ScalingStacks

Verified tagged author-source HTML · 0710.4579v1 · cited publication edition alignment unverified.

5. Examples

In this section we will give some examples where Theorem 1.1 applies. The constructions are well-known and come from algebraic geometry.

Let’s look at the case n=2n=2 first, the case n=1n=1 being trivial. The only projective Calabi-Yau surfaces are tori, bi-elliptic, Enriques and K​3K3 surfaces (recall that the Calabi Conjecture has been successfully applied to the study of K​3K3 surfaces by Todorov [To] and Siu [Si]). If XX is a torus and LL is a nef and big line bundle on XX, then LL is ample, and so Theorem 1.1 is vacuous in this case. Similarly if XX is bi-elliptic, then XX is a finite unramified quotient of a torus, so a nef and big line bundle on XX pulls back to a nef and big line bundle on a torus. But this must be ample, and so the original line bundle is ample too (Corollary 1.2.28 in [L]) and Theorem 1.1 is again empty. If XX is an Enriques surface, then XX is an unramified 2:12:1 quotient of a K​3K3 surface, so the study of Ricci-flat metrics on XX is reduced to the case of a K​3K3 surface. Finally let’s see that there exist projective K​3K3s that admit a nef and big line bundle that is not ample, to which Theorem 1.1 applies. For example let YY be the quotient surface T/iT/i where TT is the standard torus ℂ2/ℤ4\mathbb{C}^{2}/\mathbb{Z}^{4} and ii is induced by the involution i⁡(z,w)=(−z,−w)i(z,w)=(-z,-w) of ℂ2\mathbb{C}^{2}. The surface YY has 16 singular points, that are rational double points, and is a Calabi-Yau model. Blowing up these 16 points gives a smooth projective K​3K3 surface XX (called a Kummer surface), and we can take LL to be the pullback of any ample divisor on YY. The set EE, being equal to the null locus of LL, is readily seen to be the union of the 1616 exceptional divisors, that are (−2)(-2)-curves. Then Theorem 1.1 applies, and the limit of smooth Ricci-flat metrics on XX with classes approaching c1​(L)c_{1}(L) is the pullback of the unique Ricci-flat (actually flat) orbifold Kähler metric on YY in the given class. This originally appeared as Theorem 8 in [KT]. Now we show that conversely all examples of Theorem 1.1 on K​3K3 surfaces with α=c1​(L)\alpha=c_{1}(L) are of the form f:X→Yf:X\to Y where YY is an orbifold K​3K3 surface, k​L=f∗​AkL=f^{*}A, for some k≥1k\geq 1 and some AA ample divisor on YY. Let XX be a projective K​3K3 surface and LL a nef and big line bundle on XX. By Theorem 2.1 we know that some power k​LkL is globally generated, and we might as well assume that k=1k=1. Then the contraction map ff of LL contracts an irreducible curve CC to a point if and only if C⋅L=0C\cdot L=0. But since L⋅L>0L\cdot L>0, the Hodge Index theorem implies that C⋅C<0C\cdot C<0. The long exact sequence in cohomology associated to the sequence

0→𝒪X​(−C)→𝒪X→𝒪C→0,0\to\mathcal{O}_{X}(-C)\to\mathcal{O}_{X}\to\mathcal{O}_{C}\to 0,

gives that H1​(X,𝒪⁡(−C))=0H^{1}(X,\mathcal{O}(-C))=0. Serre duality on the other hand gives H2​(X,𝒪⁡(C))=H0​(X,𝒪⁡(−C))=0H^{2}(X,\mathcal{O}(C))=H^{0}(X,\mathcal{O}(-C))=0, and H1​(X,𝒪⁡(C))=H1​(X,𝒪⁡(−C))=0H^{1}(X,\mathcal{O}(C))=H^{1}(X,\mathcal{O}(-C))=0. Riemann-Roch then gives

dimH0​(X,𝒪⁡(C))=2+12​C⋅C,\dim H^{0}(X,\mathcal{O}(C))=2+\frac{1}{2}C\cdot C,

which implies that C⋅CC\cdot C must be even. But since π⁡(C)=C⋅C2+1\pi(C)=\frac{C\cdot C}{2}+1, the virtual genus of CC, is nonnegative, we see that C⋅C=−2C\cdot C=-2. This implies that π⁡(C)=0\pi(C)=0 and so CC is a smooth rational curve with self-intersection −2-2. Then the point f⁡(C)f(C) is a rational double point, and so Y=f⁡(X)Y=f(X) is an orbifold K​3K3 surface. Notice that Ricci-flat orbifold metrics on YY exist by [Y2], [Kob].

Now we turn to examples in dimension 33. The first one is known as conifold in the physics literature [GMS], and is described in detail in section 1.2 of [Ro], for example. Roughly speaking, it is a 33 dimensional Calabi-Yau model YY that sits in ℙ4\mathbb{P}^{4} as a nodal quintic. It has 1616 singular points, that are nodes and not of orbifold type. Moreover there exists a small resolution f:X→Yf:X\to Y, that is a birational morphism with XX a smooth Calabi-Yau threefold, that is an isomorphism outside the preimages of the nodes, which are 1616 rational curves. If LL is the pullback of any ample divisor on YY, then LL is nef and big on XX, and the limit of smooth Ricci-flat metrics on XX with classes approaching c1​(L)c_{1}(L) is the pullback of the unique singular Ricci-flat metric on YY, which exists by [EGZ]. The convergence is smooth on compact sets outside the union of the 1616 exceptional curves (which is clearly equal to the null locus of LL). There are also other 33 dimensional examples where the singularities of YY are not isolated: one of these is described in Example 4.6 in [W1], and YY has a curve CC of singularities. Blowing up CC gives a Calabi-Yau threefold XX; if LL is the pullback of any ample divisor on YY, then the null locus of LL is the exceptional divisor SS which is a smooth surface ruled over CC. Again our Theorem 1.1 applies, and the convergence is smooth off SS.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.