2. Model metrics, semipositive metrics, and envelopes [0381]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context Β· Original author HTML
2. Model metrics, semipositive metrics, and envelopes
Let be a proper variety over a complete non-archimedean valued field .
2.1.
A model of is given by a proper flat scheme over together with an isomorphism between and the generic fiber of the -scheme which we read as an identification. Given a model of there is a canonical surjective reduction map where denotes the special fiber of over .
Let be a line bundle on the proper variety . A model of or briefly a model of is given by a model of together with a line bundle on and an isomorphism between and which we read as an identification.
Given a model of for some there is a unique metric on over which satisfies the following: Given an open subset of , a frame of over , and a section of over we write for some regular function on and get on . Such a metric on is called a model metric determined on .
2.2.
A model metric on induces a continuous function . The space of model functions
has a natural structure of a -vector space. We say that a model function is determined on a model if the model metric is determined on . A vertical divisor on determines a model of and an associated model function . Such model functions are called -model functions. Let denote a vertical ideal of . Let denote the exeptional divisor of the blowup of in . Then is called the -model function defined by the vertical ideal .
2.3.
Consider a model of the proper variety over . The rational vector space space is by definition the quotient of by the subspace generated by classes of line bundles such that for each closed curve in the special fiber . Note that is finite dimensional by applying [Kle66, Prop.Β IV.1.4] to . We define . An element (resp.Β is called nef if for all closed curves in . We call a line bundle on nef if the class of in is nef.
2.4.
We define as the direct limit
| (2.1) |
where runs over the isomorphism classes of models of . The space of closed -forms on is defined as . Let be a line bundle on . Let be a model metric on which is determined on by a model of . We multiply the class of in by which determines a well defined class called the curvature form of .
A closed -form is called semipositive if it is represented by a nef element for some model of . We say that a model metric on for a line bundle on is semipositive if the same holds for the curvature form .
2.5.
For we denote by
the set of -plurisubharmonic (-psh for short) model functions. Recall from [GM16, Prop.Β 3.12] that the set is stable under the formation of max.
2.6.
If is a proper variety over an arbitrary field , we denote by the rational vector space modulo numerical equivalence. Similarly, we denote by the real vector space modulo numerical equivalence. A class in is called ample if it is an -linear combination of classes induced by ample line bundles on . An element (resp.Β is called nef if for all closed curves in .
2.7.
The restriction maps induce a linear map . We call the de Rham class of .
Definition 2.8.
Let be a smooth projective variety over and with de Rham class . The -psh envelope of is the function
| (2.2) |
Note that is a real valued function if and only if there exists a -psh model function. For the existence of a -psh model function, it is necessary that the de Rham class is nef (see [GM16, 4.8] and [BFJ16a, Rem.Β 5.4]). If is ample, then there exists always a -psh model function and hence is a real valued function. If there is no -psh function, then by definition.
If the residue characteristic is zero and if the de Rham class is ample, our definition of is by [BFJ16a, Thm.Β 8.3 and Lemma 8.9] equivalent to the definition of Boucksom, Favre, and Jonsson in [BFJ16a, Def.Β 8.1] .
The next Proposition collects elementary properties of envelopes.
Proposition 2.9.
Let and .
- (i)
If then .
- (ii)
We have for all .
- (iii)
We have for each .
- (iv)
We have for each .
- (v)
If , then we have .
- (vi)
If is determined on a model , if the de Rham class is ample and if in , then uniformly on .
- (vii)
We have for all .
- (viii)
Assume . Then the envelope is continuous if and only if it is a uniform limit of -psh model functions.
Proof.
The proof of Properties (i)β(vi) in [BFJ16a, Prop.Β 8.2] works in our setup as well. Property (vii) is obvious for and an easy approximation argument then shows (vii) in general. We have seen that -psh model functions are closed under and hence the -psh model functions form a directed family. We conclude that (viii) follows from Diniβs Theorem for nets [Kel75, p.Β 239] and the definition of . β
Proposition 2.10.
Let be an ample line bundle on , an extension to a model and . For let
| (2.3) |
be the -th base ideal of and . Then and
| (2.4) |
pointwise on .
Proof.
This is shown as in Step 1 of the proof of [BFJ16a, Thm.Β 8.5]. β
Proposition 2.11.
Let be a finite normal extension and let be the natural projection. For and , we have
| (2.5) |
Proof.
Lemma 2.12.
Let be a line bundle on . Let be a finite purely inseparable extension and let be the natural projection. Then the map induces a bijection between the set of model metrics on and the set of model metrics on . Moreover this bijection identifies semipositive metrics on and on .
Proof.
We always consider the -topology induced by the strictly -affinoid domains. We claim that the map is a homeomorphism and that it also identifies the -topologies. In fact, this follows easily from the following claim:
Step 1: Let be a strictly affinoid space over and . Then the natural projection is a homeomorphism which identifies the -topologies.
Let be the degree of the purely inseparable field extension. It is clear that for every , there is with
| (2.6) |
This property easily shows that is a homeomorphism which we read now as an identification. Using that (2.6) holds also for rational functions on and on , we see that and have the same strictly rational domains. By the GerritzenβGrauert theorem [BGR84, Cor.Β 7.3.5/3], we deduce the Step 1.
Next we prove the bijective correspondence between the model metrics on and on . For this, it is enough to show that we have a bijective correspondence between model functions on and model functions on .
We recall from [GM16, Def.Β 2.8, 2.11] that a piecewise -linear function on a strictly -analytic space is a function such that there is a -covering of by strictly affinoid domains, analytic functions and non-zero with on for every .
By [GM16, Rem.Β 2.6, Prop.Β 2.10], model functions and piecewise -linear functions are the same and hence we have to check the bijective correspondence between piecewise -linear functions on and . This can be checked -locally and hence it is enough to prove the following:
Step 2: Using the same assumptions as in Step 1, the map is an isomorphism from the group of piecewise -linear functions on onto the group of piecewise -linear functions on .
Using the above definition of piecewise -linear functions, Step 1 and (2.6) yield easily Step 2.
To deduce the lemma, it remains to check that the identification between the model metrics on and preserves semipositivity. This is an easy consequence of the projection formula applied to finite morphisms between closed curves in the special fibers of models. β