ScalingStacks

Proof. [03B4]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

By compactness of U∖U∘U\setminus U^{\circ}, there exists a compact strictly KK-analytic domain Z⊂VZ\subset V such that ZZ is a neighbourhood of U∖U∘U\setminus U^{\circ} and W∩Z=∅W\cap Z=\emptyset. Hence W​∐ZW\coprod Z is a compact strictly KK-analytic domain of VV and we consider the piecewise linear function on W​∐ZW\coprod Z defined by ff on WW and by 00 on ZZ. Then we apply Proposition 2.6 to L=𝒪VL=\mathcal{O}_{V}, in which case formal metrics correspond to piecewise linear functions (see Proposition 2.8). We deduce that there exists a piecewise linear function g:V→ℝg\colon V\to{\mathbb{R}} which agrees with ff on WW and which agrees with 00 on ZZ. But since ZZ is a neighborhood of U∖U∘U\setminus U^{\circ}, we deduce that the function φ:V→ℝ\varphi\colon V\to{\mathbb{R}} defined by

φ⁡(x)={g⁡(x)if​x∈U0if​x∉U\varphi(x)=\begin{cases}g(x)&{\rm if}\ x\in U\\ 0&{\rm if}\ x\notin U\end{cases}

is still piecewise linear. Since φ\varphi extends ff and supp⁡(φ)⊂U{\rm supp}(\varphi)\subset U, we get the claim. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.