ScalingStacks

Verified tagged author-source HTML · 0905.4718v1 · cited publication edition alignment unverified.

We are then left with only the term with k=mk=m, which is

1at​∫Xη​(nm)​(ω0+−1​∂∂¯​φt¯)m∧(t​ωX+−1​∂∂¯​(φt−φt¯))n−m,\frac{1}{a_{t}}\int_{X}\eta\binom{n}{m}(\omega_{0}+\sqrt{-1}\partial\overline{\partial}\underline{\varphi_{t}})^{m}\wedge(t\omega_{X}+\sqrt{-1}\partial\overline{\partial}(\varphi_{t}-\underline{\varphi_{t}}))^{n-m},

and if we expand the term (t​ωX+−1​∂∂¯​(φt−φt¯))n−m(t\omega_{X}+\sqrt{-1}\partial\overline{\partial}(\varphi_{t}-\underline{\varphi_{t}}))^{n-m}, we get

1at∫Xη​(nm)​(ω0+−1​∂∂¯​φt¯)m∧(t​ωX)n−m+1at∫X−1∂∂¯η∧(ω0+−1∂∂¯φt¯)m∧…,\begin{split}\frac{1}{a_{t}}&\int_{X}\eta\binom{n}{m}(\omega_{0}+\sqrt{-1}\partial\overline{\partial}\underline{\varphi_{t}})^{m}\wedge(t\omega_{X})^{n-m}\\ &+\frac{1}{a_{t}}\int_{X}\sqrt{-1}\partial\overline{\partial}\eta\wedge(\omega_{0}+\sqrt{-1}\partial\overline{\partial}\underline{\varphi_{t}})^{m}\wedge\dots,\end{split}

and the second term is zero because ∂∂¯​η\partial\overline{\partial}\eta is the pullback of a form from the base. We are then left with the term

(4.13) 1at​∫Xη​(nm)​(ω0+−1​∂∂¯​φt¯)m∧(t​ωX)n−m,\frac{1}{a_{t}}\int_{X}\eta\binom{n}{m}(\omega_{0}+\sqrt{-1}\partial\overline{\partial}\underline{\varphi_{t}})^{m}\wedge(t\omega_{X})^{n-m},

which we need to further estimate. Using (4.8) we see that, up to taking a further subsequence, the functions φti\varphi_{t_{i}} converge to φ^\hat{\varphi} in the C1,β​(K)C^{1,\beta}(K) topology, and (4.10) implies that the functions φti¯\underline{\varphi_{t_{i}}} also converge to φ^\hat{\varphi} uniformly. We can then rewrite (4.13) as

tn−m​(nm)at​∫Xη​(ω0+−1​∂∂¯​φt¯)m∧ωXn−m.\frac{t^{n-m}\binom{n}{m}}{a_{t}}\int_{X}\eta(\omega_{0}+\sqrt{-1}\partial\overline{\partial}\underline{\varphi_{t}})^{m}\wedge\omega_{X}^{n-m}.

Using (2.6) we see that as tt goes to zero the coefficient tn−m​(nm)at\frac{t^{n-m}\binom{n}{m}}{a_{t}} converges to

∫Xω1n∫Xω0m∧ωXn−m.\frac{\int_{X}\omega_{1}^{n}}{\int_{X}\omega_{0}^{m}\wedge\omega_{X}^{n-m}}.

On the other hand we have

∫Xη​(ω0+−1​∂∂¯​φt¯)m∧ωXn−m=∑k=0m(mk)​∫Xη​ω0m−k∧(−1​∂∂¯​φt¯)k∧ωXn−m.\int_{X}\eta(\omega_{0}+\sqrt{-1}\partial\overline{\partial}\underline{\varphi_{t}})^{m}\wedge\omega_{X}^{n-m}=\sum_{k=0}^{m}\binom{m}{k}\int_{X}\eta\omega_{0}^{m-k}\wedge(\sqrt{-1}\partial\overline{\partial}\underline{\varphi_{t}})^{k}\wedge\omega_{X}^{n-m}.

The term with k=0k=0 is independent of tt, while any term with k>0k>0 can be written as

(4.14) ∫Xφt¯​−1​∂∂¯​η∧ω0m−k∧(−1​∂∂¯​φt¯)k−1∧ωXn−m.\int_{X}\underline{\varphi_{t}}\sqrt{-1}\partial\overline{\partial}\eta\wedge\omega_{0}^{m-k}\wedge(\sqrt{-1}\partial\overline{\partial}\underline{\varphi_{t}})^{k-1}\wedge\omega_{X}^{n-m}.

The (n,n)(n,n)-form −1​∂∂¯​η∧ω0m−k∧(−1​∂∂¯​φt¯)k−1∧ωXn−m\sqrt{-1}\partial\overline{\partial}\eta\wedge\omega_{0}^{m-k}\wedge(\sqrt{-1}\partial\overline{\partial}\underline{\varphi_{t}})^{k-1}\wedge\omega_{X}^{n-m} is supported in KK and is uniformly bounded by (4.9), and the functions φti¯\underline{\varphi_{t_{i}}} converge uniformly to φ^\hat{\varphi}, and so along the sequence tit_{i} the term (4.14) has the same limit as

∫Xφ^​−1​∂∂¯​η∧ω0m−k∧(−1​∂∂¯​φt¯)k−1∧ωXn−m.\int_{X}\hat{\varphi}\sqrt{-1}\partial\overline{\partial}\eta\wedge\omega_{0}^{m-k}\wedge(\sqrt{-1}\partial\overline{\partial}\underline{\varphi_{t}})^{k-1}\wedge\omega_{X}^{n-m}.

But this is equal to

∫Xφt¯​−1​∂∂¯​η∧ω0m−k∧(−1​∂∂¯​φt¯)k−2∧−1​∂∂¯​φ^∧ωXn−m,\int_{X}\underline{\varphi_{t}}\sqrt{-1}\partial\overline{\partial}\eta\wedge\omega_{0}^{m-k}\wedge(\sqrt{-1}\partial\overline{\partial}\underline{\varphi_{t}})^{k-2}\wedge\sqrt{-1}\partial\overline{\partial}\hat{\varphi}\wedge\omega_{X}^{n-m},

and repeating the same argument k−1k-1 times we see that along the sequence tit_{i} the term (4.14) converges to

∫Xη​ω0m−k∧(−1​∂∂¯​φ^)k∧ωXn−m.\int_{X}\eta\omega_{0}^{m-k}\wedge(\sqrt{-1}\partial\overline{\partial}\hat{\varphi})^{k}\wedge\omega_{X}^{n-m}.

It follows that along the sequence tit_{i} the term (4.13) converges to

∫Xω1n∫Xω0m∧ωXn−m​∫Xη​(ω0+−1​∂∂¯​φ^)m∧ωXn−m,\frac{\int_{X}\omega_{1}^{n}}{\int_{X}\omega_{0}^{m}\wedge\omega_{X}^{n-m}}\int_{X}\eta(\omega_{0}+\sqrt{-1}\partial\overline{\partial}\hat{\varphi})^{m}\wedge\omega_{X}^{n-m},

and using (4.6), (4.7) we get

∫Xη​F​ωS​Fn−m∧ω0m=∫Xω1n∫Xω0m∧ωXn−m​∫Xη​(ω0+−1​∂∂¯​φ^)m∧ωXn−m.\int_{X}\eta F\omega_{SF}^{n-m}\wedge\omega_{0}^{m}=\frac{\int_{X}\omega_{1}^{n}}{\int_{X}\omega_{0}^{m}\wedge\omega_{X}^{n-m}}\int_{X}\eta(\omega_{0}+\sqrt{-1}\partial\overline{\partial}\hat{\varphi})^{m}\wedge\omega_{X}^{n-m}.

We then integrate first along the fibers and get

∫Yη​F​ωYm​(∫XyωS​F,yn−m)=∫Xω1n∫Xω0m∧ωXn−m​∫Yη​(ωY+−1​∂∂¯​φ^)m​(∫Xyωyn−m),\begin{split}\int_{Y}&\eta F\omega_{Y}^{m}\left(\int_{X_{y}}\omega_{SF,y}^{n-m}\right)\\ &=\frac{\int_{X}\omega_{1}^{n}}{\int_{X}\omega_{0}^{m}\wedge\omega_{X}^{n-m}}\int_{Y}\eta(\omega_{Y}+\sqrt{-1}\partial\overline{\partial}\hat{\varphi})^{m}\left(\int_{X_{y}}\omega_{y}^{n-m}\right),\end{split}

and since ωy\omega_{y} is cohomologous to ωS​F,y\omega_{SF,y}, we get

∫Yη​F​ωYm=∫Xω1n∫Xω0m∧ωXn−m​∫Yη​(ωY+−1​∂∂¯​φ^)m,\int_{Y}\eta F\omega_{Y}^{m}=\frac{\int_{X}\omega_{1}^{n}}{\int_{X}\omega_{0}^{m}\wedge\omega_{X}^{n-m}}\int_{Y}\eta(\omega_{Y}+\sqrt{-1}\partial\overline{\partial}\hat{\varphi})^{m},

which is just the weak form of (4.3). This shows that any weak limit ω^\hat{\omega} of ω~t\tilde{\omega}_{t} as t→0t\to 0 satisfies (4.3) weakly, and we have already remarked that we can write ω^=ωY+−1​∂∂¯​φ^\hat{\omega}=\omega_{Y}+\sqrt{-1}\partial\overline{\partial}\hat{\varphi} with φ^\hat{\varphi} in L∞L^{\infty}. By Kołodziej’s uniqueness of L∞L^{\infty} weak solutions of (4.3) (see [ST2, Theorem 3.2] and [EGZ1, Z]), we must have φ^=ψ\hat{\varphi}=\psi, and so the whole sequence ω~t\tilde{\omega}_{t} converges weakly to ω\omega as t→0t\to 0. Then the bound (2.9) implies that φt\varphi_{t} actually converges to ψ\psi in the Cl​o​c1,βC^{1,\beta}_{loc} topology on X\SX\backslash S. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.