ScalingStacks

Proof. [02H7]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

The necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of the harmonic function hh is

(4.4) ∑j=182mj−4+2∑i=1nki=12​π∫∂𝕋σ∗dh=0,\sum_{j=1}^{8}{2m_{j}-4}+2\sum_{i=1}^{n}{k_{i}}=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{\partial\mathbb{T}_{\sigma}}{\ast dh}=0,

where 𝕋σ\mathbb{T}_{\sigma} denotes the complement of the union of small balls of radius σ\sigma centred at the punctures. Thus if (4.1) is satisfied, a harmonic function hh with the singular behaviour (4.2) does indeed exists and is unique up to the addition of a constant.

By Lefschetz–Poincaré duality H2​(𝕋∗)≃Hc1​(𝕋∗)H_{2}(\mathbb{T}^{\ast})\simeq H^{1}_{c}(\mathbb{T}^{\ast}). The latter group sits in a long exact sequence

0→H0​(𝕋)→ℤ2​n+8→Hc1​(𝕋∗)→H1​(𝕋)→0,0\rightarrow H^{0}(\mathbb{T})\rightarrow\mathbb{Z}^{2n+8}\rightarrow H^{1}_{c}(\mathbb{T}^{\ast})\rightarrow H^{1}(\mathbb{T})\rightarrow 0,

where ℤ2​n+8\mathbb{Z}^{2n+8} is generated by the 2​n+82n+8 punctures. Thus H2​(𝕋∗)H_{2}(\mathbb{T}^{\ast}) is (2​n+10)(2n+10)–dimensional and maps onto H2​(𝕋)H_{2}(\mathbb{T}) with kernel spanned by the classes of 2​n+82n+8 spheres centred at the punctures. Note that the sum of these 2​n+82n+8 homology classes vanishes.

Because of (4.2), 2​n+72n+7 of the 2​n+102n+10 integrality constraints on i2​π∗d​h\tfrac{i}{2\pi}\ast dh to represent the first Chern class of a line bundle are automatically satisfied since we chose 2​mj−4,ki∈ℤ2m_{j}-4,k_{i}\in\mathbb{Z}. The remaining 33 constraints can be reinterpreted in terms of the position of the punctures following the arguments in the proof of [9, Proposition 3.5]:

∑j=18(2​mj−8)​qj+∑i=1nki​(pi+τ⁡(pi))∈Λ.\sum_{j=1}^{8}{(2m_{j}-8)\,q_{j}}+\sum_{i=1}^{n}{k_{i}\,\big(p_{i}+\tau(p_{i})\big)}\in\Lambda.

Since the points qjq_{j} belong to the half-lattice 12​Λ\tfrac{1}{2}\Lambda this condition is automatically satisfied.

We have therefore proved the existence of a principal U⁡(1)U(1) bundle P→𝕋∗P\rightarrow\mathbb{T}^{\ast} endowed with a connection θ\theta with curvature ∗d​h\ast dh. Since 𝕋\mathbb{T} is not simply connected θ\theta is uniquely determined up to a flat connection, i.e. a point of the dual torus 𝕋^\hat{\mathbb{T}}. This concludes the proof of (i) and (ii).

By uniqueness up to the addition of a constant the harmonic function hh is τ\tau–invariant and therefore can be thought of as defined on 𝕋∗/τ\mathbb{T}^{\ast}/\tau. Since τ∗(∗dh)=−∗dh\tau^{\ast}(\ast dh)=-\ast dh, we can lift τ\tau (uniquely up to gauge transformations) to an involution τ~\tilde{\tau} of the circle bundle PP by requiring that τ~\tilde{\tau} acts simultaneously as τ\tau on 𝕋∗\mathbb{T}^{\ast} and as the standard involution on the circle fibres. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.