ScalingStacks

Verified tagged author-source HTML · 2006.16961v1 · cited publication edition alignment unverified.

007X

Proof. Let the global maximum of uu be achieved at q0∈EJ0q_{0}\in E_{J}^{0}, and denote the local potential of uu as uβu_{\beta}. Without loss of generality uβ≤0u_{\beta}\leq 0. We have uβ​(q0)≥−Cu_{\beta}(q_{0})\geq-C since |u−uβ|≤C|u-u_{\beta}|\leq C. Applying the mean value inequality around q0q_{0}, we find that the local average function u¯β\bar{u}_{\beta} produced in Lemma 2.2 satisfies supu¯β≥−C\sup\bar{u}_{\beta}\geq-C for another uniform constant CC. By the convexity of u¯β\bar{u}_{\beta} its sup is almost achieved at the boundary of the chart, which is contained in a union of less deep strata EJ′0E_{J^{\prime}}^{0} with J′⊊JJ^{\prime}\subsetneq J. Thus we can find a point q′q^{\prime} with u⁡(q′)≥−Cu(q^{\prime})\geq-C that belongs to a less deep stratum; an induction shows that there is some i∈Ii\in I, such that supEi0u≥−C\sup_{E_{i}^{0}}u\geq-C.

For the L1L^{1}-bound we recall the following Harnack inequality argument. Suppose a coordinate ball B⁡(q,3​R)B(q,3R) is contained in a local chart in a small neighbourhood of Ei0E_{i}^{0}. Applying the mean value inequality to the local psh function associated to uu, we see for y∈B⁡(q,R)y\in B(q,R) that

u⁡(y)≤C+−∫B⁡(y,2​R)u≲1+−∫B⁡(q,R)u.u(y)\leq C+\mathchoice{{\vbox{\hbox{$\textstyle-$ }}\kern-7.83337pt}}{{\vbox{\hbox{$\scriptstyle-$ }}\kern-6.11674pt}}{{\vbox{\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle-$ }}\kern-5.48965pt}}{{\vbox{\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle-$ }}\kern-5.31259pt}}\!\int_{B(y,2R)}u\lesssim 1+\mathchoice{{\vbox{\hbox{$\textstyle-$ }}\kern-7.83337pt}}{{\vbox{\hbox{$\scriptstyle-$ }}\kern-6.11674pt}}{{\vbox{\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle-$ }}\kern-5.48965pt}}{{\vbox{\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle-$ }}\kern-5.31259pt}}\!\int_{B(q,R)}u.

hence the Harnack inequality

−∫B⁡(q,R)|u|≲1+infB⁡(q,R)(−u).\mathchoice{{\vbox{\hbox{$\textstyle-$ }}\kern-7.83337pt}}{{\vbox{\hbox{$\scriptstyle-$ }}\kern-6.11674pt}}{{\vbox{\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle-$ }}\kern-5.48965pt}}{{\vbox{\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle-$ }}\kern-5.31259pt}}\!\int_{B(q,R)}|u|\lesssim 1+\inf_{B(q,R)}(-u).

Applying this to a chain of balls connecting any two points in Ei0E_{i}^{0} gives the L1L^{1}-bound ∫Ei0u​ω𝒳|Xtn≥−C′\int_{E_{i}^{0}}u\omega_{\mathcal{X}}|_{X_{t}}^{n}\geq-C^{\prime}; the bound is uniform because the number of balls involved in the chain can be controlled independent of tt. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.