Proof. [02FD]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
Proof.
Let be a log resolution. Write . Since has simple normal crossings, at every there are local coordinates such that is described by the equation . Let be the divisor . We have: where is a Lebesgue measure on , hence the measure has finite mass near iff . Thus iff .
Let be the density of with respect to . Since is comparable to near , it follows that belongs actually to for some when is log terminal.
Let be the density of with respect to . We will see here below that is bounded but it might have zeroes on , hence is unbounded in general. However we will show that for small enough, hence it follows from Hölder’s inequality (as in the proof of lemma 3.2) that
if is small enough.
Fix and let be a local embedding of a neighborhood of . We consider the -forms on , where is a set of affine coordinates on . Observe that is comparable to 1111 11 Note that the formula for makes sense even if is not a local generator.. Since is a local generator at of , we have where is the germ of an holomorphic function at . Therefore is comparable to , hence is comparable to near .
The functions generate an ideal . Actually, the construction can be globalized to provide a coherent ideal sheaf cosupported on .
We may assume [Hi] that is a log resolution of , namely a log resolution of with the additional property that the ideal sheaf which is the ideal sheaf of generated by the family of holomorphic functions , satisfies where is a positive multiplicity attached to any exceptional divisor of .
In local coordinates near , is comparable to , hence It follows that for every relatively compact subset iff . ∎