ScalingStacks

Proof. [03BM]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context Β· Original author HTML

Proof.

By definition if 𝔏{\mathfrak{L}} is nef, then βˆ₯βˆ₯𝔏\|\ \|_{\mathfrak{L}} is semipositive, so we only have to prove the reverse implication. Hence we assume that βˆ₯βˆ₯𝔏{\|\hskip 4.30554pt\|}_{\mathfrak{L}} is a semipositive formal metric and we have to show that 𝔏{\mathfrak{L}} is nef. Using Lemma 3.3, we can replace KK by β„‚K{\mathbb{C}}_{K} and hence assume that KK is algebraically closed.

By definition of semipositivity, there is a nef K∘{K^{\circ}}-model 𝔐{\mathfrak{M}} of LL on some model π”š{\mathfrak{W}} of VV with βˆ₯βˆ₯𝔏=βˆ₯βˆ₯𝔐{\|\hskip 4.30554pt\|}_{\mathfrak{L}}={\|\hskip 4.30554pt\|}_{\mathfrak{M}}. There exists a model 𝔛{\mathfrak{X}} of VV which dominates both 𝔙{\mathfrak{V}} and π”š{\mathfrak{W}}. Let Ο€:𝔛→𝔙\pi:{\mathfrak{X}}\to{\mathfrak{V}} be the induced morphism. Since the induced morphism on the special fibers Ο€s:𝔛s→𝔙s\pi_{s}\colon{\mathfrak{X}}_{s}\to{\mathfrak{V}}_{s} is proper and surjective, by the projection formula, 𝔏{\mathfrak{L}} is nef if and only Ο€βˆ—β€‹π”\pi^{*}{\mathfrak{L}} is nef. Hence replacing (𝔙,𝔏)({\mathfrak{V}},{\mathfrak{L}}) by (𝔛,Ο€βˆ—β€‹π”)({\mathfrak{X}},\pi^{*}{\mathfrak{L}}), we can assume that 𝔙{\mathfrak{V}} dominates π”š{\mathfrak{W}}.

Let 𝔙red{\mathfrak{V}}_{\rm red} be the reduced structure on 𝔙{\mathfrak{V}}. Hence 𝔙red→𝔙{\mathfrak{V}}_{\rm red}\to{\mathfrak{V}} is finite. Locally, 𝔙red{\mathfrak{V}}_{\rm red} is given by Spf⁑(A){\rm Spf}(A) for some reduced admissible K∘{K^{\circ}}-algebra. Let π’œβ‰”AβŠ—K∘K{\mathscr{A}}\coloneqq A\otimes_{{K^{\circ}}}K. It is a strictly KK-affinoid algebra, and by [BGR84, 6.4.3] Aβ€²β‰”π’œβˆ˜A^{\prime}\coloneqq{\mathscr{A}}^{\circ} is an admissible K∘K^{\circ}-algebra, and moreover Aβ†’Aβ€²A\to A^{\prime} is finite and induces an isomorphism on the generic fibers. By [BGR84, 7.2.6 Proposition 3], we can glue the morphisms Spf⁑(Aβ€²)β†’Spf⁑(A){\rm Spf}(A^{\prime})\to{\rm Spf}(A) to get a model 𝔙′{\mathfrak{V}}^{\prime} of VredV_{\rm red} such that 𝔙′→𝔙red{\mathfrak{V}}^{\prime}\to{\mathfrak{V}}_{\rm red} is finite. In particular, we deduce that the induced morphisms 𝔙sβ€²β†’(𝔙red)s→𝔙s{\mathfrak{V}}^{\prime}_{s}\to({\mathfrak{V}}_{\rm red})_{s}\to{\mathfrak{V}}_{s} are proper and surjective, and we conclude from the projection formula that 𝔏{\mathfrak{L}} is nef if and only if its pull back 𝔏′{\mathfrak{L}}^{\prime} to 𝔙′{\mathfrak{V}}^{\prime} is nef.

By construction, 𝔙′{\mathfrak{V}}^{\prime} is locally of the form Spf⁑(π’œβˆ˜){\rm Spf}({\mathscr{A}}^{\circ}), hence we deduce that 𝔙sβ€²{\mathfrak{V}}^{\prime}_{s} is locally given by Spec⁑(π’œ~){\rm Spec}(\tilde{{\mathscr{A}}}) which is reduced. Now we use the fact that on an admissible formal scheme with reduced special fibre and with KK algebraically closed, the metric βˆ₯βˆ₯𝔏′{\|\hskip 4.30554pt\|}_{{\mathfrak{L}}^{\prime}} determines the model 𝔏′{\mathfrak{L}}^{\prime} up to isomorphism (see [Gub98, Proposition 7.5]). Using that βˆ₯βˆ₯𝔐′=βˆ₯βˆ₯𝔏=βˆ₯βˆ₯𝔏′{\|\hskip 4.30554pt\|}_{{\mathfrak{M}}^{\prime}}={\|\hskip 4.30554pt\|}_{\mathfrak{L}}={\|\hskip 4.30554pt\|}_{{\mathfrak{L}}^{\prime}} for the pull-back 𝔐′{\mathfrak{M}}^{\prime} of 𝔐{\mathfrak{M}} to 𝔙′{\mathfrak{V}}^{\prime}, we deduce that 𝔐′≅𝔏′{\mathfrak{M}}^{\prime}\cong{\mathfrak{L}}^{\prime}. As above, the pull-back 𝔐′{\mathfrak{M}}^{\prime} of 𝔐{\mathfrak{M}} is nef and hence 𝔏′{\mathfrak{L}}^{\prime} is nef. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.