ScalingStacks

Proof. [01YT]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

Given nn and v>0{\rm v}>0, assume no such ϵ\epsilon exists. Then there exists a sequence of spaces (Mjn,gj,pj)(M^{n}_{j},g_{j},p_{j}) such that |RicMin|≤ϵj→0|{\rm Ric}_{M^{n}_{i}}|\leq\epsilon_{j}\to 0, Vol⁡(B1​(pj))>v>0{\rm Vol}(B_{1}(p_{j}))>{\rm v}>0 and

dG​H​(B2​(pj),B2​(0j))<ϵj→0,\displaystyle d_{GH}\big(B_{2}(p_{j}),B_{2}(0_{j})\big)<\epsilon_{j}\to 0\,, (6.4)

where 0j∈ℝn−3×C⁡(Yj)0_{j}\in\mathds{R}^{n-3}\times C(Y_{j}) is a vertex but rh​(p)<1r_{h}(p)<1. After possibly passing to a subsequence,we have

B2​(pj)→B2​(0),\displaystyle B_{2}(p_{j})\to B_{2}(0)\,, (6.5)

where 0∈ℝn−3×C⁡(Y)≡X0\in\mathds{R}^{n-3}\times C(Y)\equiv X is a vertex. But if C⁡(Y)C(Y) has any point with rh​(x)=0r_{h}(x)=0, then there is a set of Hausdorff codimension 33 in XX which is not smooth. By the Hausdorff estimate of Theorem 1.1 this is not possible, so we must have that C⁡(Y)C(Y) is smooth. Thus, YY is a smooth manifold, and in fact, C⁡(Y)C(Y) is itself be smooth if and only if YY is the unit 22-sphere. Thus,

B2​(pj)→B2​(0n)⊆ℝn.\displaystyle B_{2}(p_{j})\to B_{2}(0^{n})\subseteq\mathds{R}^{n}\,. (6.6)

But now, we can apply the standard ϵ\epsilon-regularity theorem, to conclude rh​(p)≤1r_{h}(p)\leq 1, which is a contradiction. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.