ScalingStacks

3. The blow-up limit [05DG]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

3. The blow-up limit

Let {(Mk,ωk,Jk,gk,Ωk)}\{(M_{k},\omega_{k},J_{k},g_{k},\Omega_{k})\} be a family of closed Ricci-flat Calabi-Yau nn-manifold with [ωk]∈H2​(Mk,ℤ)[\omega_{k}]\in H^{2}(M_{k},\mathbb{Z}), and pk∈Mkp_{k}\in M_{k}. Assume that

  • i)

    the injectivity radius and the sectional curvature

    igk​(pk)<1k,supBgk​(pk,1)|Kgk|≤1,i_{g_{k}}(p_{k})<\frac{1}{k},\ \ \ \sup_{B_{g_{k}}(p_{k},1)}|K_{g_{k}}|\leq 1,
  • ii)

    there is a σ≫1\sigma\gg 1 such that [Ωk|Bgk​(pk,σ​igk​(pk))]≠0[\Omega_{k}|_{B_{g_{k}}(p_{k},\sigma i_{g_{k}}(p_{k}))}]\neq 0 in Hn​(Bgk​(xk,σ​igk​(pk)),ℂ)H^{n}(B_{g_{k}}(x_{k},\sigma i_{g_{k}}(p_{k})),\mathbb{C}).

If we denote ω~k=igk−2​(pk)​ωk\tilde{\omega}_{k}=i^{-2}_{g_{k}}(p_{k})\omega_{k}, g~k=igk−2​(pk)​gk\tilde{g}_{k}=i^{-2}_{g_{k}}(p_{k})g_{k}, and Ω~k=igk−n​(pk)​Ωk\tilde{\Omega}_{k}=i^{-n}_{g_{k}}(p_{k})\Omega_{k}, then

ig~k​(pk)=1,supBg~k​(pk,k)|Kg~k|≤1k2,i_{\tilde{g}_{k}}(p_{k})=1,\ \ \ \sup_{B_{\tilde{g}_{k}}(p_{k},k)}|K_{\tilde{g}_{k}}|\leq\frac{1}{k^{2}},

and [Ω~k|Bg~k​(pk,σ)]≠0[\tilde{\Omega}_{k}|_{B_{\tilde{g}_{k}}(p_{k},\sigma)}]\neq 0 in Hn​(Bg~k​(pk,σ),ℂ)H^{n}(B_{\tilde{g}_{k}}(p_{k},\sigma),\mathbb{C}). By the Cheeger-Gromov’s convergence theorem (c.f. Theorem 2.1), a subsequence of (Mk,ω~k,g~k,Jk,Ω~k,pk)(M_{k},\tilde{\omega}_{k},\tilde{g}_{k},J_{k},\tilde{\Omega}_{k},p_{k}) converges to a complete flat Calabi-Yau nn-manifold (X,ω0,g0,J0,Ω0,p0)(X,\omega_{0},g_{0},J_{0},\Omega_{0},p_{0}) in the C∞C^{\infty}-sense, i.e. for any r>σr>\sigma, there are embeddings Fr,k:Bg0​(p0,r)⟶MkF_{r,k}:B_{g_{0}}(p_{0},r)\longrightarrow M_{k} such that Fr,k​(p0)=pkF_{r,k}(p_{0})=p_{k}, and Fr,k∗​g~kF_{r,k}^{*}\tilde{g}_{k} (resp. Fr,k∗​ω~kF_{r,k}^{*}\tilde{\omega}_{k} and Fr,k∗​Ω~kF_{r,k}^{*}\tilde{\Omega}_{k}) converges to g0g_{0} (resp. ω0\omega_{0} and Ω0\Omega_{0}) in the C∞C^{\infty}-sense. The purpose of this section is to prove that (X,ω0,Ω0)(X,\omega_{0},\Omega_{0}) admits a special lagrangian fibration.

By the smooth convergence, ig0​(p0)=limk→∞ig~k​(pk)=1i_{g_{0}}(p_{0})=\lim\limits_{k\rightarrow\infty}i_{\tilde{g}_{k}}(p_{k})=1. The soul theorem (c.f. [6], [29]) implies that there is a compact flat totally geodesic submanifold S⊂XS\subset X, the soul, such that (X,g0)(X,g_{0}) is isometric to the total space of the normal bundle ν⁡(S)\nu(S) with a metric induced by g0|Sg_{0}|_{S} and a natural flat connection.

Lemma 3.1.

dimℝS≥n\dim_{\mathbb{R}}S\geq n.

Proof.

If dimℝS<n\dim_{\mathbb{R}}S<n, then

Hn​(X,ℂ)=Hn​(Tr​(S),ℂ)=Hn​(S,ℂ)={0}H^{n}(X,\mathbb{C})=H^{n}(T_{r}(S),\mathbb{C})=H^{n}(S,\mathbb{C})=\{0\}

for any r>0r>0, where Tr​(S)={p∈X|d​i​s​tg0​(p,S)≤r}T_{r}(S)=\{p\in X|dist_{g_{0}}(p,S)\leq r\}. Let r0>r1>σr_{0}>r_{1}>\sigma such that Tr1​(S)⊂Bg0​(x0,r0)T_{r_{1}}(S)\subset B_{g_{0}}(x_{0},r_{0}), and Fr0,k​(Tr1​(S))⊃Bg~k​(xk,σ)F_{r_{0},k}(T_{r_{1}}(S))\supset B_{\tilde{g}_{k}}(x_{k},\sigma) for k≫1k\gg 1. Then the inclusion maps induce homeomorphisms on cohomology groups

Hn​(M,ℂ)⟶Hn​(Fr0,k​(Tr1​(S)),ℂ)⟶Hn​(Bg~k​(xk,σ),ℂ),H^{n}(M,\mathbb{C})\longrightarrow H^{n}(F_{r_{0},k}(T_{r_{1}}(S)),\mathbb{C})\longrightarrow H^{n}(B_{\tilde{g}_{k}}(x_{k},\sigma),\mathbb{C}),
and[Ω~k]↦[Ω~k|Fr0,k​(Tr1​(S))]↦[Ω~k|Bg~k​(xk,σ)]≠0.{\rm and}\ \ \ [\tilde{\Omega}_{k}]\mapsto[\tilde{\Omega}_{k}|_{F_{r_{0},k}(T_{r_{1}}(S))}]\mapsto[\tilde{\Omega}_{k}|_{B_{\tilde{g}_{k}}(x_{k},\sigma)}]\neq 0.

Thus [Ω~k|Fr0,k​(Tr1​(S))]≠0[\tilde{\Omega}_{k}|_{F_{r_{0},k}(T_{r_{1}}(S))}]\neq 0 in Hn​(Fr0,k​(Tr1​(S)),ℂ)H^{n}(F_{r_{0},k}(T_{r_{1}}(S)),\mathbb{C}), which contradicts to

Hn​(Fr0,k​(Tr1​(S)),ℂ)≅Hn​(Tr1​(S),ℂ)={0}.H^{n}(F_{r_{0},k}(T_{r_{1}}(S)),\mathbb{C})\cong H^{n}(T_{r_{1}}(S),\mathbb{C})=\{0\}.

∎

If πh:S~⟶S\pi_{h}:\tilde{S}\longrightarrow S is the holonomy covering of SS, Bieberbach’s theorem (c.f. [6], [29]) says that (S~,πh∗​g0)(\tilde{S},\pi_{h}^{*}g_{0}) is isometric to a flat torus, and πh\pi_{h} has finite order at most λ⁡(n)\lambda(n), for a constant λ⁡(n)\lambda(n) depending only on nn. If we denote π¯:ℂn⟶X\bar{\pi}:\mathbb{C}^{n}\longrightarrow X the universal covering of XX with π¯​(0)∈S\bar{\pi}(0)\in S, then S¯=π¯−1​(S)\bar{S}=\bar{\pi}^{-1}(S) is a real linear subspace of ℂn\mathbb{C}^{n}, and ωE=π¯∗​ω0\omega_{E}=\bar{\pi}^{*}\omega_{0} (resp. ΩE=π¯∗​Ω0\Omega_{E}=\bar{\pi}^{*}\Omega_{0}) is the standard flat Kähler form (resp. the standard holomorphic volume form), i.e. ωE=−1​∑αd​zα∧d​z¯α\omega_{E}=\sqrt{-1}\sum_{\alpha}dz_{\alpha}\wedge d\bar{z}_{\alpha} and ΩE=d​z1∧⋯∧d​zn\Omega_{E}=dz_{1}\wedge\cdots\wedge dz_{n} under some coordinates z1,⋯,znz_{1},\cdots,z_{n} on ℂn\mathbb{C}^{n}. Note that there is a lattice Λ⊂S¯\Lambda\subset\bar{S} such that S~=S¯/Λ\tilde{S}=\bar{S}/\Lambda. If we denote 𝔮:S¯⟶S~\mathfrak{q}:\bar{S}\longrightarrow\tilde{S} the quotient map, then π¯=πh∘𝔮\bar{\pi}=\pi_{h}\circ\mathfrak{q}.

Lemma 3.2.

dimℝS¯=n\dim_{\mathbb{R}}\bar{S}=n, and there is a constant θ0∈ℝ\theta_{0}\in\mathbb{R} such that ωE|S¯=0\omega_{E}|_{\bar{S}}=0 and Im​e−1​θ0​ΩE|S¯=0.{\rm Im}e^{\sqrt{-1}\theta_{0}}\Omega_{E}|_{\bar{S}}=0. Moreover, SS is a special lagrangian submanifold of phase θ0\theta_{0} in (X,ω0,Ω0)(X,\omega_{0},\Omega_{0}), i.e. dimℝS=n\dim_{\mathbb{R}}S=n,

ω0|S≡0,andIm​e−1​θ0​Ω0|S=0.\omega_{0}|_{S}\equiv 0,\ \ {\rm and}\ \ {\rm Im}e^{\sqrt{-1}\theta_{0}}\Omega_{0}|_{S}=0.
Proof.

If ωE|S¯≠0\omega_{E}|_{\bar{S}}\neq 0, and thus ω0|S≠0\omega_{0}|_{S}\neq 0, then there are two vectors v1,v2∈S¯v_{1},v_{2}\in\bar{S} such that ωE​(v1,v2)>0\omega_{E}(v_{1},v_{2})>0. By perturbing v1v_{1} and v2v_{2} a little bit if necessary, we have that Σ~=𝔮⁡({t1​v1+t2​v2|ti∈ℝ})\tilde{\Sigma}=\mathfrak{q}(\{t_{1}v_{1}+t_{2}v_{2}|t_{i}\in\mathbb{R}\}) is a closed 2-torus in S~\tilde{S}, i.e. a closed 2-parameters subgroup. Thus Σ=πh​(Σ~)\Sigma=\pi_{h}(\tilde{\Sigma}) is a closed oriented surface in SS, which satisfies

∫Σω0≥1λ⁡(n)​∫Σ~πh∗​ω0≥ωE​(v1,v2)λ⁡(n)​‖v1∧v2‖hE​VE>0,\int_{\Sigma}\omega_{0}\geq\frac{1}{\lambda(n)}\int_{\tilde{\Sigma}}\pi_{h}^{*}\omega_{0}\geq\frac{\omega_{E}(v_{1},v_{2})}{\lambda(n)\|v_{1}\wedge v_{2}\|_{h_{E}}}V_{E}>0,

where VEV_{E} denotes the Euclidean area of the intersection of {t1​v1+t2​v2|ti∈ℝ}\{t_{1}v_{1}+t_{2}v_{2}|t_{i}\in\mathbb{R}\} with the fundamental domain of the quotient map 𝔮\mathfrak{q}. From the smooth convergence of (Mk,ω~k,g~k)(M_{k},\tilde{\omega}_{k},\tilde{g}_{k}),

limk⟶∞igk−2​(pk)​∫Fr,k​(Σ)ωk=limk⟶∞∫Fr,k​(Σ)ω~k=limk⟶∞∫ΣFr,k∗​ω~k=∫Σω0,\lim_{k\longrightarrow\infty}i^{-2}_{g_{k}}(p_{k})\int_{F_{r,k}(\Sigma)}\omega_{k}=\lim_{k\longrightarrow\infty}\int_{F_{r,k}(\Sigma)}\tilde{\omega}_{k}=\lim_{k\longrightarrow\infty}\int_{\Sigma}F_{r,k}^{*}\tilde{\omega}_{k}=\int_{\Sigma}\omega_{0},

for r≫1r\gg 1 such that Σ⊂Bg0​(p0,r)\Sigma\subset B_{g_{0}}(p_{0},r). Thus

0<12​igk2​(pk)​∫Σω0≤∫Fr,k​(Σ)ωk≤2​igk2​(pk)​∫Σω0≤2​k−2​∫Σω0<1,0<\frac{1}{2}i^{2}_{g_{k}}(p_{k})\int_{\Sigma}\omega_{0}\leq\int_{F_{r,k}(\Sigma)}\omega_{k}\leq 2i^{2}_{g_{k}}(p_{k})\int_{\Sigma}\omega_{0}\leq 2k^{-2}\int_{\Sigma}\omega_{0}<1,

for k≫1k\gg 1. Since [Fr,k​(Σ)]∈H2​(Mk,ℤ)[F_{r,k}(\Sigma)]\in H_{2}(M_{k},\mathbb{Z}) and [ωk]∈H2​(Mk,ℤ)[\omega_{k}]\in H^{2}(M_{k},\mathbb{Z}), we obtain

∫Fr,k​(Σ)ωk∈ℤ,\int_{F_{r,k}(\Sigma)}\omega_{k}\in\mathbb{Z},

which is a contradiction. Hence ωE|S¯≡0\omega_{E}|_{\bar{S}}\equiv 0 and ω0|S≡0\omega_{0}|_{S}\equiv 0, which implies that SS is a lagrangian submanifold (X,ω0)(X,\omega_{0}) by combining Lemma 3.1.

Since S¯\bar{S} is a lagrangian linear subspace of (ℂn,ωE)(\mathbb{C}^{n},\omega_{E}), there is a θ0∈ℝ\theta_{0}\in\mathbb{R} such that Im​e−1​θ0​ΩE|S¯=0{\rm Im}e^{\sqrt{-1}\theta_{0}}\Omega_{E}|_{\bar{S}}=0. This implies that S¯\bar{S} is a special lagrangian linear subspace of phase θ0\theta_{0} in (ℂn,ωE,ΩE)(\mathbb{C}^{n},\omega_{E},\Omega_{E}). Thus SS is a special lagrangian submanifold of phase θ0\theta_{0} in (X,ω0,Ω0)(X,\omega_{0},\Omega_{0}), i.e.

ω0|S=0,Im​e−1​θ0​Ω0|S=0.\omega_{0}|_{S}=0,\ \ \ {\rm Im}e^{\sqrt{-1}\theta_{0}}\Omega_{0}|_{S}=0.

∎

Lemma 3.3.

For k≫1k\gg 1, [Fr,k∗​ω~k|S]=0[F_{r,k}^{*}\tilde{\omega}_{k}|_{S}]=0 in H2​(S,ℝ)H^{2}(S,\mathbb{R}).

Proof.

By the smooth convergence of ω~k\tilde{\omega}_{k} and Lemma 3.2,

limk⟶∞∫Fr,k​(A)ω~k=∫Aω0=0,\lim_{k\longrightarrow\infty}\int_{F_{r,k}(A)}\tilde{\omega}_{k}=\int_{A}\omega_{0}=0,

for any cycle A∈H2​(S,ℤ)A\in H_{2}(S,\mathbb{Z}). For k≫1k\gg 1, we have

|∫Fr,k​(A)ωk|=igk2​(pk)​|∫Fr,k​(A)ω~k|<12​k2<1.|\int_{F_{r,k}(A)}\omega_{k}|=i^{2}_{g_{k}}(p_{k})|\int_{F_{r,k}(A)}\tilde{\omega}_{k}|<\frac{1}{2k^{2}}<1.

Since [Fr,k​(A)]∈H2​(Mk,ℤ)[F_{r,k}(A)]\in H_{2}(M_{k},\mathbb{Z}) and [ωk]∈H2​(Mk,ℤ)[\omega_{k}]\in H^{2}(M_{k},\mathbb{Z}), we obtain ∫Fr,k​(A)ωk∈ℤ\int_{F_{r,k}(A)}\omega_{k}\in\mathbb{Z}. This implies that |∫Fr,k​(A)ωk|=0|\int_{F_{r,k}(A)}\omega_{k}|=0, and we obtain the conclusion

∫AFr,k∗​ω~k=0.\int_{A}F_{r,k}^{*}\tilde{\omega}_{k}=0.

∎

Let X~\tilde{X} be the total space of the pull-back πh∗​ν​(S)\pi_{h}^{*}\nu(S) of the normal bundle. Note that we can identify the zero section of πh∗​ν​(S)\pi_{h}^{*}\nu(S) with S~\tilde{S}, and the covering πh\pi_{h} extends to a finite covering π:X~⟶X\pi:\tilde{X}\longrightarrow X of XX, i.e. S~=π−1​(S)⊂X~\tilde{S}=\pi^{-1}(S)\subset\tilde{X}, and π|S~=πh\pi|_{\tilde{S}}=\pi_{h}. The fundamental group π1​(S~)≅π1​(X~)\pi_{1}(\tilde{S})\cong\pi_{1}(\tilde{X}) is isomorphic to the lattice Λ\Lambda, π1​(X~)\pi_{1}(\tilde{X}) is a normal subgroup of π1​(X)=π1​(S)\pi_{1}(X)=\pi_{1}(S), and the covering group Γ≅π1​(S)/π1​(S~)=π1​(X)/π1​(X~)\Gamma\cong\pi_{1}(S)/\pi_{1}(\tilde{S})=\pi_{1}(X)/\pi_{1}(\tilde{X}). Note that π1​(X~)\pi_{1}(\tilde{X}) (resp. π1​(X)\pi_{1}(X)) acts on ℂn\mathbb{C}^{n} preserving gEg_{E}, ωE\omega_{E} and ΩE\Omega_{E}, S¯\bar{S} is invariant, X~=ℂn/π1​(X~)\tilde{X}=\mathbb{C}^{n}/\pi_{1}(\tilde{X}) (resp. X=ℂn/π1​(X)X=\mathbb{C}^{n}/\pi_{1}(X)), and S~=S¯/π1​(S~)=S¯/Λ\tilde{S}=\bar{S}/\pi_{1}(\tilde{S})=\bar{S}/\Lambda (resp. S=S¯/π1​(S)S=\bar{S}/\pi_{1}(S)).

Proposition 3.4.

Let S¯⟂\bar{S}^{\perp} be the orthogonal complement of S¯\bar{S} in ℂn\mathbb{C}^{n}, i.e. ℂn=S¯⊕S¯⟂\mathbb{C}^{n}=\bar{S}\oplus\bar{S}^{\perp}, and gE​(v,w)=0g_{E}(v,w)=0, for any v∈S¯v\in\bar{S} and w∈S¯⟂w\in\bar{S}^{\perp}. Then

  • i)

    (X~,π∗​g0)(\tilde{X},\pi^{*}g_{0}) is isometric to (Tn×S¯⟂,h+hE)(T^{n}\times\bar{S}^{\perp},h+h_{E}), where Tn=S¯/Λ=S~T^{n}=\bar{S}/\Lambda=\tilde{S}, hE=gE|S¯⟂h_{E}=g_{E}|_{\bar{S}^{\perp}}, and hh is the standard flat metric on TnT^{n} induced by gE|S¯g_{E}|_{\bar{S}}.

  • ii)

    The action of Γ\Gamma on X~\tilde{X} is a product action, i.e. there are Γ\Gamma-actions on TnT^{n} and S¯⟂\bar{S}^{\perp} such that γ⋅(x,y)=(γ⋅x,γ⋅y)\gamma\cdot(x,y)=(\gamma\cdot x,\gamma\cdot y) for any γ∈Γ\gamma\in\Gamma, x∈Tnx\in T^{n} and y∈S¯⟂y\in\bar{S}^{\perp}. Furthermore, Tn×{0}T^{n}\times\{0\} is Γ\Gamma-invariant, and S=π⁡(Tn×{0})=(Tn×{0})/ΓS=\pi(T^{n}\times\{0\})=(T^{n}\times\{0\})/\Gamma.

  • iii)
    π∗​ω0|Tn×{y}≡0,andπ∗​Im​e−1​θ0​Ω0|Tn×{y}≡0,\pi^{*}\omega_{0}|_{T^{n}\times\{y\}}\equiv 0,\ \ {\rm and}\ \ \pi^{*}{\rm Im}e^{\sqrt{-1}\theta_{0}}\Omega_{0}|_{T^{n}\times\{y\}}\equiv 0,

    for any y∈S¯⟂y\in\bar{S}^{\perp}, and a constant θ0∈ℝ\theta_{0}\in\mathbb{R}.

Proof.

We choose coordinates x1,⋯,xnx_{1},\cdots,x_{n} on S¯\bar{S} and y1,⋯,yny_{1},\cdots,y_{n} on S¯⟂\bar{S}^{\perp} such that

gE=∑(d​xj2+d​yj2),ωE=∑d​xj∧d​yj,e−1​θ0​ΩE=⋀j=1n(d​xj+−1​d​yj).g_{E}=\sum(dx_{j}^{2}+dy_{j}^{2}),\ \ \ \omega_{E}=\sum dx_{j}\wedge dy_{j},\ \ \ e^{\sqrt{-1}\theta_{0}}\Omega_{E}=\bigwedge_{j=1}^{n}(dx_{j}+\sqrt{-1}dy_{j}).

If 𝒢\mathcal{G} is a subgroup of the fundamental group π1​(X)=π1​(S)\pi_{1}(X)=\pi_{1}(S), then 𝒢\mathcal{G} acts on ℂn\mathbb{C}^{n} preserving gEg_{E}, ωE\omega_{E} and ΩE\Omega_{E}, and S¯\bar{S} is a invariant subspace. For any γ∈𝒢\gamma\in\mathcal{G}, we have γ⋅(v+w)=Gγ​(v+w)+bγ\gamma\cdot(v+w)=G_{\gamma}(v+w)+b_{\gamma}, where Gγ∈U⁡(ℂn)G_{\gamma}\in U(\mathbb{C}^{n}), bγ∈S¯b_{\gamma}\in\bar{S}, v∈S¯v\in\bar{S} and w∈S¯⟂w\in\bar{S}^{\perp}. Since S¯\bar{S} is invariant, we obtain then Gγ​(v+w)=Aγ​v+Bγ​w+Cγ​wG_{\gamma}(v+w)=A_{\gamma}v+B_{\gamma}w+C_{\gamma}w where Aγ∈S​O​(S¯)A_{\gamma}\in SO(\bar{S}), Bγ∈S​O​(S¯⟂)B_{\gamma}\in SO(\bar{S}^{\perp}), and Cγ∈H​o​m​(S¯⟂,S¯)C_{\gamma}\in Hom(\bar{S}^{\perp},\bar{S}). Moreover, Gγ∈S​O​(ℝ2​n)G_{\gamma}\in SO(\mathbb{R}^{2n}) implies Cγ=0C_{\gamma}=0. Since ωE​(Gγ​(v+w),Gγ​(v+w))=ωE​(v+w,v+w)\omega_{E}(G_{\gamma}(v+w),G_{\gamma}(v+w))=\omega_{E}(v+w,v+w), we have Bγ=Aγ−1,T=AγB_{\gamma}=A_{\gamma}^{-1,T}=A_{\gamma}, and γ⋅(v+w)=Aγ​(v+w)+bγ\gamma\cdot(v+w)=A_{\gamma}(v+w)+b_{\gamma}. Thus π1​(X~)≅Λ\pi_{1}(\tilde{X})\cong\Lambda acts on ℂn\mathbb{C}^{n} given by γ⋅(v+w)=v+w+bγ\gamma\cdot(v+w)=v+w+b_{\gamma}, bγ∈Λb_{\gamma}\in\Lambda, for any v∈S¯v\in\bar{S} and w∈S¯⟂w\in\bar{S}^{\perp}. This implies that X~=ℂn/π1​(X~)≅S¯/Λ×S¯⟂=S~×S¯⟂\tilde{X}=\mathbb{C}^{n}/\pi_{1}(\tilde{X})\cong\bar{S}/\Lambda\times\bar{S}^{\perp}=\tilde{S}\times\bar{S}^{\perp}, and π∗​g0=h+hE\pi^{*}g_{0}=h+h_{E} where hE=gE|S¯⟂h_{E}=g_{E}|_{\bar{S}^{\perp}}, and hh is the standard flat metric on S~\tilde{S} induced by gE|S¯g_{E}|_{\bar{S}}.

The π1​(X)\pi_{1}(X)-action on ℂn\mathbb{C}^{n} descents to a Γ\Gamma-action on X~\tilde{X}, which is a product action since the π1​(X)\pi_{1}(X)-action is so. Moreover, S~×{0}\tilde{S}\times\{0\} is a invariant set as S¯×{0}\bar{S}\times\{0\} is invariant under the π1​(X)\pi_{1}(X)-action. If we denote the quotient map 𝔮1:ℂn⟶ℂn/Λ=X~\mathfrak{q}_{1}:\mathbb{C}^{n}\longrightarrow\mathbb{C}^{n}/\Lambda=\tilde{X}, then π¯=π∘𝔮1\bar{\pi}=\pi\circ\mathfrak{q}_{1}, gE=𝔮1∗​π∗​g0g_{E}=\mathfrak{q}_{1}^{*}\pi^{*}g_{0}, ωE=𝔮1∗​π∗​ω0\omega_{E}=\mathfrak{q}_{1}^{*}\pi^{*}\omega_{0}, and ΩE=𝔮1∗​π∗​Ω0\Omega_{E}=\mathfrak{q}_{1}^{*}\pi^{*}\Omega_{0}. Since ωE|S¯×{y}=0\omega_{E}|_{\bar{S}\times\{y\}}=0 and e−1​θ0​ΩE|S¯×{y}=0e^{\sqrt{-1}\theta_{0}}\Omega_{E}|_{\bar{S}\times\{y\}}=0 for y∈S¯⟂y\in\bar{S}^{\perp}, we obtain that

π∗​ω0|Tn×{y}≡0,andπ∗​Im​e−1​θ0​Ω0|Tn×{y}≡0,\pi^{*}\omega_{0}|_{T^{n}\times\{y\}}\equiv 0,\ \ {\rm and}\ \ \pi^{*}{\rm Im}e^{\sqrt{-1}\theta_{0}}\Omega_{0}|_{T^{n}\times\{y\}}\equiv 0,

for a constant θ0∈ℝ\theta_{0}\in\mathbb{R}. ∎

Remark 3.5.

The coordinates x1,⋯,xnx_{1},\cdots,x_{n} on S¯\bar{S} in the proof of this proposition induce parallel 1-forms d​x1,⋯,d​xndx_{1},\cdots,dx_{n} on (S~,h)(\tilde{S},h)£¬ which are pointwise linear independent, i.e. d​x1,⋯,d​xndx_{1},\cdots,dx_{n} is a global parallel frame field. Under the coordinates y1,⋯,yny_{1},\cdots,y_{n} on S¯⟂\bar{S}^{\perp}, we have these formulas

π∗​g0=∑(d​xj2+d​yj2),π∗​ω0=∑d​xj∧d​yj,e−1​θ0​π∗​Ω0=⋀j=1n(d​xj+−1​d​yj).\pi^{*}g_{0}=\sum(dx_{j}^{2}+dy_{j}^{2}),\ \ \ \pi^{*}\omega_{0}=\sum dx_{j}\wedge dy_{j},\ \ \ e^{\sqrt{-1}\theta_{0}}\pi^{*}\Omega_{0}=\bigwedge_{j=1}^{n}(dx_{j}+\sqrt{-1}dy_{j}).
Remark 3.6.

The natural projection f0:X~⟶S¯⟂f_{0}:\tilde{X}\longrightarrow\bar{S}^{\perp} is equivariant under the Γ\Gamma actions on X~\tilde{X} and S¯⟂\bar{S}^{\perp}. For any y∈S¯⟂y\in\bar{S}^{\perp}, f0−1​(y)=S~×{y}f_{0}^{-1}(y)=\tilde{S}\times\{y\}, and f0f_{0} is a special lagrangian fibration on (X~,π∗​ω0,e−1​θ0​π∗​Ω0)(\tilde{X},\pi^{*}\omega_{0},e^{\sqrt{-1}\theta_{0}}\pi^{*}\Omega_{0}), i.e. dimℝf0−1​(y)=n\dim_{\mathbb{R}}f_{0}^{-1}(y)=n,

π∗​ω0|f0−1​(y)≡0,e−1​θ0​π∗​Ω0|f0−1​(y)≡0.\pi^{*}\omega_{0}|_{f_{0}^{-1}(y)}\equiv 0,\ \ \ e^{\sqrt{-1}\theta_{0}}\pi^{*}\Omega_{0}|_{f_{0}^{-1}(y)}\equiv 0.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.