ScalingStacks

Proof. [03CP]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

Since we may check semipositivity after a base extension (see Lemma 3.3), we may replace KK by a finite field extension of KK. Then, using Lemma 3.6, we may assume that XX is a variety.

Let φ\varphi be a model function on XX which is the pointwise limit of θ\theta-psh functions. Replacing θ\theta by θ+d​dc​φ\theta+dd^{c}\varphi, we may assume that φ=0\varphi=0. Then the existence of a θ\theta-psh function yields that θ\theta is semipositive and hence {θ}\{\theta\} is nef (see 4.8). Let 𝒳{\mathscr{X}} be a K∘{K^{\circ}}-model of XX such that θ\theta is determined on 𝒳{\mathscr{X}}. Then the restriction of θ𝒳\theta_{\mathscr{X}} to XX is nef.

We may replace 𝒳{\mathscr{X}} by a generically finite covering 𝒳′{\mathscr{X}}^{\prime} for any K∘{K^{\circ}}-model 𝒳′{\mathscr{X}}^{\prime} with generic fibre X′X^{\prime}. This does not change convergence of metrics and semipositivity. It is here, where we use that pointwise convergence holds on Xan{X^{\rm an}}. By [dJ96, Theorem 4.5], up to replacing KK by a finite field extension, we may assume that 𝒳{\mathscr{X}} is SNC (see 5.1). The proof of Proposition 4.13 shows that N1​(𝒳/S)N^{1}({\mathscr{X}}/S) is a finite dimensional ℝ{\mathbb{R}}-vector space as we can see it as a subspace of N1​(𝒳s)N^{1}({\mathscr{X}}_{s}). We have also seen that the ample cone in N1​(𝒳/S)N^{1}({\mathscr{X}}/S) is the intersection of N1​(𝒳/S)N^{1}({\mathscr{X}}/S) with the ample cone in N1​(𝒳s)N^{1}({\mathscr{X}}_{s}) and hence it is open in N1​(𝒳/S)N^{1}({\mathscr{X}}/S). We conclude that there are ℋ1,…,ℋn{\mathscr{H}}_{1},\dots,{\mathscr{H}}_{n} ample line bundles on 𝒳{\mathscr{X}} such that their numerical classes αj\alpha_{j} form a basis of N1​(𝒳/S)N^{1}({\mathscr{X}}/S). Then there are λj∈ℝ\lambda_{j}\in{\mathbb{R}} such that

c1​(ℒ):=∑jλj​c1​(ℋj)∈Pic​(𝒳)ℝc_{1}({\mathscr{L}}):=\sum_{j}\lambda_{j}c_{1}({\mathscr{H}}_{j})\in{\rm Pic}({\mathscr{X}})_{\mathbb{R}}

represents θ\theta. Let εj{\varepsilon}_{j} be small positive numbers such that the numbers λj+εj\lambda_{j}+{\varepsilon}_{j} are rational. We consider the ℚ{\mathbb{Q}}-line bundle

ℒε:=⨂jℋj⊗(λj+εj){\mathscr{L}}_{\varepsilon}:=\bigotimes_{j}{\mathscr{H}}_{j}^{\otimes(\lambda_{j}+{\varepsilon}_{j})}

on 𝒳{\mathscr{X}} and let Lε:=ℒεL_{\varepsilon}:={\mathscr{L}}_{\varepsilon}. Since {θ}\{\theta\} is nef and εj>0{\varepsilon}_{j}>0, it follows that LεL_{\varepsilon} is ample. For any model function ψ\psi on XX, we have

c1(Lε,e−ψ∥∥ℒε)=ddcψ+θ+∑jεjαj.c_{1}(L_{\varepsilon},e^{-\psi}{\|\hskip 4.30554pt\|}_{{\mathscr{L}}_{\varepsilon}})=dd^{c}\psi+\theta+\sum_{j}{\varepsilon}_{j}\alpha_{j}.

We conclude that a θ\theta-psh model function ψ\psi yields a semipositive model metric e−ψ∥∥ℒεe^{-\psi}{\|\hskip 4.30554pt\|}_{{\mathscr{L}}_{\varepsilon}}. Since 00 is the pointwise limit of θ\theta-psh model functions ψ\psi, we deduce that ∥∥ℒε{\|\hskip 4.30554pt\|}_{{\mathscr{L}}_{\varepsilon}} is the pointwise limit of semipositive model metrics on LεL_{\varepsilon}. It follows from Proposition 5.2 that ∥∥ℒε{\|\hskip 4.30554pt\|}_{{\mathscr{L}}_{\varepsilon}} is semipositive. This means that ℒε{\mathscr{L}}_{\varepsilon} is nef.

By definition of nef and using N1​(𝒳/S)⊂N1​(𝒳s)N^{1}({\mathscr{X}}/S)\subset N^{1}({\mathscr{X}}_{s}), we see that the cone in N1​(𝒳/S)N^{1}({\mathscr{X}}/S) of nef classes is the intersection of N1​(𝒳/S)N^{1}({\mathscr{X}}/S) with the nef cone in N1​(𝒳s)N^{1}({\mathscr{X}}_{s}). In particular, the cone of nef classes is closed in N1​(𝒳/S)N^{1}({\mathscr{X}}/S). Using ε=(ε1,…,εn)→0{\varepsilon}=({\varepsilon}_{1},\dots,{\varepsilon}_{n})\to 0, we deduce that ℒ{\mathscr{L}} is nef. Since ℒ{\mathscr{L}} represents θ\theta, we conclude that φ=0\varphi=0 is θ\theta-psh. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.