Proof of Theorem 1.1.
Assume that the conclusion is not
true. Then, for any fixed , there is a family of closed Ricci-flat Calabi-Yau
-manifolds with , and
such that
- i)
the injectivity radius and
the sectional curvature
|
|
|
- ii)
in
.
- iii)
for any open subset , wouldn’t
admit special lagrangian fibrations.
If we denote ,
, and
, then
|
|
|
and in
. By the Cheeger-Gromov’s convergence theorem (c.f. Theorem 2.1),
a subsequence of converges to a complete flat Calabi-Yau -manifold in the -sense,
i.e. for any , there are embeddings such that , and
(resp. and )
converges to (resp. and ) in the
-sense. Furthermore, . The soul theorem (c.f. [6], [29]) implies that there is
a
compact flat totally geodesic submanifold , the soul,
such that is isometric to the total space of the normal
bundle with a metric induced by and a natural
flat connection.
By Proposition (3.4), there is a finite normal covering with covering group such
that
- i)
is isometric to , where ,
is a lattice in , is the standard Euclidean metric on ,
and is the standard flat metric on induced by .
- ii)
The action of on is a product
action, i.e. there are -actions on and such that for any and .
Furthermore,
is -invariant, and .
- iii)
|
|
|
for any , and a constant
.
Note that the
-action on preserves , and,
, which implies that are
invariant, for any .
Lemma (3.3) shows in , for , which implies in , for any . By Remark (3.5), there are parallel 1-forms
on , which are pointwise linear
independent, and coordinates on such that
|
|
|
Hence Condition 4.1 is satisfied.
Let such that .
By Proposition (4.6), for , there is an open set
such that admits a equivariant special lagrangian fibration
of phase , where ,
i.e. there is a -action on ,
is a -equivariant map, and
|
|
|
for any . Hence induces a special lagrangian
fibration ,
which implies that admits a special lagrangian
fibration, and . It is a contradiction. We obtain the
conclusion.
∎