ScalingStacks

4. Asymptotic test ideals [0394]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

4. Asymptotic test ideals

We recall definitions and some basic properties from the theory of generalized and asymptotic test ideals developed in [BMS08, Sect. 2] and [Mus13, Sect. 3]. We refer to [ST12] for a more comprehensive overview of the theory of test ideals. Let XX be a smooth variety over a perfect field kk of characteristic p>0p>0. Let F:X→XF\colon X\to X denote the Frobenius morphism which is induced by the pp-th power ring morphism on affine subsets. Write

ωX/k=detΩX/K=𝒪X​(KX/k)\omega_{X/k}=\det\Omega_{X/K}={\mathcal{O}}_{X}(K_{X/k})

for some canonical divisor KX/kK_{X/k} on XX.

Let 𝔞{\mathfrak{a}} be an ideal in 𝒪X{\mathcal{O}}_{X} and e∈ℕ>0e\in\mathbb{N}_{>0}. There is a unique ideal 𝔞[pe]{\mathfrak{a}}^{[p^{e}]} in 𝒪X{\mathcal{O}}_{X} such that for every open affine UU in XX the ideal 𝔞[pe]​(U){\mathfrak{a}}^{[p^{e}]}(U) in 𝒪X​(U){\mathcal{O}}_{X}(U) is generated by {upe|u∈𝔞⁡(U)}\{u^{p^{e}}\,|\,u\in{\mathfrak{a}}(U)\}. We have [BMS08, bottom of p. 44]

(4.1) 𝔞⁡(U)={a∈𝒪X​(U)|ape∈𝔞[pe]​(U)}{\mathfrak{a}}(U)=\{a\in{\mathcal{O}}_{X}(U)\,|\,a^{p^{e}}\in{\mathfrak{a}}^{[p^{e}]}(U)\}

We recall the following facts from [Mus13, p. 540]: There is a canonical trace map Tr:F∗​(ωX/k)→ωX/k{\rm Tr}\colon F_{*}(\omega_{X/k})\to\omega_{X/k} whose construction can be based on the Cartier isomorphism [Kat70, Thm. (7.2) and Eq. (7.2.3)]. Mustaţă gives an explicit description of the trace map [Mus13, top of p. 540]. Given e∈ℕ>0e\in\mathbb{N}_{>0} there is an iterated trace map Tre:F∗e​(ωX/k)→ωX/k{\rm Tr}^{e}\colon F^{e}_{*}(\omega_{X/k})\to\omega_{X/k}. For an ideal 𝔞\mathfrak{a} in 𝒪X{\mathcal{O}}_{X} there exists a unique ideal 𝔞[1/pe]\mathfrak{a}^{[1/p^{e}]} in 𝒪X{\mathcal{O}}_{X} with

(4.2) Tre​(F∗e​(𝔞⋅ωX/k))=𝔞[1/pe]⋅ωX/k.{\rm Tr}^{e}(F^{e}_{*}(\mathfrak{a}\cdot\omega_{X/k}))=\mathfrak{a}^{[1/p^{e}]}\cdot\omega_{X/k}.

This definition of 𝔞[1/pe]\mathfrak{a}^{[1/p^{e}]} is compatible with [BMS08, Def. 2.2]. Hence we have

(4.3) (𝔞[pe])[1/pe]=𝔞⊆(𝔞[1/pe])[pe]\bigl({\mathfrak{a}}^{[p^{e}]}\bigr)^{[1/p^{e}]}={\mathfrak{a}}\subseteq\bigl({\mathfrak{a}}^{[1/p^{e}]}\bigr)^{[p^{e}]}

by [BMS08, Lemma 2.4(iv)].

Definition 4.1.

[BMS08, Def. 2.9] Given an ideal 𝔞{\mathfrak{a}} in 𝒪X{\mathcal{O}}_{X} and λ∈ℝ≥0\lambda\in\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0} one defines the test ideal of 𝔞{\mathfrak{a}} of exponent λ\lambda to be

τ⁡(𝔞λ):=⋃e∈ℕ>0(𝔞⌈λ​pe⌉)[1/pe]\tau({\mathfrak{a}}^{\lambda}):=\bigcup_{e\in\mathbb{N}_{>0}}\Bigl({\mathfrak{a}}^{\lceil\lambda p^{e}\rceil}\Bigr)^{[1/p^{e}]}

where given r∈ℝr\in\mathbb{R} we write ⌈r⌉\lceil r\rceil for the smallest integer ≥r\geq r.

Remark 4.2.
  1. (i)

    Observe that we have τ⁡(𝔞λ)=(𝔞⌈λ​pe⌉)[1/pe]\tau({\mathfrak{a}}^{\lambda})=({\mathfrak{a}}^{\lceil\lambda p^{e}\rceil})^{[1/p^{e}]} for large e∈ℕe\in\mathbb{N} as XX is noetherian. The equality

    (4.4) τ⁡((𝔞m)λ)=τ⁡(𝔞λ​m)\tau(({\mathfrak{a}}^{m})^{\lambda})=\tau({\mathfrak{a}}^{\lambda m})

    for m∈ℕm\in\mathbb{N} shows that the notation in Definition 4.1 is compatible with taking powers of ideals [BMS08, Cor. 2.15]. We have τ⁡(𝔞λ)⊆τ⁡(𝔟λ)\tau({\mathfrak{a}}^{\lambda})\subseteq\tau({\mathfrak{b}}^{\lambda}) for ideals 𝔞⊆𝔟{\mathfrak{a}}\subseteq{\mathfrak{b}} in 𝒪X{\mathcal{O}}_{X} [BMS08, Prop. 2.11(i)].

  2. (ii)

    Choose ee such that τ⁡(𝔞)=(𝔞[pe])[1/pe]\tau({\mathfrak{a}})=({\mathfrak{a}}^{[p^{e}]})^{[1/p^{e}]}. For any ideal 𝔟{\mathfrak{b}} in 𝒪X{\mathcal{O}}_{X} such that 𝔞[pe]⊆𝔟[pe]{\mathfrak{a}}^{[p^{e}]}\subseteq{\mathfrak{b}}^{[p^{e}]} we get 𝔞⊆𝔟{\mathfrak{a}}\subseteq{\mathfrak{b}} from (4.1). Hence (4.3) implies

    (4.5) 𝔞⊆τ⁡(𝔞).{\mathfrak{a}}\subseteq\tau({\mathfrak{a}}).

Let 𝔞∙{\mathfrak{a}}_{\bullet} be graded sequence of ideals in 𝒪X{\mathcal{O}}_{X}, i.e. a family (𝔞m)m∈ℕ>0({\mathfrak{a}}_{m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}_{>0}} of ideals in 𝒪X{\mathcal{O}}_{X} such that 𝔞m⋅𝔞n⊆𝔞m+n{\mathfrak{a}}_{m}\cdot{\mathfrak{a}}_{n}\subseteq{\mathfrak{a}}_{m+n} for all m,n∈ℕ>0m,n\in\mathbb{N}_{>0} and 𝔞m≠(0){\mathfrak{a}}_{m}\neq(0) for some m>0m>0.

Definition 4.3.

[Mus13, p. 541] Choose λ∈ℝ≥0\lambda\in\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}. Define the asymptotic test ideal of exponent λ\lambda as

τ⁡(𝔞∙λ):=⋃m∈ℕτ⁡(𝔞mλ/m).\tau({\mathfrak{a}}_{\bullet}^{\lambda}):=\bigcup_{m\in\mathbb{N}}\tau({\mathfrak{a}}_{m}^{\lambda/m}).
Remark 4.4.
  1. (i)

    We have τ⁡(𝔞∙λ)=τ⁡(𝔞mλ/m)\tau({\mathfrak{a}}^{\lambda}_{\bullet})=\tau({\mathfrak{a}}_{m}^{\lambda/m}) for suitable m∈ℕm\in\mathbb{N} which are divisible enough [Mus13, p. 541].

  2. (ii)

    For all m∈ℕm\in\mathbb{N} we have [Mus13, p. 541, l. 4]

    (4.6) τ⁡(𝔞m)⊆τ⁡(𝔞∙m).\tau({\mathfrak{a}}_{m})\subseteq\tau({\mathfrak{a}}^{m}_{\bullet}).
  3. (iii)

    For all m∈ℕm\in\mathbb{N} we have the Subadditivity Property [Mus13, Prop. 3.1(ii)]

    (4.7) τ⁡(𝔞∙m​λ)⊆τ​(𝔞∙λ)m.\tau({\mathfrak{a}}_{\bullet}^{m\lambda})\subseteq\tau({\mathfrak{a}}_{\bullet}^{\lambda})^{m}.
Definition 4.5.

Let DD be a divisor on XX with h0​(X,𝒪X​(m​D))≠0h^{0}(X,{\mathcal{O}}_{X}(mD))\neq 0 for some m>0m>0. Define the asymptotic test ideal of exponent λ∈ℝ≥0\lambda\in\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0} associated with XX and DD as

τ⁡(λ⋅‖D‖):=τ⁡(𝔞∙λ)\tau(\lambda\cdot\|D\|):=\tau({\mathfrak{a}}_{\bullet}^{\lambda})

where 𝔞∙{\mathfrak{a}}_{\bullet} denotes the graded sequence of base ideals for DD, i.e. 𝔞m{\mathfrak{a}}_{m} is the image of the natural map

H0​(X,𝒪⁡(m​D))⊗k𝒪X​(−m​D)→𝒪X.H^{0}(X,{\mathcal{O}}(mD))\otimes_{k}{\mathcal{O}}_{X}(-mD)\to{\mathcal{O}}_{X}.

If DD is a ℚ\mathbb{Q}-divisor such that h0​(X,𝒪X​(m​D))≠0h^{0}(X,{\mathcal{O}}_{X}(mD))\neq 0 for some positive integer mm such that m​DmD is a usual divisor then we put τ⁡(λ⋅‖D‖):=τ⁡(λ/r⋅‖r​D‖)\tau(\lambda\cdot\|D\|):=\tau(\lambda/r\cdot\|rD\|) for some r∈ℕr\in\mathbb{N} such that r​DrD has integral coefficients.

We finish with a slight generalization of Mustaţă’s uniform generation property [Mus13, Thm. 4.1]. Observe that in loc. cit. it is required that the variety XX is projective over the ground field kk.

Theorem 4.6.

Let RR be a kk-algebra of finite type over a perfect field kk of characteristic p>0p>0. Let XX be an integral scheme of dimension nn which is projective over the spectrum of RR and smooth over kk. Let DD, EE, and HH be divisors on XX and λ∈ℚ≥0\lambda\in\mathbb{Q}_{\geq 0} such that

  1. (i)

    𝒪X​(H){\mathcal{O}}_{X}(H) is an ample, globally generated line bundle,

  2. (ii)

    h0​(X,𝒪X​(m​D))>0h^{0}(X,{\mathcal{O}}_{X}(mD))>0 for some m>0m>0, and

  3. (iii)

    the ℚ\mathbb{Q}-divisor E−λ​DE-\lambda D is nef.

Then the sheaf 𝒪X​(KX/k+E+d​H)⊗𝒪Xτ⁡(λ⋅‖D‖)\mathcal{O}_{X}(K_{X/k}+E+dH)\otimes_{\mathcal{O}_{X}}\tau(\lambda\cdot\|D\|) is globally generated for all d≥n+1d\geq n+1.

Proof.

We literally follow Mustaţă’s proof with two modifications. The proof requires Mumford’s theorem on Castelnuovo-Mumford regularity for the projective scheme XX over RR which holds also in this more general setting [BS13, 20.4.13]. Furthermore we replace the use of Fujita’s vanishing theorem to the sheaves ℱj:=𝒪𝒳​(KX/k+Tj)\mathscr{F}_{j}:=\mathcal{O}_{\mathscr{X}}(K_{X/k}+T_{j}), j=1,…,rj=1,\dots,r and the ample divisor (d−i)​H(d-i)H by an application of Keeler’s generalization [Kee03, Thm. 1.5]. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.