ScalingStacks

Statements and objects

  1. Theorem 1.1 . [007L]
  2. Remark 1.2 . [007M]
  3. Theorem 1.3 . [007N]
  4. Theorem 1.4 . [007P]
  5. Remark 1.5 . [007Q]
  6. Acknowledgement . [007R]
  7. Lemma 2.1 . [007S]
  8. Proof. [007T]
  9. Lemma 2.2 . [007U]
  10. Proof. [007V]
  11. Lemma 2.3 . [007W]
  12. Proof. [007X]
  13. Proposition 2.4 . [007Y]
  14. Proof. [007Z]
  15. Remark 2.5 . [0080]
  16. Lemma 2.6 . [0081]
  17. Proof. [0082]
  18. Proposition 2.7 . [0083]
  19. Corollary 2.8 . [0084]
  20. Theorem 2.9 . [0085]
  21. Proof. [0086]
  22. Proof. [0087]
  23. Theorem 3.1 . [0088]

Verified tagged author-source HTML · 2006.16961v1 · cited publication edition alignment unverified.

Chapter content is preserved from the exact pinned author source and official arXiv HTML. Source inventories and hyperlinks are checked; mathematical review and dependency closure remain open.

Chapter 52

Uniform Skoda integrability and Calabi-Yau degeneration

Yang Li
August 24, 2026
Abstract

We study polarised algebraic degenerations of Calabi-Yau manifolds. We prove a uniform Skoda type estimate, and a uniform L∞L^{\infty}-estimate for the Calabi-Yau Kähler potentials.

1 Introduction

Let (Y,ω)(Y,\omega) be a compact Kähler manifold, and d​μd\mu be a measure on YY. We say (Y,ω,d​μ)(Y,\omega,d\mu) satisfies the Skoda type inequality, if for any Kähler potential u∈P​S​H​(Y,ω)u\in PSH(Y,\omega) normalised to supu=0\sup u=0,

∫Ye−α​u​𝑑μ≤A,\int_{Y}e^{-\alpha u}d\mu\leq A, (1)

where α,A\alpha,A are independent of uu. A prototype theorem is

007L

Theorem 1.1. [19] On a fixed compact Kähler (Y,ω)(Y,\omega), the Skoda type inequality holds for d​μ=ωnd\mu=\omega^{n}.

007M

Remark 1.2. Here the supremum of all such α\alpha is known as Tian’s alpha invariant, important for existence questions of Kähler-Einstein metrics.

We are interested in keeping track of these constants α,A\alpha,A as (Y,ω,d​μ)(Y,\omega,d\mu) varies. The main theme of this paper is that oftentimes the Skoda constants can be chosen uniformly for quite flexible choices of probability measures d​μd\mu, even when the complex structure degenerates severely. In the literature α\alpha is much studied (cf. [19][11]), and a very recent preprint [7] made aware to the author after the completion of this work contains a uniform estimate for both α,A\alpha,A in the related context of Kähler-Einstein manifolds.

Our main application is to algebraic degenerations of Calabi-Yau manifolds. We work over ℂ\mathbb{C}. Let SS be a smooth affine algebraic curve, with a point 0∈S0\in S. An algebraic degeneration family is given by a submersive projective morphism π:X→S∖{0}\pi:X\to S\setminus\{0\} with smooth connected nn-dimensional fibres XtX_{t} for t∈S∖{0}t\in S\setminus\{0\}. A polarisation is given by an ample line bundle LL over XX; the sections of a sufficiently high power of LL induces an embedding X→ℂ​ℙNX\to\mathbb{CP}^{N}, hence a Fubini-Study metric ωX\omega_{X} on (X,L)(X,L). For 0<|t|≪10<|t|\ll 1, a fixed choice of ωX\omega_{X} induces rescaled background metrics ωt=1|log⁡|t||​ωX|Xt\omega_{t}=\frac{1}{|\log|t||}\omega_{X}|_{X_{t}} on XtX_{t} in the class 1|log⁡|t||​c1​(L)\frac{1}{|\log|t||}c_{1}(L).

A model of XX is a normal flat projective SS-scheme 𝒳\mathcal{X} which agrees with π:X→S∖{0}\pi:X\to S\setminus\{0\} over the punctured curve. It is called a semistable snc model if 𝒳\mathcal{X} is smooth, the central fibre over 0∈S0\in S is reduced and is a simple normal crossing divisor in 𝒳\mathcal{X}. By the semistable reduction theorem [12, chapter 2], after finite base change to another smooth algebraic curve S′S^{\prime}, we can always find some semistable snc model for the degeneration family X×S(S′∖{0})X\times_{S}(S^{\prime}\setminus\{0\}). Everything here is quasi-projective.

We say the degeneration family is Calabi-Yau if there is a trivialising section Ω\Omega of the canonical bundle KXK_{X}. Over a small disc 𝔻t\mathbb{D}_{t} around 0∈S0\in S, this induces holomorphic volume forms Ωt\Omega_{t} on XtX_{t} via Ω=d​t∧Ωt\Omega=dt\wedge\Omega_{t}. The normalised Calabi-Yau measure on XtX_{t} is the probability measure

d​μt=Ωt∧Ω¯t∫XtΩt∧Ω¯t.d\mu_{t}=\frac{\Omega_{t}\wedge\overline{\Omega}_{t}}{\int_{X_{t}}\Omega_{t}\wedge\overline{\Omega}_{t}}. (2)

Our main result is

007N

Theorem 1.3. (Uniform Skoda estimate) Given a polarised algebraic Calabi-Yau degeneration family π:X→S∖{0}\pi:X\to S\setminus\{0\} as above. Then there are uniform positive constants α,A\alpha,A independent of tt for 0<|t|≪10<|t|\ll 1, such that for the normalised Calabi-Yau measures d​μtd\mu_{t},

∫Xte−α​u​d​μt≤A,∀u∈P​S​H​(Xt,ωt)​ with ​supXtu=0.\int_{X_{t}}e^{-\alpha u}d\mu_{t}\leq A,\quad\forall u\in PSH(X_{t},\omega_{t})\text{ with }\sup_{X_{t}}u=0.

This is proved by reducing to the semistable snc model case, and prove a general Skoda type estimate there (cf. Theorem 2.9). A major consequence, readily reaped using Kolodziej’s estimate (cf. Theorem 3.1), is

007P

Theorem 1.4. (Uniform L∞L^{\infty}-estimate) Let ϕt\phi_{t} be the Kähler potential of the Calabi-Yau metric in the class (Xt,[ωt])(X_{t},[\omega_{t}]), namely

(ωt+−1​∂∂¯​ϕ)n∫Xtωtn=d​μt,supXtϕt=0.\frac{(\omega_{t}+\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}\phi)^{n}}{\int_{X_{t}}\omega_{t}^{n}}=d\mu_{t},\quad\sup_{X_{t}}\phi_{t}=0.

Then ‖ϕt‖L∞≤C\left\lVert\phi_{t}\right\rVert_{L^{\infty}}\leq C independent of tt for 0<|t|≪10<|t|\ll 1.

007Q

Remark 1.5. Applications of pluripotential theory to Calabi-Yau metrics when the Kähler class is degenerating can be found in [9], which is used further in [20]. Our main results generalize certain aspects of [16] which focuses on degenerating projective hypersurfaces near the large complex structure limit.

007R

Acknowledgement. The author is a 2020 Clay Research Fellow, currently based at the Institute for Advanced Study. He thanks Song Sun and Simon Donaldson for discussions, and Sebastien Boucksom, Eleonora Di Nezza, and Valentino Tossati for comments.

2 Uniform Skoda inequality

We work in the context of semistable simple normal crossing (snc) models. Concretely, let π:𝒳→𝔻t\pi:\mathcal{X}\to\mathbb{D}_{t} be a flat projective family of nn-dimensional varieties over a small disc 𝔻t\mathbb{D}_{t}, such that the total space 𝒳\mathcal{X} is smooth, π\pi is a submersion over the punctured disc with connected fibres, the central fibre X0X_{0} is reduced and is an snc divisor in 𝒳\mathcal{X}. Denote the components of X0X_{0} as EiE_{i} with i∈Ii\in I. We equip 𝒳\mathcal{X} with a fixed background Kähler metric ω𝒳\omega_{\mathcal{X}}, inducing a distance function dω𝒳d_{\omega_{\mathcal{X}}}. This induces a family of rescaled Kähler metrics ωt=1|log⁡|t||​ω𝒳|Xt\omega_{t}=\frac{1}{|\log|t||}\omega_{\mathcal{X}}|_{X_{t}}. We shall derive a uniform Skoda type estimate (1) for (Xt,ωt,d​μt)(X_{t},\omega_{t},d\mu_{t}), where d​μtd\mu_{t} belongs to a natural class of measures. The main result is Theorem 2.9.

2.1 Quantitative stratification and good test functions

There is a quantitative stratification on any smooth fibre XtX_{t} induced by the intersection pattern of EiE_{i}: for J⊂IJ\subset I such that EJ=∩i∈JEi≠∅E_{J}=\cap_{i\in J}E_{i}\neq\emptyset, the corresponding statum is

EJ0={x∈Xt|dω𝒳(x,EJ)≲ϵ}∖{x∈Xt|dω𝒳(x,EJ′)≲ϵ, some J′⊋J},E_{J}^{0}=\{x\in X_{t}|d_{\omega_{\mathcal{X}}}(x,E_{J})\lesssim\epsilon\}\setminus\{x\in X_{t}|d_{\omega_{\mathcal{X}}}(x,E_{J^{\prime}})\lesssim\epsilon,\text{ some }J^{\prime}\supsetneq J\},

namely a small ‘ϵ\epsilon-tubular neighbourhood’ of EJE_{J} minus the deeper strata. For J={i}J=\{i\} we write Ei0=E{i}0E_{i}^{0}=E_{\{i\}}^{0}. Here the disc 𝔻t\mathbb{D}_{t} and the small parameter ϵ≪1\epsilon\ll 1 can be shrinked for convenience; the essential thing is that all parameters should be independent of the coordinate tt.

It is useful to introduce local coordinates {zi}0n\{z_{i}\}_{0}^{n} around EJ⊂𝒳E_{J}\subset\mathcal{X}, such that z0,…,zpz_{0},\ldots,z_{p} with p=|J|−1p=|J|-1 are the local defining equations of EjE_{j} for j∈Jj\in J, and locally the fibration map is t=z0​…​zpt=z_{0}\ldots z_{p}. Then up to uniform equivalence, locally

ω𝒳∼∑0n−1​d​zi∧d​z¯i.\omega_{\mathcal{X}}\sim\sum_{0}^{n}\sqrt{-1}dz_{i}\wedge d\bar{z}_{i}.

The rest of this section is devoted to the construction of good test functions. Given any of these divisors E0E_{0}, we can find a nonnegative function h=hE0h=h_{E_{0}} on 𝒳\mathcal{X}, such that

  • •

    In the local charts near E0E_{0} with z0z_{0} being the defining function for E0E_{0},

    h=|z0|2​h~​(z0,…​zn)h=|z_{0}|^{2}\tilde{h}(z_{0},\ldots z_{n})

    for some positive smooth function h~\tilde{h};

  • •

    Away from E0E_{0} the function hh is comparable to 1.

We observe

  • •

    The form ∂∂¯​log⁡h=∂∂¯​log⁡h~\partial\bar{\partial}\log h=\partial\bar{\partial}\log\tilde{h} extends smoothly;

  • •

    For |t|2≪h≲δ≪1|t|^{2}\ll h\lesssim\delta\ll 1 inside XtX_{t}, so that |z0|≫|t||z_{0}|\gg|t|, by a local calculation near EJE_{J} with 0∈J0\in J,

    −1​∂log⁡h∧∂¯​log⁡h∧ω𝒳|Xtn−1≥−12​|z0|2​d​z0∧d​z¯0∧ω𝒳|Xtn−1≳min⁡{1|z0|2,max1≤i≤p⁡|zi|−2}​ω𝒳|Xtn≳min{1h,h1/p|t|−2/p}ω𝒳|Xtn≳min{1h,h1/n|t|−2/n}ω𝒳|Xtn.\begin{split}&\sqrt{-1}\partial\log h\wedge\bar{\partial}\log h\wedge\omega_{\mathcal{X}}|_{X_{t}}^{n-1}\geq\frac{\sqrt{-1}}{2|z_{0}|^{2}}dz_{0}\wedge d\bar{z}_{0}\wedge\omega_{\mathcal{X}}|_{X_{t}}^{n-1}\\ &\gtrsim\min\{\frac{1}{|z_{0}|^{2}},\max_{1\leq i\leq p}|z_{i}|^{-2}\}\omega_{\mathcal{X}}|_{X_{t}}^{n}\\ &\gtrsim\min\{\frac{1}{h},h^{1/p}|t|^{-2/p}\}\omega_{\mathcal{X}}|_{X_{t}}^{n}\\ &\gtrsim\min\{\frac{1}{h},h^{1/n}|t|^{-2/n}\}\omega_{\mathcal{X}}|_{X_{t}}^{n}.\end{split}

    Here in the first line we need to fix δ≪1\delta\ll 1 so that the effect of ∂log⁡h\partial\log h is dominated by d​log⁡z0d\log z_{0}. The second line uses that for 1≤k≤p1\leq k\leq p, the volume forms on XtX_{t}

    1|z0|2​d​z0∧d​z¯0∧∏j≠k,1≤j≤n−1​d​zj∧d​z¯j∼1|zk|2​∏1≤j≤n−1​d​zj∧d​z¯j,\frac{1}{|z_{0}|^{2}}dz_{0}\wedge d\bar{z}_{0}\wedge\prod_{j\neq k,1\leq j\leq n}\sqrt{-1}dz_{j}\wedge d\bar{z}_{j}\sim\frac{1}{|z_{k}|^{2}}\prod_{1\leq j\leq n}\sqrt{-1}dz_{j}\wedge d\bar{z}_{j},

    and the third line uses |t|=|z0​…​zp|∼h1/2​|z1​…​zp||t|=|z_{0}\ldots z_{p}|\sim h^{1/2}|z_{1}\ldots z_{p}|.

  • •

    On XtX_{t} the function h≳|t|2h\gtrsim|t|^{2}. The region {|t|2∼h}⊂Xt\{|t|^{2}\sim h\}\subset X_{t} can be identified as E00E_{0}^{0}, namely the vicinity of E0E_{0} away from deeper strata. Here

    −1​∂log⁡h∧∂¯​log⁡h∧ω𝒳|Xtn−1≥0,−1​∂∂¯​log⁡h∧ω𝒳|Xtn−1≳−ω𝒳|Xtn.\begin{split}&\sqrt{-1}\partial\log h\wedge\bar{\partial}\log h\wedge\omega_{\mathcal{X}}|_{X_{t}}^{n-1}\geq 0,\\ &\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}\log h\wedge\omega_{\mathcal{X}}|_{X_{t}}^{n-1}\gtrsim-\omega_{\mathcal{X}}|_{X_{t}}^{n}.\end{split}
007S

Lemma 2.1. (Good test function) Given the divisor E0E_{0}, we can choose a C2C^{2} test function vv on XtX_{t} such that the following hold uniformly for small t≠0t\neq 0:

  • •

    vv is zero for h≥δh\geq\delta.

  • •

    Globally 0≤v≤−log⁡|t|0\leq v\leq-\log|t|.

  • •

    For any divisor EjE_{j} intersecting E0E_{0}, there is a subset of Ej0E_{j}^{0} with measure at least C2C_{2} on which −1​∂∂¯​v∧ω𝒳|Xtn−1≥C3​ω𝒳|Xtn\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}v\wedge\omega_{\mathcal{X}}|_{X_{t}}^{n-1}\geq C_{3}\omega_{\mathcal{X}}|_{X_{t}}^{n}.

  • •

    For C4​|t|2≤h≤δC_{4}|t|^{2}\leq h\leq\delta, the form −1​∂∂¯​v∧ω𝒳|Xtn−1≥0\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}v\wedge\omega_{\mathcal{X}}|_{X_{t}}^{n-1}\geq 0.

  • •

    For h≤C4​|t|2h\leq C_{4}|t|^{2}, the form −1​∂∂¯​v∧ω𝒳|Xtn−1≥−C5​ω𝒳|Xtn\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}v\wedge\omega_{\mathcal{X}}|_{X_{t}}^{n-1}\geq-C_{5}\omega_{\mathcal{X}}|_{X_{t}}^{n}.

007T

Proof. We seek the test function in the form v=Φ∘log⁡hv=\Phi\circ\log h for some convex, non-increasing, non-negative C2C^{2}-function Φ\Phi. Compute

∂∂¯​v=Φ′′​∂log⁡h∧∂¯​log⁡h+Φ′​(∂∂¯​log⁡h~),\partial\bar{\partial}v=\Phi^{\prime\prime}\partial\log h\wedge\bar{\partial}\log h+\Phi^{\prime}(\partial\bar{\partial}\log\tilde{h}),

so using the properties of hh above,

−1​∂∂¯​v∧ω𝒳|Xtn−1≥{(Φ′′C1′min{1h,h1/n|t|−2/n}+Φ′C2′)ω𝒳|Xtn,|t|2≲h≤δ,C3′Φ′ω𝒳|Xtn,h≲|t|2.\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}v\wedge\omega_{\mathcal{X}}|_{X_{t}}^{n-1}\geq\begin{cases}\left(\Phi^{\prime\prime}C_{1}^{\prime}\min\{\frac{1}{h},h^{1/n}|t|^{-2/n}\}+\Phi^{\prime}C_{2}^{\prime}\right)\omega_{\mathcal{X}}|_{X_{t}}^{n},\quad&|t|^{2}\lesssim h\leq\delta,\\ C_{3}^{\prime}\Phi^{\prime}\omega_{\mathcal{X}}|_{X_{t}}^{n},\quad&h\lesssim|t|^{2}.\end{cases}

To satisfy our conditions on vv, it is enough to have

  • •

    Φ⁡(x)=0\Phi(x)=0 for x≥log⁡δx\geq\log\delta.

  • •

    |Φ′​(x)|≲1|\Phi^{\prime}(x)|\lesssim 1 for 2​log⁡|t|≲x≤log⁡δ2\log|t|\lesssim x\leq\log\delta.

  • •

    −dd​xlog|Φ′|=Φ′′|Φ′|≥C4′max{h,h−1/n|t|2/n}-\frac{d}{dx}\log|\Phi^{\prime}|=\frac{\Phi^{\prime\prime}}{|\Phi^{\prime}|}\geq C_{4}^{\prime}\max\{h,h^{-1/n}|t|^{2/n}\} for h=ex≤δ,h=e^{x}\leq\delta, where C4′>C2′/C1′C_{4}^{\prime}>C_{2}^{\prime}/C_{1}^{\prime}. Morever, for x<δx<\delta, we need Φ′<0\Phi^{\prime}<0 so that −1​∂∂¯​v∧ω𝒳|Xtn−1\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}v\wedge\omega_{\mathcal{X}}|_{X_{t}}^{n-1} has some strict positivity for δ/2<h<δ\delta/2<h<\delta. Notice convexity of Φ\Phi is a consequence of these conditions.

To construct such Φ\Phi, we can prescribe the behaviour near x=log⁡δx=\log\delta by Φ′​(x)=−e1/(x−log⁡δ)\Phi^{\prime}(x)=-e^{1/(x-\log\delta)} for x<log⁡δx<\log\delta, and match this with a solution to

−dd​xlog|Φ′|=C4′max{ex,e−x/n|t|2/n},x<logδ-\frac{d}{dx}\log|\Phi^{\prime}|=C_{4}^{\prime}\max\{e^{x},e^{-x/n}|t|^{2/n}\},\quad x<\log\delta

for some large enough C4′C_{4}^{\prime}, such that Φ′\Phi^{\prime} remains C1C^{1} at the matching point. Integration shows that |Φ′||\Phi^{\prime}| remains uniformly bounded at h∼|t|2h\sim|t|^{2}, or equivalently x∼2​log⁡|t|x\sim 2\log|t|. ∎

2.2 Convexity

Consider u∈P​S​H​(Xt,ωt)u\in PSH(X_{t},\omega_{t}) normalised to supXtu=0\sup_{X_{t}}u=0. Equivalently, we can cover XtX_{t} by a bounded number of charts as before, and use the local potentials of ω𝒳\omega_{\mathcal{X}} to represent uu as a collection of local plurisubharmonic (psh) functions {uβ}\{u_{\beta}\} with |uβ−u|≤C|u_{\beta}-u|\leq C.

007U

Lemma 2.2. (Convexity) Let ϕ\phi be any psh function on the open subset of {1<|zi|<Λ,i=1,…p,|zk|<1,k=p+1,…n}⊂(ℂ∗)p×ℂn−p\{1<|z_{i}|<\Lambda,i=1,\ldots p,|z_{k}|<1,k=p+1,\ldots n\}\subset(\mathbb{C}^{*})^{p}\times\mathbb{C}^{n-p}. Then the function

ϕ¯​(x1,…​xn)=1(2​π)n​∫D​(1)n−p∏p+1n−1​d​zk∧d​z¯k​∫Tpϕ⁡(ex1+i​θ1,…​exp+i​θp)​d​θ1​…​d​θp\bar{\phi}(x_{1},\ldots x_{n})=\frac{1}{(2\pi)^{n}}\int_{D(1)^{n-p}}\prod_{p+1}^{n}\sqrt{-1}dz_{k}\wedge d\bar{z}_{k}\int_{T^{p}}\phi(e^{x_{1}+i\theta_{1}},\ldots e^{x_{p}+i\theta_{p}})d\theta_{1}\ldots d\theta_{p}

is convex.

007V

Proof. For any choice of θi\theta_{i} the function ϕ⁡(z1​ei​θ1,…​zp​ei​θn,zp+1,…,zn)\phi(z_{1}e^{i\theta_{1}},\ldots z_{p}e^{i\theta_{n}},z_{p+1},\ldots,z_{n}) is psh, since the TpT^{p}-action on (ℂ∗)p(\mathbb{C}^{*})^{p} is holomorphic. Thus the average function ϕ¯\bar{\phi} is also psh as a function of z1,…​zpz_{1},\ldots z_{p}. Any TpT^{p}-invariant psh function must be convex in the log coordinates, because for xi=log⁡|zi|x_{i}=\log|z_{i}|,

−1​∂∂¯​ϕ¯=14​∑∂2ϕ¯∂xi​∂xj​−1​d​log⁡zi∧d​log⁡zj¯≥0.\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}\bar{\phi}=\frac{1}{4}\sum\frac{\partial^{2}\bar{\phi}}{\partial x_{i}\partial x_{j}}\sqrt{-1}d\log z_{i}\wedge d\overline{\log z_{j}}\geq 0.

∎

2.3 Harnack type inequality

007W

Lemma 2.3. (Almost maximum on top strata) For u∈P​S​H​(Xt,ωt)u\in PSH(X_{t},\omega_{t}) normalised to supXtu=0\sup_{X_{t}}u=0, there is some i∈Ii\in I, such that

supEi0u≥−C,∫Ei0u​ω𝒳|Xtn≥−C′.\sup_{E_{i}^{0}}u\geq-C,\quad\int_{E_{i}^{0}}u\omega_{\mathcal{X}}|_{X_{t}}^{n}\geq-C^{\prime}.
007X

Proof. Let the global maximum of uu be achieved at q0∈EJ0q_{0}\in E_{J}^{0}, and denote the local potential of uu as uβu_{\beta}. Without loss of generality uβ≤0u_{\beta}\leq 0. We have uβ​(q0)≥−Cu_{\beta}(q_{0})\geq-C since |u−uβ|≤C|u-u_{\beta}|\leq C. Applying the mean value inequality around q0q_{0}, we find that the local average function u¯β\bar{u}_{\beta} produced in Lemma 2.2 satisfies supu¯β≥−C\sup\bar{u}_{\beta}\geq-C for another uniform constant CC. By the convexity of u¯β\bar{u}_{\beta} its sup is almost achieved at the boundary of the chart, which is contained in a union of less deep strata EJ′0E_{J^{\prime}}^{0} with J′⊊JJ^{\prime}\subsetneq J. Thus we can find a point q′q^{\prime} with u⁡(q′)≥−Cu(q^{\prime})\geq-C that belongs to a less deep stratum; an induction shows that there is some i∈Ii\in I, such that supEi0u≥−C\sup_{E_{i}^{0}}u\geq-C.

For the L1L^{1}-bound we recall the following Harnack inequality argument. Suppose a coordinate ball B⁡(q,3​R)B(q,3R) is contained in a local chart in a small neighbourhood of Ei0E_{i}^{0}. Applying the mean value inequality to the local psh function associated to uu, we see for y∈B⁡(q,R)y\in B(q,R) that

u⁡(y)≤C+−∫B⁡(y,2​R)u≲1+−∫B⁡(q,R)u.u(y)\leq C+\mathchoice{{\vbox{\hbox{$\textstyle-$ }}\kern-7.83337pt}}{{\vbox{\hbox{$\scriptstyle-$ }}\kern-6.11674pt}}{{\vbox{\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle-$ }}\kern-5.48965pt}}{{\vbox{\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle-$ }}\kern-5.31259pt}}\!\int_{B(y,2R)}u\lesssim 1+\mathchoice{{\vbox{\hbox{$\textstyle-$ }}\kern-7.83337pt}}{{\vbox{\hbox{$\scriptstyle-$ }}\kern-6.11674pt}}{{\vbox{\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle-$ }}\kern-5.48965pt}}{{\vbox{\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle-$ }}\kern-5.31259pt}}\!\int_{B(q,R)}u.

hence the Harnack inequality

−∫B⁡(q,R)|u|≲1+infB⁡(q,R)(−u).\mathchoice{{\vbox{\hbox{$\textstyle-$ }}\kern-7.83337pt}}{{\vbox{\hbox{$\scriptstyle-$ }}\kern-6.11674pt}}{{\vbox{\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle-$ }}\kern-5.48965pt}}{{\vbox{\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle-$ }}\kern-5.31259pt}}\!\int_{B(q,R)}|u|\lesssim 1+\inf_{B(q,R)}(-u).

Applying this to a chain of balls connecting any two points in Ei0E_{i}^{0} gives the L1L^{1}-bound ∫Ei0u​ω𝒳|Xtn≥−C′\int_{E_{i}^{0}}u\omega_{\mathcal{X}}|_{X_{t}}^{n}\geq-C^{\prime}; the bound is uniform because the number of balls involved in the chain can be controlled independent of tt. ∎

007Y

Proposition 2.4. (Almost maximum on top strata II) There is a uniform lower bound for all |t|≪1|t|\ll 1 and all i∈Ii\in I:

supEi0u≥−C,∫Ei0u​ω𝒳|Xtn≥−C′.\sup_{E_{i}^{0}}u\geq-C,\quad\int_{E_{i}^{0}}u\omega_{\mathcal{X}}|_{X_{t}}^{n}\geq-C^{\prime}. (3)
007Z

Proof. The L1L^{1}-estimate follows from the sup estimate as above, so the real problem is to transfer bounds between different Ei0E_{i}^{0}. This is nontrivial because the necks connecting Ei0E_{i}^{0} with each other are highly degenerate.

Given one divisor E0E_{0} such that ∫E00u​ω𝒳|Xtn≥−C,\int_{E_{0}^{0}}u\omega_{\mathcal{X}}|_{X_{t}}^{n}\geq-C, we produce a good test function vv by Lemma 2.1. Integrating by parts,

∫Xtv​−1​∂∂¯​u∧ω𝒳|Xtn−1=∫Xtu​−1​∂∂¯​v∧ω𝒳|Xtn−1.\int_{X_{t}}v\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}u\wedge\omega_{\mathcal{X}}|_{X_{t}}^{n-1}=\int_{X_{t}}u\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}v\wedge\omega_{\mathcal{X}}|_{X_{t}}^{n-1}.

The LHS is the difference of ∫Xtv⁡(ωt+−1​∂∂¯​u)∧ω𝒳|Xtn−1\int_{X_{t}}v(\omega_{t}+\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}u)\wedge\omega_{\mathcal{X}}|_{X_{t}}^{n-1} and ∫Xtv​ωt∧ω𝒳|Xtn−1\int_{X_{t}}v\omega_{t}\wedge\omega_{\mathcal{X}}|_{X_{t}}^{n-1}, and since −log⁡|t|≳v≥0-\log|t|\gtrsim v\geq 0 both terms are bounded between 00 and CC. Thus

|∫Xtu​−1​∂∂¯​v∧ω𝒳|Xtn−1|≤C.|\int_{X_{t}}u\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}v\wedge\omega_{\mathcal{X}}|_{X_{t}}^{n-1}|\leq C.

Now the form −1​∂∂¯​v∧ω𝒳|Xtn−1\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}v\wedge\omega_{\mathcal{X}}|_{X_{t}}^{n-1} can only be negative on {h∼|t|2}=E00\{h\sim|t|^{2}\}=E_{0}^{0}, and is bounded below by −C​ω𝒳|Xtn-C\omega_{\mathcal{X}}|_{X_{t}}^{n}. Thus the positive part of the signed measure u​−1​∂∂¯​v∧ω𝒳|Xtn−1u\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}v\wedge\omega_{\mathcal{X}}|_{X_{t}}^{n-1} has total mass controlled by ∫E00|u|​ω𝒳|Xtn≤C\int_{E_{0}^{0}}|u|\omega_{\mathcal{X}}|_{X_{t}}^{n}\leq C. Consequently, the negative part of the signed measure must also have total mass ≤C\leq C.

By construction, for any divisor EjE_{j} intersecting E0E_{0} there is a nontrivial amount of −1​∂∂¯​v∧ω𝒳|Xtn−1\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}v\wedge\omega_{\mathcal{X}}|_{X_{t}}^{n-1}-measure inside Ej0E_{j}^{0}. This forces supEj0u≥−C\sup_{E_{j}^{0}}u\geq-C. To summarize, we have transferred the sup bound from E00E_{0}^{0} to any Ej0E_{j}^{0} with Ej∩E0≠∅E_{j}\cap E_{0}\neq\emptyset. Since the central fibre X0X_{0} is connected, in at most |I||I| steps this sup bound is transferred to all Ei0E_{i}^{0} with i∈Ii\in I. ∎

0080

Remark 2.5. This proof is inspired by the intersection theoretic argument of [2, section 6.1], which can be viewed as a non-archimedean analogue.

2.4 Local L1L^{1} estimate

Given a local chart on EJ0E_{J}^{0} with ℂ∗\mathbb{C}^{*}-coordinates z1,…​zpz_{1},\ldots z_{p} and ℂ\mathbb{C}-coordinates zp+1,…,znz_{p+1},\ldots,z_{n}, and a point qq therein, we shall refer to the subregion

{12|zi(q)|≲|zi|≲2|zi(q)|,1≤i≤p}\{\frac{1}{2}|z_{i}(q)|\lesssim|z_{i}|\lesssim 2|z_{i}(q)|,\quad 1\leq i\leq p\}

as a log scale.

0081

Lemma 2.6. (Local L1L^{1}-estimate) Within every log scale there is a uniform bound on the L1L^{1}-average integral

−∫l​o​c|u|∏1p−1dlogzi∧dlogz¯i∧∏p+1n−1dzk∧dz¯k≤C.\mathchoice{{\vbox{\hbox{$\textstyle-$ }}\kern-7.98003pt}}{{\vbox{\hbox{$\scriptstyle-$ }}\kern-6.26338pt}}{{\vbox{\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle-$ }}\kern-5.6363pt}}{{\vbox{\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle-$ }}\kern-5.45924pt}}\!\int_{loc}|u|\prod_{1}^{p}\sqrt{-1}d\log z_{i}\wedge d\log\bar{z}_{i}\wedge\prod_{p+1}^{n}\sqrt{-1}dz_{k}\wedge d\bar{z}_{k}\leq C.
0082

Proof. We induct on the depth of the strata. For p=0p=0 this follows from Prop. 2.4. So let us assume the bound is achieved for depth <p<p. For a given chart, we consider the local psh function uβu_{\beta} associated to uu and produce the convex average function u¯β\bar{u}_{\beta} as in Lemma 2.2. Since a definite neighbourhood of the boundary of the chart lies inside less deep strata, we know that near the boundary |u¯β|≤C|\bar{u}_{\beta}|\leq C by the induction hypothesis and the convexity condition. Using convexity again in the interior of the chart we see |u¯β|≤C|\bar{u}_{\beta}|\leq C in the whole chart.

Within any log scale, by construction the local average −∫l​o​c(uβ−u¯β)=0.\mathchoice{{\vbox{\hbox{$\textstyle-$ }}\kern-7.83337pt}}{{\vbox{\hbox{$\scriptstyle-$ }}\kern-6.11674pt}}{{\vbox{\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle-$ }}\kern-5.48965pt}}{{\vbox{\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle-$ }}\kern-5.31259pt}}\!\int_{loc}(u_{\beta}-\bar{u}_{\beta})=0. But uβ≤Cu_{\beta}\leq C by u≤0u\leq 0, hence

−∫l​o​c|uβ−u¯β|≲−∫l​o​c(uβ−u¯β)+≤C.\mathchoice{{\vbox{\hbox{$\textstyle-$ }}\kern-7.83337pt}}{{\vbox{\hbox{$\scriptstyle-$ }}\kern-6.11674pt}}{{\vbox{\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle-$ }}\kern-5.48965pt}}{{\vbox{\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle-$ }}\kern-5.31259pt}}\!\int_{loc}|u_{\beta}-\bar{u}_{\beta}|\lesssim\mathchoice{{\vbox{\hbox{$\textstyle-$ }}\kern-7.83337pt}}{{\vbox{\hbox{$\scriptstyle-$ }}\kern-6.11674pt}}{{\vbox{\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle-$ }}\kern-5.48965pt}}{{\vbox{\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle-$ }}\kern-5.31259pt}}\!\int_{loc}(u_{\beta}-\bar{u}_{\beta})_{+}\leq C.

Using |u−uβ|≤C|u-u_{\beta}|\leq C we conclude the local L1L^{1}-estimate on uu. ∎

2.5 Local Skoda estimate

We recall a basic version of the Skoda inequality:

0083

Proposition 2.7. (cf. [22, Thm 3.1]) If ϕ\phi is psh on B2⊂ℂnB_{2}\subset\mathbb{C}^{n}, with ∫B2|ϕ|​ωEn≤1\int_{B_{2}}|\phi|\omega_{E}^{n}\leq 1 with respect to the standard Euclidean metric ωE\omega_{E}, then there are dimensional constants α\alpha, CC, such that

∫B1e−α​ϕ​ωEn≤C.\int_{B_{1}}e^{-\alpha\phi}\omega_{E}^{n}\leq C.

Applying this with Lemma 2.6,

0084

Corollary 2.8. (Local Skoda estimate) Within every log scale, there are uniform positive constants α\alpha and CC, such that

−∫l​o​ce−α​u∏1p−1dlogzi∧dlogz¯i∧∏p+1n−1dzk∧dz¯k≤C.\mathchoice{{\vbox{\hbox{$\textstyle-$ }}\kern-7.83337pt}}{{\vbox{\hbox{$\scriptstyle-$ }}\kern-6.11674pt}}{{\vbox{\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle-$ }}\kern-5.48965pt}}{{\vbox{\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle-$ }}\kern-5.31259pt}}\!\int_{loc}e^{-\alpha u}\prod_{1}^{p}\sqrt{-1}d\log z_{i}\wedge d\log\bar{z}_{i}\wedge\prod_{p+1}^{n}\sqrt{-1}dz_{k}\wedge d\bar{z}_{k}\leq C.

2.6 Uniform global Skoda estimate

We are interested in the following class of measures, motivated by Calabi-Yau measures (cf. section 3.1). Let aia_{i} be non-negative real numbers assigned to i∈Ii\in I, with min⁡ai=0\min a_{i}=0. Let

m=max{|J|−1:EJ≠∅,ai=0 for i∈J}.m=\max\{|J|-1:E_{J}\neq\emptyset,a_{i}=0\text{ for }i\in J\}.

We say the measures d​μtd\mu_{t} on XtX_{t} satisfy a uniform upper bound of class (ai)(a_{i}), if on the local charts of each EJ0E_{J}^{0},

dμt≤C|log⁡|t||m|z0|2​a0⋯|zp|2​ap∏1p−1dlogzi∧dlogz¯i∧∏p+1n−1dzk∧dz¯k.d\mu_{t}\leq\frac{C}{|\log|t||^{m}}|z_{0}|^{2a_{0}}\cdots|z_{p}|^{2a_{p}}\prod_{1}^{p}\sqrt{-1}d\log z_{i}\wedge d\log\bar{z}_{i}\wedge\prod_{p+1}^{n}\sqrt{-1}dz_{k}\wedge d\bar{z}_{k}. (4)

The normalisation factor ensures ∫Xtd​μt≤C\int_{X_{t}}d\mu_{t}\leq C independent of tt, by a straightforward local calculation.

0085

Theorem 2.9. (Uniform Skoda estimate) Suppose the measures d​μtd\mu_{t} on XtX_{t} satisfy a uniform upper bound of class (ai)(a_{i}). Then there are uniform positive constants α\alpha and AA, such that

∫Xte−α​u​d​μt≤A,∀u∈P​S​H​(Xt,ωt)​ with ​supXtu=0.\int_{X_{t}}e^{-\alpha u}d\mu_{t}\leq A,\quad\forall u\in PSH(X_{t},\omega_{t})\text{ with }\sup_{X_{t}}u=0.
0086

Proof. We choose the charts so that each point on XtX_{t} is covered by ≤C\leq C log scales. Summing over the local Skoda estimates from all log scales, ∫Xte−α​u​d​μt\int_{X_{t}}e^{-\alpha u}d\mu_{t} is bounded by

C|log⁡|t||m​∑log scales∫l​o​c|z0|2​a0​…​|zp|2​ap​∏1p−1​d​log⁡zi∧d​log⁡z¯i∧∏p+1n−1​d​zk∧d​z¯k≤C.\begin{split}&\frac{C}{|\log|t||^{m}}\sum_{\text{log scales}}\int_{loc}|z_{0}|^{2a_{0}}\ldots|z_{p}|^{2a_{p}}\prod_{1}^{p}\sqrt{-1}d\log z_{i}\wedge d\log\bar{z}_{i}\wedge\prod_{p+1}^{n}\sqrt{-1}dz_{k}\wedge d\bar{z}_{k}\\ &\leq C.\end{split}

∎

3 Application to Calabi-Yau degeneration

We work in the setting of polarised algebraic degeneration of Calabi-Yau manifolds, as in the Introduction.

3.1 Calabi-Yau measure

The Calabi-Yau measure (2) is studied thoroughly in [3], but it is illustrative to recall it explicitly on a semistable snc model 𝒳\mathcal{X}. The discussion is local on the base, and we will follow the notations of section 2, e.g. the components of the central fibre are denoted as EiE_{i} for i∈Ii\in I.

The canonical divisor K𝒳=∑iai​EiK_{\mathcal{X}}=\sum_{i}a_{i}E_{i} is supported on the central fibre, since KXK_{X} is trivialised. Multiplying Ω\Omega by a power of tt, which does not change d​μtd\mu_{t}, we may assume min⁡ai=0\min a_{i}=0. In the local coordinates around EJE_{J} away from the deeper strata,

Ω=fJ​∏0pziai​d​zi∧∏p+1nd​zj\Omega=f_{J}\prod_{0}^{p}z_{i}^{a_{i}}dz_{i}\wedge\prod_{p+1}^{n}dz_{j}

for some nowhere vanishing local holomorphic function fJf_{J}. Since t=z0​…​zpt=z_{0}\ldots z_{p},

Ωt=fJ​z0a0​…​zpap​∏1pd​log⁡zi∧∏p+1nd​zj,\Omega_{t}=f_{J}z_{0}^{a_{0}}\ldots z_{p}^{a_{p}}\prod_{1}^{p}d\log z_{i}\wedge\prod_{p+1}^{n}dz_{j},

hence

−1n2​Ωt∧Ω¯t=|fJ|2​|z0|2​a0​…​|zp|2​ap​∏1p−1​d​log⁡zi∧d​log⁡zi¯∧∏p+1n−1​d​zj∧d​z¯j.\sqrt{-1}^{n^{2}}\Omega_{t}\wedge\overline{\Omega}_{t}=|f_{J}|^{2}|z_{0}|^{2a_{0}}\ldots|z_{p}|^{2a_{p}}\prod_{1}^{p}\sqrt{-1}d\log z_{i}\wedge d\overline{\log z_{i}}\wedge\prod_{p+1}^{n}\sqrt{-1}dz_{j}\wedge d\overline{z}_{j}.

The total measure ∫Xt−1n2​Ωt∧Ω¯t\int_{X_{t}}\sqrt{-1}^{n^{2}}\Omega_{t}\wedge\overline{\Omega}_{t} is of the order O⁡(|log⁡|t||m)O(|\log|t||^{m}) where

m=max{|J|−1:EJ≠∅,ai=0 for i∈J}.m=\max\{|J|-1:E_{J}\neq\emptyset,a_{i}=0\text{ for }i\in J\}.

Thus d​μtd\mu_{t} satisfies a uniform upper bound of class (ai)(a_{i}) (cf. (4)).

3.2 Uniform Skoda estimate

We now prove the main theorem 1.3.

0087

Proof. First we observe that the choice of the Fubini-Study metric ωX\omega_{X} is immaterial. Given any two choices, the relative Kähler potential between them is bounded by O⁡(|log⁡|t||)O(|\log|t||) for 0<|t|≪10<|t|\ll 1, because the pole order of a section near t=0t=0 must be finite. Thus the relative Kähler potential between two choices of ωt\omega_{t} is bounded by O⁡(1)O(1) independent of tt, which affects the Skoda constant AA but not its uniform nature.

We now pass to a finite base change and find a semistable reduction. The Calabi-Yau measure d​μtd\mu_{t} on XtX_{t} is independent of the parametrisation of the base, and is preserved under finite base change. Thus it is enough to prove it assuming ωX\omega_{X} agrees with a smooth Kähler metric on a semistable snc model 𝒳\mathcal{X}; this is a special case of Theorem 2.9. ∎

3.3 Uniform L∞L^{\infty}-estimate

We recall the following result proved using Kolodziej’s pluripotential theoretic methods (cf. [16, section 2.2] for an exposition based on [8][9]):

0088

Theorem 3.1. Let (Y,ω)(Y,\omega) be a compact Kähler manifold, and the Kähler potential ϕ\phi solves the complex Monge-Ampère equation

(ω+−1​∂∂¯​ϕ)n∫Yωn=d​μ,supϕ=0.\frac{(\omega+\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}\phi)^{n}}{\int_{Y}\omega^{n}}=d\mu,\quad\sup\phi=0.

Assume there are positive constants α,A\alpha,A, such that the Skoda type estimate (1) holds for (Y,ω,d​μ)(Y,\omega,d\mu):

∫Ye−α​u​𝑑μ≤A,∀u∈P​S​H​(Y,ω)​ with ​supYu=0.\int_{Y}e^{-\alpha u}d\mu\leq A,\quad\forall u\in PSH(Y,\omega)\text{ with }\sup_{Y}u=0.

Then ‖ϕ‖C0≤C⁡(n,α,A)\left\lVert\phi\right\rVert_{C^{0}}\leq C(n,\alpha,A).

The uniform L∞L^{\infty}-estimate for the Calabi-Yau potentials in Theorem 1.4 is an immediate consequence.

References

  • [1] Błocki, Zbigniew. The Calabi-Yau theorem. Complex Monge-Ampère equations and geodesics in the space of Kähler metrics, 201–227, Lecture Notes in Math., 2038, Springer, Heidelberg, 2012.
  • [2] Boucksom, Sébastien; Favre, Charles; Jonsson, Mattias. Singular semipositive metrics in non-Archimedean geometry. J. Algebraic Geom. 25 (2016), no. 1, 77–139.
  • [3] Boucksom, Sébastien; Jonsson, Mattias. Tropical and non-Archimedean limits of degenerating families of volume forms. J. Éc. polytech. Math. 4 (2017), 87–139.
  • [4] Boucksom, Sébastien; Favre, Charles; Jonsson, Mattias. Solution to a non-Archimedean Monge-Ampère equation. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 28 (2015), no. 3, 617–667.
  • [5] Boucksom, Sébastien; Favre, Charles; Jonsson, Mattias. The non-Archimedean Monge-Ampère equation. Nonarchimedean and tropical geometry, 31–49, Simons Symp., Springer, [Cham], 2016.
  • [6] Demailly, Jean-Pierre; Pali, Nefton. Degenerate complex Monge-Ampère equations over compact Kähler manifolds. Internat. J. Math. 21 (2010), no. 3, 357–405.
  • [7] Di Nezza, Eleonora; Guedj, Vincent; Guenancia, Henri. Families of singular Kähler-Einstein metrics. arXiv:2003.08178.
  • [8] Eyssidieux, Philippe; Guedj, Vincent; Zeriahi, Ahmed. Singular Kähler-Einstein metrics. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 22 (2009), no. 3, 607–639.
  • [9] Eyssidieux, Philippe; Guedj, Vincent; Zeriahi, Ahmed. A priori L∞L^{\infty}-estimates for degenerate complex Monge-Ampère equations. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2008, Art. ID rnn 070, 8 pp.
  • [10] Gross, Mark; Tosatti, Valentino; Zhang, Yuguang. Collapsing of abelian fibered Calabi-Yau manifolds. Duke Math. J. 162 (2013), no. 3, 517–551.
  • [11] Guedj, Vincent; Zeriahi, Ahmed. Intrinsic capacities on compact Kähler manifolds. J. Geom. Anal. 15 (2005), no. 4, 607–639.
  • [12] Kempf, G.; Knudsen, Finn Faye; Mumford, D.; Saint-Donat, B. Toroidal embeddings. I. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 339. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1973. viii+209 pp.
  • [13] Kontsevich, Maxim; Soibelman, Yan. Homological mirror symmetry and torus fibrations. Symplectic geometry and mirror symmetry (Seoul, 2000), 203–263, World Sci. Publ., River Edge, NJ, 2001.
  • [14] Kontsevich, Maxim; Soibelman, Yan. Affine structures and non-Archimedean analytic spaces. The unity of mathematics, 321–385, Progr. Math., 244, Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, MA, 2006.
  • [15] Li, Yang. SYZ geometry for Calabi-Yau 3-folds: Taub-NUT and Ooguri-Vafa type metrics. arXiv:1902.08770.
  • [16] Li, Yang. SYZ conjecture for Calabi-Yau hypersurfaces in the Fermat family. arXiv:1912.02360.
  • [17] Li, Yang; Tosatti, Valentino. Diameter bounds for degenerating Calabi-Yau metrics. arXiv:2006.13068.
  • [18] Strominger, Andrew; Yau, Shing-Tung; Zaslow, Eric. Mirror symmetry is TT-duality. Nucl.Phys.B479:243-259,1996.
  • [19] Tian, Gang. On Kähler-Einstein metrics on certain Kähler manifolds with C1​(M)>0C_{1}(M)>0. Invent. Math. 89 (1987), no. 2, 225–246.
  • [20] Tosatti, Valentino. Adiabatic limits of Ricci-flat Kähler metrics. J. Differential Geom. 84 (2010), no. 2, 427–453.
  • [21] Yau, Shing Tung. On the Ricci curvature of a compact Kähler manifold and the complex Monge-Ampère equation. I. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 31 (1978), no. 3, 339–411.
  • [22] Zeriahi, Ahmed. Volume and capacity of sublevel sets of a Lelong class of plurisubharmonic functions. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 50 (2001), no. 1, 671–703.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.