ScalingStacks

Proof. [039Q]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context Β· Original author HTML

Proof.

We start with the observation that we have

(7.1) Γ⁑(𝒳B,β„’BβŠ—m)β‰ 0\Gamma(\mathscr{X}_{B},\mathscr{L}_{B}^{\otimes m})\neq 0

for some m>0m>0. In fact we have

Γ⁑(𝒳B,β„’BβŠ—m)βŠ—RKβŸΆβˆΌΞ“β‘(X,LβŠ—m)β‰ 0\Gamma(\mathscr{X}_{B},\mathscr{L}_{B}^{\otimes m})\otimes_{R}K\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\sim}}{{\longrightarrow}}\Gamma(X,L^{\otimes m})\neq 0

by flat base change and the ampleness of LL for some m>0m>0.

We have a cartesian diagram

𝒳\textstyle{\mathscr{X}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}g\scriptstyle{g}𝒳B\textstyle{\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\mathscr{X}_{B}}{Spec}⁑K∘\textstyle{\Spec K^{\circ}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}h\scriptstyle{h}B\textstyle{B\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}{Spec}⁑k.\textstyle{\Spec k.}

We observe that 𝒳B\mathscr{X}_{B} is a smooth variety over the perfect field kk and write

π”žB,m=Im​(H0​(𝒳B,β„’BβŠ—m)βŠ—kβ„’BβŠ—βˆ’mβ†’π’ͺ𝒳B){\mathfrak{a}}_{B,m}=\mbox{Im}\bigl(H^{0}({{\mathscr{X}}}_{B},{\mathscr{L}}_{B}^{\otimes m})\otimes_{k}{\mathscr{L}}_{B}^{\otimes-m}\to{\mathcal{O}}_{{{\mathscr{X}}}_{B}}\bigr)

for the mm-th base ideal of β„’B\mathscr{L}_{B}. Consider the ideal gβˆ’1​(π”žB,m)β‹…π’ͺ𝒳g^{-1}({\mathfrak{a}}_{B,m})\cdot{\mathcal{O}}_{{\mathscr{X}}} in π’ͺ𝒳{\mathcal{O}}_{{{\mathscr{X}}}} generated by gβˆ’1​(π”žB,m)g^{-1}({\mathfrak{a}}_{B,m}). We have gβˆ’1​(π”žB,m)β‹…π’ͺ𝒳=gβˆ—β€‹π”žB,mg^{-1}({\mathfrak{a}}_{B,m})\cdot{\mathcal{O}}_{{\mathscr{X}}}=g^{*}{\mathfrak{a}}_{B,m} as gg is flat. Sections of π”žm{\mathfrak{a}}_{m} are locally of the form sβ‹…tβˆ’1s\cdot t^{-1} where sβˆˆΞ“β‘(𝒳,β„’βŠ—m)s\in\Gamma({{\mathscr{X}}},{\mathscr{L}}^{\otimes m}) is a global section and tt is a local section of β„’βŠ—m{\mathscr{L}}^{\otimes m}. Flat base change [Har77, Prop.Β III.9.3] gives

H0​(𝒳,β„’βŠ—m)=H0​(𝒳B,β„’BβŠ—m)βŠ—RK∘.H^{0}(\mathscr{X},\mathscr{L}^{\otimes m})=H^{0}(\mathscr{X}_{B},\mathscr{L}_{B}^{\otimes m})\otimes_{R}K^{\circ}.

Hence the formation of base ideals is compatible with base change, i.e.Β we have

(7.2) π”žm=gβˆ’1​(π”žB,m)β‹…π’ͺ𝒳=gβˆ—β€‹π”žB,m{\mathfrak{a}}_{m}=g^{-1}({\mathfrak{a}}_{B,m})\cdot{\mathcal{O}}_{{\mathscr{X}}}=g^{*}{\mathfrak{a}}_{B,m}

for all mβˆˆβ„•>0m\in\mathbb{N}_{>0}.

The family π”žB,βˆ™=(π”žB,m)m>0{\mathfrak{a}}_{B,\bullet}=({\mathfrak{a}}_{B,m})_{m>0} defines a graded sequence of ideals in the sense of Section 4. Let π”ŸB,m:=τ⁑(π”žB,βˆ™m){\mathfrak{b}}_{B,m}:=\tau({\mathfrak{a}}_{B,\bullet}^{m}) denote the associated asymptotic test ideal of exponent mm. Motivated by (7.2) we define

π”Ÿm:=gβˆ’1β€‹π”ŸB,mβ‹…π’ͺ𝒳=gβˆ—β€‹π”ŸB,m{\mathfrak{b}}_{m}:=g^{-1}{\mathfrak{b}}_{B,m}\cdot{\mathcal{O}}_{{{\mathscr{X}}}}=g^{*}{\mathfrak{b}}_{B,m}

as the ideal in π’ͺ𝒳{{\mathcal{O}}_{{\mathscr{X}}}} generated by π”ŸB,m.{\mathfrak{b}}_{B,m}. These ideals have the following properties:

  1. (a)

    We have π”žmβŠ‚π”Ÿm\mathfrak{a}_{m}\subset\mathfrak{b}_{m} for all mβˆˆβ„•>0m\in\mathbb{N}_{>0}.

  2. (b)

    We have π”Ÿm​lβŠ‚π”Ÿml\mathfrak{b}_{ml}\subset\mathfrak{b}_{m}^{l} for all l,mβˆˆβ„•>0l,m\in\mathbb{N}_{>0}.

  3. (c)

    There is m0β‰₯0m_{0}\geq 0 such that π’œβŠ—m0βŠ—β„’βŠ—mβŠ—π”Ÿm\mathcal{A}^{\otimes m_{0}}\otimes\mathscr{L}^{\otimes m}\otimes\mathfrak{b}_{m} is globally generated for all m>0m>0.

Properties (a) and (b) follow from the corresponding properties of π”žB,m\mathfrak{a}_{B,m} and π”ŸB,m\mathfrak{b}_{B,m} mentioned in (4.5), (4.6), and (4.7) if we observe (7.2).

Property (c) is a consequence of the generalization of Mustaţă’s uniform generation property given in Theorem 4.6. Write β„’B=π’ͺ⁑(D){\mathscr{L}}_{B}={\mathcal{O}}(D) for some divisor DD on 𝒳B{{\mathscr{X}}}_{B} and choose a divisor HH on 𝒳B{{\mathscr{X}}}_{B} such that π’ͺ⁑(H){\mathcal{O}}(H) is ample and globally generated. Fix d>dim𝒳Bd>\dim{{\mathscr{X}}}_{B} and a canonical divisor K𝒳B/kK_{{{\mathscr{X}}}_{B}/k} on the smooth kk-variety 𝒳B{{\mathscr{X}}}_{B}. As π’œB\mathcal{A}_{B} is ample we find some m0βˆˆβ„•m_{0}\in\mathbb{N} such that π’œBβŠ—m0βŠ—π’ͺ⁑(βˆ’KX/kβˆ’d​H)\mathcal{A}_{B}^{\otimes m_{0}}\otimes\mathcal{O}(-K_{X/k}-dH) is globally generated. Given mβˆˆβ„•>0m\in\mathbb{N}_{>0} we put E:=m​DE:=mD. Since β„’B\mathscr{L}_{B} satisfies (7.1), for any mβˆˆβ„•>0m\in\mathbb{N}_{>0} we may use E:=m​DE:=mD and Ξ»:=m\lambda:=m in Theorem 4.6 to see that the sheaf

π’ͺ⁑(K𝒳B/k+d​H)βŠ—β„’BβŠ—mβŠ—π”ŸB,m\displaystyle\mathcal{O}(K_{{{\mathscr{X}}}_{B}/k}+dH)\otimes\mathscr{L}_{B}^{\otimes m}\otimes\mathfrak{b}_{B,m}

is globally generated. As a consequence, our choice of m0m_{0} implies that π’œBβŠ—m0βŠ—β„’BβŠ—mβŠ—π”ŸB,m\mathcal{A}_{B}^{\otimes m_{0}}\otimes\mathscr{L}_{B}^{\otimes m}\otimes\mathfrak{b}_{B,m} is globally generated. Base change to K∘K^{\circ} proves (c).

Now we follow the proof of [BFJ16a, Thm.Β 8.5]. Step 1 of loc.Β cit.Β holds not only on quasi-monomial points of Xan{X^{{\mathrm{an}}}}, but pointwise on the whole Xan{X^{{\mathrm{an}}}} using Proposition 2.10 and our different definition of Pθ​(0)P_{\theta}(0). Then Step 2 of loc.Β cit.Β works in our setting using properties (a), (b), and (c) above. The only difference is that all inequalities hold immediately on Xan{X^{{\mathrm{an}}}} and not only on the quasi-monomial points of Xan{X^{{\mathrm{an}}}}. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.