ScalingStacks

Verified tagged author-source HTML · 0710.4579v1 · cited publication edition alignment unverified.

Fix once and for all an ε>0\varepsilon>0 small enough so that Kodaira’s lemma holds. First of all notice that the classes αt−ε​E=κεt\alpha_{t}-\varepsilon E=\kappa_{\varepsilon}^{t} are all Kähler when tt is close to 11. Choose a Kähler form χε∈κε\chi_{\varepsilon}\in\kappa_{\varepsilon}, let σ∈H0​(X,𝒪X​(E))\sigma\in H^{0}(X,\mathcal{O}_{X}(E)) be the canonical section, and fix a Hermitian metric |⋅||\cdot| on EE such that the following Poicaré-Lelong equation holds

(4.4) ω−ε⁡[E]=χε−ε​−1​∂∂¯​log⁡|σ|,\omega-\varepsilon[E]=\chi_{\varepsilon}-\varepsilon\sqrt{-1}\partial\overline{\partial}\log|\sigma|,

where [E][E] denotes the current of integration on EE. Then we have

βt−ε⁡[E]=χε+(βt−ω)−ε​−1​∂∂¯​log⁡|σ|,\beta_{t}-\varepsilon[E]=\chi_{\varepsilon}+(\beta_{t}-\omega)-\varepsilon\sqrt{-1}\partial\overline{\partial}\log|\sigma|,

and χεt=χε+(βt−ω)\chi_{\varepsilon}^{t}=\chi_{\varepsilon}+(\beta_{t}-\omega) is Kähler for tt close to 11. There are smooth functions φt\varphi_{t} solutions of

(4.5) ωtn=(βt+−1​∂∂¯​φt)n=αtn​Ω,\omega_{t}^{n}=(\beta_{t}+\sqrt{-1}\partial\overline{\partial}\varphi_{t})^{n}=\alpha_{t}^{n}\Omega,

where the positive constants αtn\alpha_{t}^{n} approach αn\alpha^{n} as tt goes to 11, and supXφt=0\sup_{X}\varphi_{t}=0. We apply Theorem 2.1 and Proposition 3.1 of [EGZ] again, and get uniform estimates ‖φt‖C0≤C0\|\varphi_{t}\|_{C^{0}}\leq C_{0} independent of tt. Outside EE we have

βt=χεt−ε​−1​∂∂¯​log⁡|σ|,\beta_{t}=\chi_{\varepsilon}^{t}-\varepsilon\sqrt{-1}\partial\overline{\partial}\log|\sigma|,

so that the functions ψt=φt−ε​log⁡|σ|\psi_{t}=\varphi_{t}-\varepsilon\log|\sigma| solve

(4.6) (χεt+−1​∂∂¯​ψt)n=αtn​Ω=eFεt​(χεt)n(\chi_{\varepsilon}^{t}+\sqrt{-1}\partial\overline{\partial}\psi_{t})^{n}=\alpha_{t}^{n}\Omega=e^{F_{\varepsilon}^{t}}(\chi_{\varepsilon}^{t})^{n}

there, for some appropriate smooth functions FεtF_{\varepsilon}^{t}, defined on the whole of XX. As tt approaches 11, the Kähler forms χεt\chi_{\varepsilon}^{t} are uniformly bounded in the smooth topology (with eigenvalues bounded away from 00 uniformly), and so are the functions FεtF_{\varepsilon}^{t}. Yau’s second order estimates [Y2] for the Monge-Ampère equation (4.6) give

(4.7) △t′​(e−A​ψt​(n+△t​ψt))≥e−A​ψt​(−C1−C2​(n+△t​ψt)+(n+△t​ψt)nn−1),\triangle^{\prime}_{t}(e^{-A\psi_{t}}(n+\triangle_{t}\psi_{t}))\geq e^{-A\psi_{t}}\left(-C_{1}-C_{2}(n+\triangle_{t}\psi_{t})+(n+\triangle_{t}\psi_{t})^{\frac{n}{n-1}}\right),

where A,C1A,C_{1} and C2C_{2} are uniform positive constants, △t\triangle_{t} is the Laplacian of χεt\chi_{\varepsilon}^{t} and △t′\triangle^{\prime}_{t} is the Laplacian of χεt+−1​∂∂¯​ψt\chi_{\varepsilon}^{t}+\sqrt{-1}\partial\overline{\partial}\psi_{t}. Now notice that on X\EX\backslash E we have

e−A​ψt​(n+△t​ψt)=|σ|A​ε​e−A​φt​(n+△t​φt−ε​△t​log⁡|σ|),e^{-A\psi_{t}}(n+\triangle_{t}\psi_{t})=|\sigma|^{A\varepsilon}e^{-A\varphi_{t}}(n+\triangle_{t}\varphi_{t}-\varepsilon\triangle_{t}\log|\sigma|),

and

|△t​log⁡|σ||≤C,\left|\triangle_{t}\log|\sigma|\right|\leq C,

for some uniform constant CC. Hence the function e−A​ψt​(n+△t​ψt)e^{-A\psi_{t}}(n+\triangle_{t}\psi_{t}) goes to zero when we approach EE, and so its maximum will be attained. The maximum principle applied to (4.7) then gives

n+△t​ψt≤C​eA⁡(ψt−infX\Eψt),n+\triangle_{t}\psi_{t}\leq Ce^{A(\psi_{t}-\inf_{X\backslash E}\psi_{t})},

on the whole of X\EX\backslash E. But noticing that infX\Eψt≥infXφt−C\inf_{X\backslash E}\psi_{t}\geq\inf_{X}\varphi_{t}-C for a uniform constant CC, and recalling that |φt|≤C0|\varphi_{t}|\leq C_{0}, we get

n+△t​φt≤C+n+△t​ψt≤C⁡(1+|σ|−A​ε).n+\triangle_{t}\varphi_{t}\leq C+n+\triangle_{t}\psi_{t}\leq C(1+|\sigma|^{-A\varepsilon}).

This gives uniform interior C2C^{2} estimates of φt\varphi_{t} and ψt\psi_{t} on compact sets of X\EX\backslash E. Then the Harnack estimate of Evans-Krylov gives uniform C2,γC^{2,\gamma} estimates, for some 0<γ<10<\gamma<1, and a standard bootstrapping argument gives uniform Ck,γC^{k,\gamma} estimates for all k≥2k\geq 2, on compact sets of X\EX\backslash E, independent of t<1t<1. Thus the family (φt)(\varphi_{t}) is precompact Ck,γ′​(X\E)C^{k,\gamma^{\prime}}(X\backslash E) for any 0<γ′<γ0<\gamma^{\prime}<\gamma, and any limit point ψ\psi belongs to P​S​H​(X\E,ω)PSH(X\backslash E,\omega), it satisfies

(ω+−1​∂∂¯​ψ)n=αn​Ω(\omega+\sqrt{-1}\partial\overline{\partial}\psi)^{n}=\alpha^{n}\Omega

on X\EX\backslash E, and is bounded near EE. Hence ψ\psi extends to a bounded function in P​S​H​(X,ω)PSH(X,\omega) and the above Monge-Ampère equation holds on XX because the Borel measure (ω+−1​∂∂¯​ψ)n(\omega+\sqrt{-1}\partial\overline{\partial}\psi)^{n} doesn’t charge the analytic set EE. Then by the uniqueness part of Theorem 2.1 of [EGZ], we must have ψ=φ\psi=\varphi. This implies that φt→φ\varphi_{t}\to\varphi in C∞C^{\infty} on compact sets of X\EX\backslash E, and that φ\varphi is smooth there.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.