad\sum_{1}^{n}d_{i}=2,

and the two divisors E0,E∞E_{0},E_{\infty} intersect EJE_{J} transversely at 0,∞∈ℙ10,\infty\in\mathbb{P}^{1}, giving rise to the two nn-dimensional faces. All divisors are reduced. The complex geometric local model for 𝒳\mathcal{X} comprises of two charts ℂz0,…​znn+1\mathbb{C}^{n+1}_{z_{0},\ldots z_{n}} and ℂw0,…,wnn+1\mathbb{C}^{n+1}_{w_{0},\ldots,w_{n}}. On the first chart Ei={zi=0}E_{i}=\{z_{i}=0\} for i=0,1,…​ni=0,1,\ldots n, and z0z_{0} is the affine coordinate on ℙ1∖{∞}\mathbb{P}^{1}\setminus\{\infty\}. On the second chart Ei={wi=0}E_{i}=\{w_{i}=0\} for i=1,…​ni=1,\ldots n, E∞={w0=0}E_{\infty}=\{w_{0}=0\}, and w0w_{0} is the affine coordinate on ℙ1∖{0}\mathbb{P}^{1}\setminus\{0\}. The transition on the overlap is

w0=z0−1,wi=ziz0di,i=1,2,…n.w_{0}=z_{0}^{-1},\quad w_{i}=z_{i}z_{0}^{d_{i}},\quad i=1,2,\ldots n.

The holomorphic volume form Ω∼d​z0∧…​d​zn=−d​w0∧…​d​wn\Omega\sim dz_{0}\wedge\ldots dz_{n}=-dw_{0}\wedge\ldots dw_{n}, and the coordinate t=z0​…​zn=w0​…​wnt=z_{0}\ldots z_{n}=w_{0}\ldots w_{n}. Locally on XtX_{t}

Ωt∼d​log​z1∧…​d​log​zn=−d​log​w1∧…​d​log​wn.\Omega_{t}\sim d\log z_{1}\wedge\ldots d\log z_{n}=-d\log w_{1}\wedge\ldots d\log w_{n}.

On the two nn-dimensional faces the coordinates are xi=log⁡|zi|log⁡|t|x_{i}=\frac{\log|z_{i}|}{\log|t|} and xi′=log⁡|wi|log⁡|t|x_{i}^{\prime}=\frac{\log|w_{i}|}{\log|t|} respectively, satisfying the linear constraints ∑0nxi=0\sum_{0}^{n}x_{i}=0 and ∑0nxi′=0\sum_{0}^{n}x_{i}^{\prime}=0, so we can eliminate xn,xn′x_{n},x_{n}^{\prime}. By adjusting ℒ\mathcal{L} we can make it zero in the local model. The potential ϕ0\phi_{0} satisfies the real MA equation on the two nn-dimensional faces:

det(∂2ϕ0∂xi​∂xj)0≤i,j≤n−1=const,det(∂2ϕ0∂xi′​∂xj′)0≤i,j≤n−1=const,\det\left(\frac{\partial^{2}\phi_{0}}{\partial x_{i}\partial x_{j}}\right)_{0\leq i,j\leq n-1}=\text{const},\quad\det\left(\frac{\partial^{2}\phi_{0}}{\partial x_{i}^{\prime}\partial x_{j}^{\prime}}\right)_{0\leq i,j\leq n-1}=\text{const},

and the problem is to match them on ΔJ\Delta_{J}. The complex geometry suggests that the domain of the coordinates xi,xi′x_{i},x_{i}^{\prime} can be extended outside the original nn-simplices, by the identificaton

x0′=−x0,xi′=xi+dix0,i=1,2,…n−1,x_{0}^{\prime}=-x_{0},\quad x_{i}^{\prime}=x_{i}+d_{i}x_{0},\quad i=1,2,\ldots n-1,

and the real MA equation is satisfied also on ΔJ\Delta_{J}. In terms of gradients at x∈ΔJx\in\Delta_{J},

∂ϕ0∂xi′=∂ϕ0∂xi,i=1,…n−1,∂ϕ0∂x0′=−∂ϕ0∂x0+∑1n−1di∂ϕ0∂xi.\frac{\partial\phi_{0}}{\partial x_{i}^{\prime}}=\frac{\partial\phi_{0}}{\partial x_{i}},\quad i=1,\ldots n-1,\quad\frac{\partial\phi_{0}}{\partial x_{0}^{\prime}}=-\frac{\partial\phi_{0}}{\partial x_{0}}+\sum_{1}^{n-1}d_{i}\frac{\partial\phi_{0}}{\partial x_{i}}.

The first (n−1)(n-1) conditions merely mean the tangent derivatives along ΔJ\Delta_{J} agree. The normal derivative matching condition precisely says

𝒟J​(x,‖⋅‖)⋅EJ=∑1n−1di​∂ϕ0∂xi−∂ϕ0∂x0−∂ϕ0∂x0′=0.\mathcal{D}_{J}(x,\left\lVert\cdot\right\rVert)\cdot E_{J}=\sum_{1}^{n-1}d_{i}\frac{\partial\phi_{0}}{\partial x_{i}}-\frac{\partial\phi_{0}}{\partial x_{0}}-\frac{\partial\phi_{0}}{\partial x_{0}^{\prime}}=0.

From a different perspective, the zero degree condition explains why ℙ1\mathbb{P}^{1} can be invisible to the metric, so ϕ0\phi_{0} is allowed to remain smooth across Int​(ΔJ)\text{Int}(\Delta_{J}).

00AS

Example 5.3. For m=1m=1, consider a 00-dimensional face ΔJ\Delta_{J} of S​k​(X)Sk(X), such that there is a unique 11-dimensional face of Δ𝒳\Delta_{\mathcal{X}} containing ΔJ\Delta_{J}, and it lies on S​k​(X)Sk(X). The simplest possibility 𝒟J​(x,‖⋅‖C​Y)=0\mathcal{D}_{J}(x,\left\lVert\cdot\right\rVert_{CY})=0 imposes a Neumann-like boundary condition on ϕ0\phi_{0}. This example may describe the Tian-Yau region in [25][42].

00AT

Example 5.4. For m=1m=1, consider a 00-dimensional face ΔJ\Delta_{J} of S​k​(X)Sk(X), such that there are two 11-dimensional faces of Δ𝒳\Delta_{\mathcal{X}} containing ΔJ\Delta_{J}, and they both lie on S​k​(X)Sk(X). A very simple geometric situation is when EJE_{J} is the smooth total space of a possibly singular ℙ1\mathbb{P}^{1}-fibration over an (n−1)(n-1)-dim smooth variety DD, and the two 1-dimensional faces correspond to two disjoint sections EJ′,1,EJ′,2E_{J^{\prime},1},E_{J^{\prime},2} of the ℙ1\mathbb{P}^{1}-fibration, so EJ′,1≃EJ′,2≃DE_{J^{\prime},1}\simeq E_{J^{\prime},2}\simeq D. A natural way to make 𝒟J​(x,‖⋅‖C​Y)n⋅EJ=0\mathcal{D}_{J}(x,\left\lVert\cdot\right\rVert_{CY})^{n}\cdot E_{J}=0 and 𝒟J​(x,‖⋅‖C​Y)\mathcal{D}_{J}(x,\left\lVert\cdot\right\rVert_{CY}) nef for x∈ΔJx\in\Delta_{J}, is to ask 𝒟J​(x,‖⋅‖C​Y)\mathcal{D}_{J}(x,\left\lVert\cdot\right\rVert_{CY}) to be the pullback of a nef class on the base DD. We regard this nef class as the limiting element of 𝒟J​(y,‖⋅‖C​Y)∈H1,1​(EJ′,i)\mathcal{D}_{J}(y,\left\lVert\cdot\right\rVert_{CY})\in H^{1,1}(E_{J^{\prime},i}) as yy approaches xx from either of the 11-dimensional faces. Then the matching condition is naturally seen as the continuity of 𝒟J​(y,‖⋅‖C​Y)\mathcal{D}_{J}(y,\left\lVert\cdot\right\rVert_{CY}) across the 00-dimensional face. This example may be relevant for the Ooguri-Vafa type neck region in [25][42] (cf. [42, section 7.1]). The possibility for the ℙ1\mathbb{P}^{1}-fibration to develop nodal fibres is related to the monopole bubbling phenemenon in these papers.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.