ScalingStacks

Remark 7.2 . [039N]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Remark 7.2.

Suppose that 𝒳\mathscr{X} and ℒ\mathscr{L} are defined over a subring RR of K∘{K^{\circ}} by a line bundle ℒR\mathscr{L}_{R} on a projective regular integral scheme 𝒳R\mathscr{X}_{R} over RR. We assume furthermore that RR is a discrete valuation ring which is defined geometrically by a dd-dimensional normal variety BB over a field kk, i.e. there exist b∈B(1)b\in B^{(1)} and an isomorphism h:R→∼𝒪B,bh\colon R\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\sim}}{{\to}}\mathcal{O}_{B,b}. We read the isomorphism hh as an identification. Then Assumption 7.1 is equivalent to the existence of data (R,k,B,b,h,𝒳R,ℒR)(R,k,B,b,h,\mathscr{X}_{R},\mathscr{L}_{R}) as above assuming furthermore that the field kk is perfect and the restriction of ℒR\mathscr{L}_{R} to the generic fiber 𝒳R,η\mathscr{X}_{R,\eta} over RR extends to an ample line bundle 𝒜R\mathcal{A}_{R} on 𝒳R\mathscr{X}_{R}.

One direction of the equivalence is clear by base change from BB to {Spec}⁡𝒪B,b\Spec\mathcal{O}_{B,b}. On the other hand, replacing BB by an open affine neighbourhood of bb, it is clear by [EGAIV, Cor. 9.6.4] that 𝒜R\mathcal{A}_{R} extends to an ample line bundle 𝒜B\mathcal{A}_{B} on a projective integral scheme 𝒳B\mathscr{X}_{B} over BB and that ℒR\mathscr{L}_{R} extends to a line bundle ℒB\mathscr{L}_{B} on 𝒳B\mathscr{X}_{B}. Since the regular locus of 𝒳B\mathscr{X}_{B} is open [GW10, Cor. 12.52] and since the fiber of 𝒳B\mathscr{X}_{B} over bb is contained in the regular locus, we may assume that 𝒳B\mathscr{X}_{B} is also regular by shrinking BB again.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.