ScalingStacks

Verified tagged author-source HTML · 0710.4579v1 · cited publication edition alignment unverified.

2. Some facts from algebraic geometry

In this section we will review some definitions and results from algebraic geometry, mainly from Mori’s Program, that will be used in the proof.

Let XX be a compact Calabi-Yau n−n-fold, that is a compact Kähler manifold of dimension nn and such that c1​(X)=0c_{1}(X)=0 in H2​(X,ℝ)H^{2}(X,\mathbb{R}). We don’t insist that XX is simply connected. Notice that it follows that a​KX≅𝒪XaK_{X}\cong\mathcal{O}_{X} for some integer a>0a>0: in fact by Theorem 1 in [Be] a finite unramified a:1a:1 cover of XX, p:X~→Xp:\tilde{X}\to X, has trivial canonical bundle. But we have that p∗​KX≅KX~≅𝒪X~p^{*}K_{X}\cong K_{\tilde{X}}\cong\mathcal{O}_{\tilde{X}} and then Lemma 16.2 in [BHPV] implies that a​KX≅𝒪XaK_{X}\cong\mathcal{O}_{X}. This can be rewritten as KX∼ℚ0K_{X}\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}0 where ∼ℚ\sim_{\mathbb{Q}} indicates ℚ\mathbb{Q}-linear equivalence of Cartier ℚ\mathbb{Q}-divisors. For the rest of this section we will assume that XX is projective.

00EX

Definition 2.1. A projective variety XX has canonical singularities if it is normal, if r​KXrK_{X} is Cartier for some r≥1r\geq 1 and if there exists a resolution f:Y→Xf:Y\to X such that

r​KY=f∗​(r​KX)+∑iai​Ei,rK_{Y}=f^{*}(rK_{X})+\sum_{i}a_{i}E_{i},

where EiE_{i} ranges over all exceptional prime divisors of ff, and ai≥0a_{i}\geq 0.

00EY

Definition 2.2 (Wilson [W1]). A Calabi-Yau model YY is a normal projective variety with canonical singularities and such that KY∼ℚ0K_{Y}\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}0.

Let LL be a nef line bundle on XX, and let κ⁡(X,L)\kappa(X,L) be its Iitaka dimension, that is

κ(X,L)=m⇔h0(X,kL)∼km for all k large enough\kappa(X,L)=m\quad\iff\quad h^{0}(X,kL)\sim k^{m}\textrm{ for all }k\textrm{ large enough}

and κ⁡(X,L)=−∞\kappa(X,L)=-\infty if k​LkL has no sections for all k≥0k\geq 0. We call ν⁡(X,L)\nu(X,L) its numerical dimension, that is the largest nonnegative integer mm such that there exists an m−m-cycle VV such that (Lm⋅V)>0(L^{m}\cdot V)>0. It is always true that

κ⁡(X,L)≤ν⁡(X,L)≤n.\kappa(X,L)\leq\nu(X,L)\leq n.
00EZ

Definition 2.3. If κ⁡(X,L)=ν⁡(X,L)\kappa(X,L)=\nu(X,L) we say that LL is good (or abundant). If the complete linear system |k​L||kL| is base-point-free for some k≥1k\geq 1 we say LL is semiample.

When |k​L||kL| is base-point-free, we get a morphism Φ|k​L|:X→ℙ​H0​(X,k​L)∗\Phi_{|kL|}:X\to\mathbb{P}H^{0}(X,kL)^{*}. Notice that if LL is big, that is κ⁡(X,L)=n\kappa(X,L)=n, then it is automatically good. The following is an immediate consequence of the base-point-free Theorem (Theorem 6.1.11 in [KMM]).

00F0

Theorem 2.1 (Kawamata). Assume XX is a projective Calabi-Yau. If LL is good then it is semiample.

The next theorem is classical (see Theorem 2.1.33 in [L]).

00F1

Theorem 2.2 (Iitaka). Let LL be semiample. Then there exists a surjective morphism f:X→Yf:X\to Y where YY is a normal irreducible variety, f∗​𝒪X=𝒪Yf_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}=\mathcal{O}_{Y}, and L=f∗​AL=f^{*}A for some ample line bundle AA on YY. In fact f=Φ|k​L|f=\Phi_{|kL|} for all kk sufficiently divisible.

We’ll call ff the contraction map of LL. We also have the following theorem (Theorem 5.7 in [Ka1] or Theorem 1.9 in [Ka2]).

00F2

Theorem 2.3 (Kawamata). Assume XX is a projective Calabi-Yau. Then the subcone of 𝒦¯N​S\overline{\mathcal{K}}_{NS} given by nef and big classes is locally rational polyhedral.

If LL is a line bundle, its stable base locus is the intersection of the base loci of |m​L||mL| for all m≥1m\geq 1. It is equal to the base locus of |m​L||mL| for some mm (see Prop. 2.1.21 in [L]). If LL now is nef and big, we define the augmented base locus of LL, 𝐁+​(L)\mathbf{B}_{+}(L), to be the stable base locus of L−ε​HL-\varepsilon H for any HH ample divisor and any ε>0\varepsilon>0 small enough rational number. This definition is well-posed (see Lemma 10.3.1 in [L]) and a theorem of Nakamaye ([N], [L]) says that 𝐁+​(L)\mathbf{B}_{+}(L) is equal to the null locus of LL, that is the union of all positive-dimensional subvarieties V⊂XV\subset X such that (LdimV⋅V)=0(L^{\dim V}\cdot V)=0.

Finally let us state a well-known conjecture (see 10.3 of Peternell’s lectures in [MP]).

00F3

Conjecture 2.1. Assume XX is a projective Calabi-Yau. If LL is a nef line bundle, then LL is semiample.

If LL is effective, this conjecture follows from the log abundance conjecture. Indeed for any small rational ε>0\varepsilon>0, the pair (X,ε​L)(X,\varepsilon L) is klt, and the log abundance conjecture would imply that KX+εL∼ℚεLK_{X}+\varepsilon L\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}\varepsilon L is semiample.

Notice that when XX is a surface, Conjecture 2.1 holds: in fact if LL is nef and non trivial, then H2​(X,L)=H0​(X,KX−L)=0H^{2}(X,L)=H^{0}(X,K_{X}-L)=0 and by Riemann-Roch

dimH0​(X,L)≥2+12​L⋅L≥2,\dim H^{0}(X,L)\geq 2+\frac{1}{2}L\cdot L\geq 2,

thus LL is effective. Then we can apply the log abundance theorem for surfaces (see e.g. [FM]) and get the result.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.