We are then left with only the term with , which is
|
|
|
and if we expand the term , we get
|
|
|
and the second term is zero because is the pullback of a form from the base. We are then left with the term
| (4.13) |
|
|
|
which we need to further estimate. Using (4.8) we see that, up to taking a further subsequence, the functions
converge to in the topology,
and (4.10) implies that the functions also converge to
uniformly.
We can then rewrite (4.13) as
|
|
|
Using (2.6) we see that as goes to zero the coefficient converges to
|
|
|
On the other hand we have
|
|
|
The term with is independent of , while any term with can be written as
| (4.14) |
|
|
|
The -form is supported in and is uniformly bounded by (4.9), and the functions converge uniformly to , and so along the sequence the term (4.14) has the same limit as
|
|
|
But this is equal to
|
|
|
and repeating the same argument times we see that along the sequence
the term (4.14) converges to
|
|
|
It follows that along the sequence the term (4.13) converges to
|
|
|
and using (4.6), (4.7) we get
|
|
|
We then integrate first along the fibers and get
|
|
|
and since is cohomologous to , we get
|
|
|
which is just the weak form of (4.3). This shows that any weak limit of as satisfies (4.3) weakly, and we have already remarked that we can write with in .
By Kołodziej’s uniqueness of weak solutions of (4.3) (see [ST2, Theorem 3.2] and [EGZ1, Z]), we must have , and so the whole sequence converges weakly to as . Then the bound (2.9) implies that actually converges to in the topology on .
∎