ScalingStacks

Proof. [020X]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

We will consider Δφ​(e−(F+λ​φ)+12​φ2​(|∇φ|2+K))\Delta_{\varphi}(e^{-(F+\lambda\varphi)+\frac{1}{2}\varphi^{2}}(|\nabla\varphi|^{2}+K)). Here λ>0\lambda>0, K>0K>0 are constants to be determined below. Then we have

(2.18) Δφ​(e−(F+λ​φ)+12​φ2​(|∇φ|2+K))\displaystyle\Delta_{\varphi}(e^{-(F+\lambda\varphi)+\frac{1}{2}\varphi^{2}}(|\nabla\varphi|^{2}+K))
=\displaystyle= Δφ​(e−(F+λ​φ)+12​φ2)​(|∇φ|2+K)+e−(F+λ​φ)+12​φ2​Δφ​(|∇φ|2)\displaystyle\Delta_{\varphi}(e^{-(F+\lambda\varphi)+\frac{1}{2}\varphi^{2}})(|\nabla\varphi|^{2}+K)+e^{-(F+\lambda\varphi)+\frac{1}{2}\varphi^{2}}\Delta_{\varphi}(|\nabla\varphi|^{2})
+2​e−(F+λ​φ)+12​φ21+φi​i¯​R​e​((−Fi−λ​φi+φ​φi)​(|∇φ|2)i¯).\displaystyle\qquad\qquad+\frac{2e^{-(F+\lambda\varphi)+\frac{1}{2}\varphi^{2}}}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}Re\big((-F_{i}-\lambda\varphi_{i}+\varphi\varphi_{i})(|\nabla\varphi|^{2})_{\bar{i}}\big).

For simplicity of notation, set

A⁡(F,φ)=−(F+λ​φ)+12​φ2.A(F,\varphi)=-(F+\lambda\varphi)+\frac{1}{2}\varphi^{2}.

Similar as before, we may calculate:

(2.19) Δφ​(eA⁡(F,φ))\displaystyle\Delta_{\varphi}(e^{A(F,\varphi)})
=\displaystyle= eA​|−Fi−λ​φi+φ​φi|21+φi​i¯+eA​(−Δφ​(F+λ​φ)+φ​Δφ​φ)+eA​|φi|21+φi​i¯\displaystyle e^{A}\frac{|-F_{i}-\lambda\varphi_{i}+\varphi\varphi_{i}|^{2}}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}+e^{A}\big(-\Delta_{\varphi}(F+\lambda\varphi)+\varphi\Delta_{\varphi}\varphi\big)+e^{A}\frac{|\varphi_{i}|^{2}}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}
=\displaystyle= eA​|−Fi−λ​φi+φ​φi|21+φi​i¯+eA​(R¯−λ​n+n​φ+∑iλ−Ri​i¯−φ1+φi​i¯)+eA​|φi|21+φi​i¯.\displaystyle e^{A}\frac{|-F_{i}-\lambda\varphi_{i}+\varphi\varphi_{i}|^{2}}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}+e^{A}\bigg(\underline{R}-\lambda n+n\varphi+\sum_{i}\frac{\lambda-R_{i\bar{i}}-\varphi}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}\bigg)+\frac{e^{A}|\varphi_{i}|^{2}}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}.

Recall the calculation in (2.7):

(2.20) Δφ​(|∇φ|2)=Ri​i¯​α​β¯​φα​φβ¯1+φi​i¯+|φi​α|21+φi​i¯+φi​i¯21+φi​i¯+Fα¯​φα+Fα​φα¯≥−C2.21|∇φ|∑i2⁡11+φi​i¯+|φi​α|21+φi​i¯+φi​i¯21+φi​i¯+(−2​λ+2​φ)​|∇φ|2+2​R​e​((Fα+λ​φα−φ​φα)​φα¯).\begin{split}\Delta_{\varphi}(|\nabla\varphi|^{2})&=\frac{R_{i\bar{i}\alpha\bar{\beta}}\varphi_{\alpha}\varphi_{\bar{\beta}}}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}+\frac{|\varphi_{i\alpha}|^{2}}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}+\frac{\varphi_{i\bar{i}}^{2}}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}+F_{\bar{\alpha}}\varphi_{\alpha}+F_{\alpha}\varphi_{\bar{\alpha}}\\ &\geq-C_{2.21}|\nabla\varphi|^{2}\sum_{i}\frac{1}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}+\frac{|\varphi_{i\alpha}|^{2}}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}+\frac{\varphi_{i\bar{i}}^{2}}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}\\ &+(-2\lambda+2\varphi)|\nabla\varphi|^{2}+2Re\big((F_{\alpha}+\lambda\varphi_{\alpha}-\varphi\varphi_{\alpha})\varphi_{\bar{\alpha}}\big).\end{split}

Again C2.21C_{2.21} depends only on curvature bound of gg. Also

(|∇φ|2)i¯=φα​φα¯​i¯+φi¯​φi​i¯,(|∇φ|2)i=φα¯​φα​i+φi​φi​i¯.(|\nabla\varphi|^{2})_{\bar{i}}=\varphi_{\alpha}\varphi_{\bar{\alpha}\bar{i}}+\varphi_{\bar{i}}\varphi_{i\bar{i}},\,\,(|\nabla\varphi|^{2})_{i}=\varphi_{\bar{\alpha}}\varphi_{\alpha i}+\varphi_{i}\varphi_{i\bar{i}}.

Hence if we plug in (2.19) and (2.20) back to (2.18), we obtain:

(2.21) Δφ​(eA​(|∇φ|2+K))​e−A≥|∇φ(F+λ​φ)−φ​∇φφ|2​(|∇φ|2+K)+|∇φφ|2​(|∇φ|2+K)+(R¯−λ​n+n​φ+∑iλ−Ri​i¯−φ1+φi​i¯)​(|∇φ|2+K)+−C2.21​|∇φ|2+|φi​α|2+φi​i¯21+φi​i¯+(−2​λ+2​φ)​|∇φ|2+2​R​e​((Fα+λ​φα−φ​φα)​φα¯)+2​R​e​((−Fi−λ​φi+φ​φi)​(φα​φα¯​i¯+φi¯​φi​i¯))1+φi​i¯.\begin{split}&\quad\Delta_{\varphi}(e^{A}(|\nabla\varphi|^{2}+K))e^{-A}\\ &\geq|\nabla_{\varphi}(F+\lambda\varphi)-\varphi\nabla_{\varphi}\varphi|^{2}(|\nabla\varphi|^{2}+K)+|\nabla_{\varphi}\varphi|^{2}(|\nabla\varphi|^{2}+K)\\ &+\big(\underline{R}-\lambda n+n\varphi+\sum_{i}\frac{\lambda-R_{i\bar{i}}-\varphi}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}\big)(|\nabla\varphi|^{2}+K)+\frac{-C_{2.21}|\nabla\varphi|^{2}+|\varphi_{i\alpha}|^{2}+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}^{2}}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}\\ &+(-2\lambda+2\varphi)|\nabla\varphi|^{2}+2Re\big((F_{\alpha}+\lambda\varphi_{\alpha}-\varphi\varphi_{\alpha})\varphi_{\bar{\alpha}}\big)\\ &\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad+\frac{2Re\big((-F_{i}-\lambda\varphi_{i}+\varphi\varphi_{i})(\varphi_{\alpha}\varphi_{\bar{\alpha}\bar{i}}+\varphi_{\bar{i}}\varphi_{i\bar{i}})\big)}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}.\end{split}

We notice the following complete square in the above sum:

(2.22) 11+φi​i¯​|φi​α−(Fi+λ​φi−φ​φi)​φα|2=|φi​α|21+φi​i¯+2​R​e​((−Fi−λ​φi+φ​φi)​φα​φα¯​i¯)1+φi​i¯+|−Fi−λ​φi+φ​φi|2​|∇φ|21+φi​i¯.\begin{split}&\frac{1}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}|\varphi_{i\alpha}-\big(F_{i}+\lambda\varphi_{i}-\varphi\varphi_{i}\big)\varphi_{\alpha}|^{2}\\ &=\frac{|\varphi_{i\alpha}|^{2}}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}+\frac{2Re\big((-F_{i}-\lambda\varphi_{i}+\varphi\varphi_{i})\varphi_{\alpha}\varphi_{\bar{\alpha}\bar{i}}\big)}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}+\frac{|-F_{i}-\lambda\varphi_{i}+\varphi\varphi_{i}|^{2}|\nabla\varphi|^{2}}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}.\end{split}

We will drop this complete square in the following. Next we observe a crucial cancellation, which is the key point of this argument. We look at the last two terms in (2.21) and observe:

(2.23) (Fα+λ​φα−φ​φα)​φα¯+(−Fi−λ​φi+φ​φi)​φi¯​φi​i¯1+φi​i¯=(Fi+λ​φi−φ​φi)​φi¯1+φi​i¯.(F_{\alpha}+\lambda\varphi_{\alpha}-\varphi\varphi_{\alpha})\varphi_{\bar{\alpha}}+\frac{(-F_{i}-\lambda\varphi_{i}+\varphi\varphi_{i})\varphi_{\bar{i}}\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}=\frac{(F_{i}+\lambda\varphi_{i}-\varphi\varphi_{i})\varphi_{\bar{i}}}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}.

Hence we have

(2.24) Δφ​(eA​(|∇φ|2+K))​e−A≥K​|−Fi−λ​φi+φ​φi|21+φi​i¯+|φi|2​(|∇φ|2+K)1+φi​i¯+∑iλ−Ri​i¯−φ1+φi​i¯(|∇φ|2+K)+(R¯−λn+nφ)(|∇φ|2+K)−C2.21|∇φ|∑i2⁡11+φi​i¯+φi​i¯21+φi​i¯+(−2​λ+2​φ)​|∇φ|2+2​R​e​((Fi+λ​φi−φ​φi)​φi¯1+φi​i¯).\begin{split}&\Delta_{\varphi}(e^{A}(|\nabla\varphi|^{2}+K))e^{-A}\geq K\frac{|-F_{i}-\lambda\varphi_{i}+\varphi\varphi_{i}|^{2}}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}+\frac{|\varphi_{i}|^{2}(|\nabla\varphi|^{2}+K)}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}\\ &+\sum_{i}\frac{\lambda-R_{i\bar{i}}-\varphi}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}(|\nabla\varphi|^{2}+K)+\bigg(\underline{R}-\lambda n+n\varphi\bigg)(|\nabla\varphi|^{2}+K)\\ &-C_{2.21}|\nabla\varphi|^{2}\sum_{i}\frac{1}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}+\frac{\varphi_{i\bar{i}}^{2}}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}+(-2\lambda+2\varphi)|\nabla\varphi|^{2}+2Re\bigg(\frac{(F_{i}+\lambda\varphi_{i}-\varphi\varphi_{i})\varphi_{\bar{i}}}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}\bigg).\end{split}

Now we make the choices of λ\lambda, KK. We choose λ=10​(supM|Ri​i¯|+‖φ‖0+C2.21+1)\lambda=10(\sup_{M}|R_{i\bar{i}}|+||\varphi||_{0}+C_{2.21}+1) and K=10K=10. With this choice, we now estimate the terms in (2.24), with various constants CiC_{i} which depends only on the curvature bound of gg and ‖φ‖0||\varphi||_{0}.

(2.25) (R¯−λ​n+n​φ)​(|∇φ|2+K)≥−C2.31​(|∇φ|2+1).\big(\underline{R}-\lambda n+n\varphi\big)(|\nabla\varphi|^{2}+K)\geq-C_{2.31}(|\nabla\varphi|^{2}+1).
(2.26) (−2​λ+2​φ)​|∇φ|2≥−C2.32​|∇φ|2.(-2\lambda+2\varphi)|\nabla\varphi|^{2}\geq-C_{2.32}|\nabla\varphi|^{2}.
(2.27) |(Fi+λ​φi−φ​φi)​φi¯|1+φi​i¯≤12​|Fi+λ​φi−φ​φi|21+φi​i¯+12​|φi|21+φi​i¯≤12​|Fi+λ​φi−φ​φi|21+φi​i¯+12​|∇φ|2​∑i11+φi​i¯.\begin{split}\frac{|(F_{i}+\lambda\varphi_{i}-\varphi\varphi_{i})\varphi_{\bar{i}}|}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}&\leq\frac{1}{2}\frac{|F_{i}+\lambda\varphi_{i}-\varphi\varphi_{i}|^{2}}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}+\frac{1}{2}\frac{|\varphi_{i}|^{2}}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}\\ &\leq\frac{1}{2}\frac{|F_{i}+\lambda\varphi_{i}-\varphi\varphi_{i}|^{2}}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}+\frac{1}{2}|\nabla\varphi|^{2}\sum_{i}\frac{1}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}.\end{split}
(2.28) ∑iλ−Ri​i¯−φ1+φi​i¯​(|∇φ|2+K)−C2.21​|∇φ|2​∑i11+φi​i¯≥10|∇φ|∑i2⁡11+φi​i¯.\sum_{i}\frac{\lambda-R_{i\bar{i}}-\varphi}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}(|\nabla\varphi|^{2}+K)-C_{2.21}|\nabla\varphi|^{2}\sum_{i}\frac{1}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}\geq 10|\nabla\varphi|^{2}\sum_{i}\frac{1}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}.
(2.29) φi​i¯21+φi​i¯≥0.\frac{\varphi_{i\bar{i}}^{2}}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}\geq 0.

Combining all these estimates, we obtain from (2.24) that

(2.30) Δφ​(eA​(|∇φ|2+K))≥eA​(|φi|2​|∇φ|21+φi​i¯+9​|∇φ|2​∑i11+φi​i¯−C2.33​(|∇φ|2+1)).\Delta_{\varphi}(e^{A}(|\nabla\varphi|^{2}+K))\geq e^{A}\big(\frac{|\varphi_{i}|^{2}|\nabla\varphi|^{2}}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}+9|\nabla\varphi|^{2}\sum_{i}\frac{1}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}-C_{2.33}(|\nabla\varphi|^{2}+1)\big).

Here C2.33C_{2.33} depends only on curvature bound of gg and ‖φ‖0||\varphi||_{0}. Using Young’s inequality, we have,

|∇φ|2n​e−Fn≤∑i|φi|2n(1+φi​i¯)1n⋅(1+φi​i¯)1n​e−Fn≤1n​∑i|φi|21+φi​i¯+n−1n​∑i(1+φi​i¯)1n−1​e−Fn−1≤(n−1)​(|φi|21+φi​i¯+1n​∑i(1+φi​i¯)1n−1​e−Fn−1)≤(n−1)​(|φi|21+φi​i¯+(n+Δ​φ)1n−1​e−Fn−1)≤(n−1)​(|φi|21+φi​i¯+∑i11+φi​i¯).\begin{split}|\nabla\varphi|^{\frac{2}{n}}e^{-\frac{F}{n}}&\leq\sum_{i}\frac{|\varphi_{i}|^{\frac{2}{n}}}{(1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}})^{\frac{1}{n}}}\cdot(1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}})^{\frac{1}{n}}e^{-\frac{F}{n}}\\ &\leq\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i}\frac{|\varphi_{i}|^{2}}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}+\frac{n-1}{n}\sum_{i}(1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}})^{\frac{1}{n-1}}e^{-\frac{F}{n-1}}\\ &\leq(n-1)\big(\frac{|\varphi_{i}|^{2}}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}+\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i}(1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}})^{\frac{1}{n-1}}e^{-\frac{F}{n-1}}\big)\\ &\leq(n-1)\big(\frac{|\varphi_{i}|^{2}}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}+(n+\Delta\varphi)^{\frac{1}{n-1}}e^{-\frac{F}{n-1}}\big)\\ &\leq(n-1)\big(\frac{|\varphi_{i}|^{2}}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}+\sum_{i}\frac{1}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}\big).\end{split}

Thus,

|φi|2​|∇φ|21+φi​i¯+|∇φ|2​∑i11+φi​i¯≥1n−1​|∇φ|2+2n​e−Fn.\begin{split}\frac{|\varphi_{i}|^{2}|\nabla\varphi|^{2}}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}+|\nabla\varphi|^{2}\sum_{i}\frac{1}{1+\varphi_{i\bar{i}}}&\geq\frac{1}{n-1}|\nabla\varphi|^{2+\frac{2}{n}}e^{-\frac{F}{n}}.\end{split}

Hence we get from (2.30) that

(2.31) Δφ​(eA​(|∇φ|2+K))≥e−C​φ+12​φ2​(e−(1+1n)​F​|∇φ|2+2n−C2.33​e−F​|∇φ|2−C2.33​e−F)=e−C​φ+12​φ2​((e−F​|∇φ|2)1+1n−C2.33​e−F​|∇φ|2−C2.33​e−F).\begin{split}\Delta_{\varphi}(e^{A}(|\nabla\varphi|^{2}+K))&\geq e^{-C\varphi+\frac{1}{2}\varphi^{2}}\big(e^{-(1+\frac{1}{n})F}|\nabla\varphi|^{2+\frac{2}{n}}-C_{2.33}e^{-F}|\nabla\varphi|^{2}-C_{2.33}e^{-F}\big)\\ &=e^{-C\varphi+\frac{1}{2}\varphi^{2}}\big((e^{-F}|\nabla\varphi|^{2})^{1+\frac{1}{n}}-C_{2.33}e^{-F}|\nabla\varphi|^{2}-C_{2.33}e^{-F}\big).\end{split}

Suppose that the function e−(F+C​φ)+12​φ2​(|∇φ|2+K)e^{-(F+C\varphi)+\frac{1}{2}\varphi^{2}}(|\nabla\varphi|^{2}+K) achieves maximum at pp. Then at point pp, we have

(2.32) 0≥(e−F​|∇φ|2)1+1n−C2.33​e−F​|∇φ|2−C2.33​e−F.0\geq(e^{-F}|\nabla\varphi|^{2})^{1+\frac{1}{n}}-C_{2.33}e^{-F}|\nabla\varphi|^{2}-C_{2.33}e^{-F}.

Recall Proposition 2.1 gives an estimate for e−Fe^{-F} which depends only on ‖φ‖0||\varphi||_{0} and the curvature bound of gg. Therefore, we get a bound for e−F​|∇φ|2​(p)e^{-F}|\nabla\varphi|^{2}(p) with the same dependence. Hence we have a bound for e−(F+λ​φ)+12​φ2​(|∇φ|2+K)​(p)e^{-(F+\lambda\varphi)+\frac{1}{2}\varphi^{2}}(|\nabla\varphi|^{2}+K)(p), with the dependence as stated in the theorem.

But this function achieves maximum at pp, so we are done. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.