ScalingStacks

Proof. [01YD]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

By Theorem 1.11, there exists a lower triangular matrix A∈G​L​(n−2)A\in GL(n-2) such that

u′=A∘u:B2​r​(x)→ℝn−2\displaystyle u^{\prime}=A\circ u:B_{2r}(x)\to\mathds{R}^{n-2} (4.5)

is an ϵ\epsilon-splitting. Let d​vgdv_{g} denote the Riemannian measure and set ω′≡d​u′1∧⋯∧d​u′n−2\omega^{\prime}\equiv du^{\prime 1}\wedge\cdots\wedge du^{\prime n-2}. Define the measure μ′\mu^{\prime} by μ′=(∫B2​(p)|ω|)−1​|ω′|​d​vg\mu^{\prime}=\Big(\int_{B_{2}(p)}|\omega|\Big)^{-1}|\omega^{\prime}|dv_{g}. Then

μ′=det(A)​μ.\displaystyle\mu^{\prime}=\det(A)\mu\,. (4.6)

In particular this gives us

μ′​(B2​r​(x))μ′​(Br​(x))=μ​(B2​r​(x))μ​(Br​(x)),\displaystyle\frac{\mu^{\prime}(B_{2r}(x))}{\mu^{\prime}(B_{r}(x))}=\frac{\mu(B_{2r}(x))}{\mu(B_{r}(x))}\,, (4.7)

and it is equivalent to show the ratio bound for μ′\mu^{\prime}. Now since u′u^{\prime} is an ϵ\epsilon-splitting we have the estimate

⨏B2​r​(x)||ω′|−1|≤C⁡(n)​ϵ.\displaystyle\fint_{B_{2r}(x)}|\,|\omega^{\prime}|-1|\leq C(n)\epsilon\,. (4.8)

Hence, we also have the estimate

⨏Br​(x)||ω′|−1|≤Vol​(B2​r​(x))Vol​(Br​(x))​⨏B2​r​(x)||ω′|−1|≤C⁡(n)​ϵ,\displaystyle\fint_{B_{r}(x)}|\,|\omega^{\prime}|-1|\leq\frac{{\rm Vol}(B_{2r}(x))}{{\rm Vol}(B_{r}(x))}\fint_{B_{2r}(x)}|\,|\omega^{\prime}|-1|\leq C(n)\epsilon\,, (4.9)

which of course uses the doubling property for the Riemannian measure. By combining the previous two estimates we get

(1−C​ϵ)​Vol​(Br​(x))\displaystyle\big(1-C\epsilon\big){\rm Vol}(B_{r}(x)) ≤μ′​(Br​(x))≤(1+C​ϵ)​Vol​(Br​(x))\displaystyle\leq\mu^{\prime}(B_{r}(x))\leq\big(1+C\epsilon\big){\rm Vol}(B_{r}(x))\,
(1−C​ϵ)​Vol​(B2​r​(x))\displaystyle\big(1-C\epsilon\big){\rm Vol}(B_{2r}(x)) ≤μ′​(B2​r​(x))≤(1+C​ϵ)​Vol​(B2​r​(x)).\displaystyle\leq\mu^{\prime}(B_{2r}(x))\leq\big(1+C\epsilon\big){\rm Vol}(B_{2r}(x))\,. (4.10)

Finally, by using the definition of μ′\mu^{\prime} we arrive at:

μ′​(B2​r​(x))\displaystyle\mu^{\prime}(B_{2r}(x)) =(∫B2​(p)|ω|​d​vg)−1​∫B2​r​(x)|ω′|\displaystyle=\Big(\int_{B_{2}(p)}|\omega|\,dv_{g}\Big)^{-1}\int_{B_{2r}(x)}|\omega^{\prime}|
≤(1+C⁡(n)​ϵ)​(∫B2​(p)|ω|​d​vg)−1​Vol​(B2​r​(x))\displaystyle\leq(1+C(n)\epsilon)\Big(\int_{B_{2}(p)}|\omega|\,dv_{g}\Big)^{-1}{\rm Vol}(B_{2r}(x))
≤C⁡(n)​(∫B2​(p)|ω|​d​vg)−1​Vol​(Br​(x))\displaystyle\leq C(n)\Big(\int_{B_{2}(p)}|\omega|\,dv_{g}\Big)^{-1}{\rm Vol}(B_{r}(x)) (4.11)
≤C⁡(n)​(∫B2​(p)|ω|​d​vg)−1​∫Br​(x)|ω′|\displaystyle\leq C(n)\Big(\int_{B_{2}(p)}|\omega|\,dv_{g}\Big)^{-1}\int_{B_{r}(x)}|\omega^{\prime}|
=C⁡(n)​μ′​(Br​(x)),\displaystyle=C(n)\mu^{\prime}(B_{r}(x))\,, (4.12)

which by (4.7) completes the proof. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.