ScalingStacks

Verified tagged author-source HTML · 0710.4579v1 · cited publication edition alignment unverified.

00F9

Proof. Let’s assume first that that α=c1​(L)\alpha=c_{1}(L) for some line bundle LL, which is equivalent to requiring that α∈N1​(X)ℤ\alpha\in N^{1}(X)_{\mathbb{Z}}. Now LL is nef and big and so Theorem 2.1 implies that LL is semiample, so there exists some k≥1k\geq 1 such that k​LkL is globally generated. This gives a morphism f:X→ℙNf:X\to\mathbb{P}^{N} such that f∗​𝒪​(1)=k​Lf^{*}\mathcal{O}(1)=kL. If we let ωF​S\omega_{FS} be the Fubini-Study metric on ℙN\mathbb{P}^{N}, then ω=f∗​ωF​Sk\omega=\frac{f^{*}\omega_{FS}}{k} is a pointwise nonnegative smooth real (1,1)(1,1) form in the class α\alpha. If α∈N1​(X)ℚ\alpha\in N^{1}(X)_{\mathbb{Q}}, then k​α∈N1​(X)ℤk\alpha\in N^{1}(X)_{\mathbb{Z}} for some integer k≥1k\geq 1, and we can proceed as above. If finally α∈N1​(X)ℝ\alpha\in N^{1}(X)_{\mathbb{R}} then by Theorem 2.3 we know that the subcone of nef and big classes is locally rational polyhedral. Hence α\alpha lies on a face of this cone which is cut out by linear equations with rational coefficients. It follows that rational points on this face are dense, and it is then possible to write α\alpha as a linear combination of classes in N1​(X)ℚN^{1}(X)_{\mathbb{Q}} which are nef and big, with nonnegative coefficients. It is now clear that we can represent α\alpha by a smooth nonnegative form ω\omega.

Now fix a ball 𝒰\mathcal{U} in N1​(X)ℝN^{1}(X)_{\mathbb{R}} centered at α\alpha, such that 𝒦N​S∩𝒰\mathcal{K}_{NS}\cap\mathcal{U} is defined by {Φβ>0}1≤β≤k\{\Phi_{\beta}>0\}_{1\leq\beta\leq k} where the Φβ\Phi_{\beta} are linear forms with rational coefficients. Since the big cone is open, up to shrinking 𝒰\mathcal{U} we may also assume that all the classes in ∂𝒦N​S∩𝒰\partial\mathcal{K}_{NS}\cap\mathcal{U} are big. We may add some more linear forms to the Φβ\Phi_{\beta}, until they define a strongly convex rational polyhedral cone CC which is contained in 𝒦¯N​S∩𝒰\overline{\mathcal{K}}_{NS}\cap\mathcal{U}. We can then write

C={∑i=1ℓai​γi|ai≥0},C=\left\{\sum_{i=1}^{\ell}a_{i}\gamma_{i}\ \bigg|\ a_{i}\geq 0\right\},

where the γi\gamma_{i} are nef and big classes in 𝒰\mathcal{U}. We claim that, when tt is bigger than some t0<1t_{0}<1, it is possible to write the path αt\alpha_{t} as ∑iai​(t)​γi\sum_{i}a_{i}(t)\gamma_{i} where the functions ai​(t)a_{i}(t) are continuous and nonnegative. Assume first that the cone CC is simplicial, which means that the γi\gamma_{i} are linearly independent. Then the path αt\alpha_{t} enters and eventually stays in CC, and so it can be expressed uniquely as

(4.1) αt=∑i=1ℓai​(t)​γi,\alpha_{t}=\sum_{i=1}^{\ell}a_{i}(t)\gamma_{i},

where the ai​(t)a_{i}(t) are smooth and nonnegative, t0≤t≤1t_{0}\leq t\leq 1. If on the other hand CC is not simplicial, it can be written as a finite union of simplicial subcones that intersect only along faces, and that are spanned by some linearly independent subsets of the γi\gamma_{i}. On any time interval when αt\alpha_{t} belongs to the interior of a simplicial cone, the coefficients ai​(t)a_{i}(t) in (4.1) vary smoothly, and on a common face of two simplicial cones the coefficients agree, hence the ai​(t)a_{i}(t) vary continuously when t0≤t<1t_{0}\leq t<1. Moreover since we only have finitely many simplicial subcones, we see that as t→1t\to 1 the ai​(t)a_{i}(t) converge to the coefficients of α1\alpha_{1} in any of the simplicial cones that contains it, and so the ai​(t)a_{i}(t) are continuous on the whole interval t0≤t≤1t_{0}\leq t\leq 1.

By the first part of the proof we know that we can choose δi∈γi\delta_{i}\in\gamma_{i} a smooth nonnegative representative, for all ii. Choose a smooth function ε⁡(t):[t0,1]→ℝ\varepsilon(t):[t_{0},1]\to\mathbb{R} that is positive on [t0,1)[t_{0},1) and ε⁡(1)=0\varepsilon(1)=0, and that is small enough so that the classes α~t=αt−ε⁡(t)​αt0\tilde{\alpha}_{t}=\alpha_{t}-\varepsilon(t)\alpha_{t_{0}} are ample for all t0≤t<1t_{0}\leq t<1. Then the new path α~t\tilde{\alpha}_{t} is also converging to α\alpha as t→1t\to 1, and by the previous claim we can write

α~t=∑i=1ℓa~i​(t)​γi,\tilde{\alpha}_{t}=\sum_{i=1}^{\ell}\tilde{a}_{i}(t)\gamma_{i},

where a~i​(t)\tilde{a}_{i}(t) is a continuous nonnegative function, for all ii. Then the smooth (1,1)(1,1) forms

β~t:=∑i=1ℓa~i​(t)​δi\tilde{\beta}_{t}:=\sum_{i=1}^{\ell}\tilde{a}_{i}(t)\delta_{i}

are nonnegative representatives of α~t\tilde{\alpha}_{t} that vary continuously in tt. When tt approaches 11, the forms β~t\tilde{\beta}_{t} converge in the C∞C^{\infty} topology to a smooth nonnegative form ω~\tilde{\omega} representing α\alpha. If χ\chi is a Kähler form in αt0\alpha_{t_{0}}, then the forms βt=β~t+ε⁡(t)​χ\beta_{t}=\tilde{\beta}_{t}+\varepsilon(t)\chi defined on [t0,1)[t_{0},1) are Kähler, represent αt\alpha_{t} and converge to ω~\tilde{\omega} as t→1t\to 1. Up to replacing ω\omega by ω~\tilde{\omega}, this gives the desired family of forms on [t0,1)[t_{0},1). It is very easy to extend the family βt\beta_{t} on the whole [0,1)[0,1), and since we’re not going to use this, we leave the proof to the reader. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.