ScalingStacks

Remark 3.1 . [0211]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Remark 3.1.

By a more careful inspection of above argument, one sees that it is possible to choose γp=max⁡((p+1)​(p+2),n​p)\gamma_{p}=\max((p+1)(p+2),np), but this is probably not sharp.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.