ScalingStacks

Proof. [03K2]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

By definition, for any 𝒗≡(𝝎,𝝃¯+)\bm{v}\equiv(\bm{\omega},\bar{\bm{\xi}}^{+}),

(9.126) 𝒩⁡(𝒗)≡𝔉0​(tf⁡(−Qβ))−𝔉0​(tf⁡(−Qβ−Sd−​𝜼)).\mathscr{N}(\bm{v})\equiv\mathfrak{F}_{0}\Big(\TF(-Q_{\beta})\Big)-\mathfrak{F}_{0}\Big(\TF(-Q_{\beta}-S_{d^{-}\bm{\eta}})\Big).

and hence

(9.127) 𝒩⁡(𝒗1)−𝒩⁡(𝒗2)=𝔉0​(tf⁡(−Qβ−Sd−​𝜼2))−𝔉0​(tf⁡(−Qβ−Sd−​𝜼1)).\mathscr{N}(\bm{v}_{1})-\mathscr{N}(\bm{v}_{2})=\mathfrak{F}_{0}\Big(\TF(-Q_{\beta}-S_{d^{-}\bm{\eta}_{2}})\Big)-\mathfrak{F}_{0}\Big(\TF(-Q_{\beta}-S_{d^{-}\bm{\eta}_{1}})\Big).

Since 𝔉0:𝒮0​(ℝ3)→𝒮0​(ℝ3)\mathfrak{F}_{0}:\mathscr{S}_{0}(\mathbb{R}^{3})\to\mathscr{S}_{0}(\mathbb{R}^{3}) is a smooth map on the space of trace-free symmetric (3×3)(3\times 3)-matrices, there is some universal constant C>0C>0 such that

(9.128) |𝒩⁡(𝒗1)−𝒩⁡(𝒗2)|≤C​|d−​𝜼1∗d−​𝜼1−d−​𝜼2∗d−​𝜼2|≤C⁡(|d−​𝜼1|+|d−​𝜼2|)⋅|d−​(𝜼1−𝜼2)|.\displaystyle\begin{split}|\mathscr{N}(\bm{v}_{1})-\mathscr{N}(\bm{v}_{2})|&\leq C|d^{-}\bm{\eta}_{1}*d^{-}\bm{\eta}_{1}-d^{-}\bm{\eta}_{2}*d^{-}\bm{\eta}_{2}|\\ &\leq C(|d^{-}\bm{\eta}_{1}|+|d^{-}\bm{\eta}_{2}|)\cdot|d^{-}(\bm{\eta}_{1}-\bm{\eta}_{2})|.\end{split}

Multiplying by the weight function,

(9.129) ρδ,ν+1,μ(0)(x)⋅|𝒩(v1)−𝒩⁡(v2)|≤C⋅ρδ,ν+1,μ(0)​(x)⋅(|d−​𝜼1|+|d−​𝜼2|)⋅|d−​(𝜼1−𝜼2)|≤C⁡(ρδ,ν,μ(1)​(x)⋅(|d−​𝜼1|+|d−​𝜼2|))⋅(ρδ,ν,μ(1)​(x)⋅|d−​(𝜼1−𝜼2)|).\displaystyle\begin{split}\rho_{\delta,\nu+1,\mu}^{(0)}(x)\cdot|\mathscr{N}(v_{1})&-\mathscr{N}(v_{2})|\leq C\cdot\rho_{\delta,\nu+1,\mu}^{(0)}(x)\cdot(|d^{-}\bm{\eta}_{1}|+|d^{-}\bm{\eta}_{2}|)\cdot|d^{-}(\bm{\eta}_{1}-\bm{\eta}_{2})|\\ &\leq C\Big(\rho_{\delta,\nu,\mu}^{(1)}(x)\cdot(|d^{-}\bm{\eta}_{1}|+|d^{-}\bm{\eta}_{2}|)\Big)\cdot\Big(\rho_{\delta,\nu,\mu}^{(1)}(x)\cdot|d^{-}(\bm{\eta}_{1}-\bm{\eta}_{2})|\Big).\end{split}

Taking sup norms,

(9.130) ‖𝒩⁡(𝒗1)−𝒩⁡(𝒗2)‖Cδ,ν+1,μ0​(ℳ)≤C⁡(‖𝒗1‖Cδ,ν,μ1​(ℳ)+‖𝒗2‖Cδ,ν,μ1​(ℳ))⋅(‖𝒗1−𝒗2‖Cδ,ν,μ1​(ℳ)).\displaystyle\|\mathscr{N}(\bm{v}_{1})-\mathscr{N}(\bm{v}_{2})\|_{C^{0}_{\delta,\nu+1,\mu}(\mathcal{M})}\leq C\Big(\|\bm{v}_{1}\|_{C^{1}_{\delta,\nu,\mu}(\mathcal{M})}+\|\bm{v}_{2}\|_{C^{1}_{\delta,\nu,\mu}(\mathcal{M})}\Big)\cdot\Big(\|\bm{v}_{1}-\bm{v}_{2}\|_{C^{1}_{\delta,\nu,\mu}(\mathcal{M})}\Big).

By similar computations, we also have the estimate for the Hölder seminorm

(9.131) [𝒩⁡(𝒗1)−𝒩⁡(𝒗2)]Cδ,ν+1,μ0,α​(ℳ)≤C⁡(‖𝒗1‖Cδ,ν,μ1,α​(ℳ)+‖𝒗2‖Cδ,ν,μ1,α​(ℳ))⋅(‖𝒗1−𝒗2‖Cδ,ν,μ1,α​(ℳ)).\displaystyle\Big[\mathscr{N}(\bm{v}_{1})-\mathscr{N}(\bm{v}_{2})\Big]_{C^{0,\alpha}_{\delta,\nu+1,\mu}(\mathcal{M})}\leq C\Big(\|\bm{v}_{1}\|_{C^{1,\alpha}_{\delta,\nu,\mu}(\mathcal{M})}+\|\bm{v}_{2}\|_{C^{1,\alpha}_{\delta,\nu,\mu}(\mathcal{M})}\Big)\cdot\Big(\|\bm{v}_{1}-\bm{v}_{2}\|_{C^{1,\alpha}_{\delta,\nu,\mu}(\mathcal{M})}\Big).

So we obtain the effective estimate (9.125) for the nonlinear errors. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.