ScalingStacks

Verified tagged author-source HTML · 2007.01384v1 · cited publication edition alignment unverified.

The measure asymptote is now

(−d​dc​log⁡ht1/2)n∼p!​det(D2​ϕ)​(−d​dc​log⁡hℒ1/2+∑I∂u∂xi​d​dc​ϕi)n−p∧∏i=1p12​π​|log⁡|t||​d​log⁡|zi|∧d​arg⁡zi,\begin{split}(-dd^{c}\log h_{t}^{1/2})^{n}\sim&p!\det(D^{2}\phi)\left(-dd^{c}\log h_{\mathcal{L}}^{1/2}+\sum_{I}\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_{i}}dd^{c}\phi_{i}\right)^{n-p}\wedge\\ &\prod_{i=1}^{p}\frac{1}{2\pi|\log|t||}d\log|z_{i}|\wedge d\arg{z}_{i},\end{split} (14)

where D2​ϕ=(∂2ϕ∂xi​∂xj)p×pD^{2}\phi=(\frac{\partial^{2}\phi}{\partial x_{i}\partial x_{j}})_{p\times p} is the Hessian matrix of ϕ\phi. Thus the pushforward measure has the limit as t→0t\to 0:

limt→0Log𝒳∗((−ddcloght1/2)n EJ,tϵ)=p!det(D2ϕ)|dx1…dxp|×∫EJ,0ϵ(−d​dc​log⁡hℒ1/2+∑I∂u∂xi​d​dc​ϕi)n−p.\begin{split}\lim_{t\to 0}\text{Log}_{\mathcal{X}*}\left((-dd^{c}\log h_{t}^{1/2})^{n}\mathbin{\vrule height=6.88889pt,depth=0.0pt,width=0.55974pt\vrule height=0.55974pt,depth=0.0pt,width=5.59721pt}E_{J,t}^{\epsilon}\right)=p!\det(D^{2}\phi)|dx_{1}\ldots dx_{p}|\\ \times\int_{E_{J,0}^{\epsilon}}\left(-dd^{c}\log h_{\mathcal{L}}^{1/2}+\sum_{I}\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_{i}}dd^{c}\phi_{i}\right)^{n-p}.\end{split}

Taking ϵ→0\epsilon\to 0,

limϵ→0limt→0Log𝒳∗((−ddcloght1/2)n EJ,tϵ)=p!det(D2ϕ)|dx1…dxp|×∫EJ(−d​dc​log⁡hℒ1/2+∑I∂u∂xi​d​dc​ϕi)n−p.\begin{split}\lim_{\epsilon\to 0}\lim_{t\to 0}\text{Log}_{\mathcal{X}*}\left((-dd^{c}\log h_{t}^{1/2})^{n}\mathbin{\vrule height=6.88889pt,depth=0.0pt,width=0.55974pt\vrule height=0.55974pt,depth=0.0pt,width=5.59721pt}E_{J,t}^{\epsilon}\right)=p!\det(D^{2}\phi)|dx_{1}\ldots dx_{p}|\\ \times\int_{E_{J}}\left(-dd^{c}\log h_{\mathcal{L}}^{1/2}+\sum_{I}\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_{i}}dd^{c}\phi_{i}\right)^{n-p}.\end{split}

Here an interesting topological effect takes place. Even though d​dc​log⁡ridd^{c}\log r_{i} starts life as an exact form on XtX_{t}, it acquires a first Chern class in the process of smooth extension to the central fibre 𝒳0\mathcal{X}_{0}, because we are removing the distributional contribution d​dc​log⁡|zi|=[Ei]dd^{c}\log|z_{i}|=[E_{i}]. Thus on EJE_{J}, the smooth closed (1,1)-form

−d​dc​log⁡hℒ1/2+∑I∂u∂xi​d​dc​ϕi-dd^{c}\log h_{\mathcal{L}}^{1/2}+\sum_{I}\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_{i}}dd^{c}\phi_{i}

lies in the H1,1H^{1,1} class

c1​(ℒ)−∑I∂u∂xi​c1​(𝒪⁡(Ei)),c_{1}(\mathcal{L})-\sum_{I}\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_{i}}c_{1}(\mathcal{O}(E_{i})),

which is exactly the class 𝒟J​(x,‖⋅‖)\mathcal{D}_{J}(x,\left\lVert\cdot\right\rVert) we introduced earlier (cf. (12)). We have thus obtained a formula for the double limit:

p!​det(D2​ϕ)​|d​x1​…​d​xp|​(𝒟J​(x,‖⋅‖)n−p⋅EJ).p!\det(D^{2}\phi)|dx_{1}\ldots dx_{p}|(\mathcal{D}_{J}(x,\left\lVert\cdot\right\rVert)^{n-p}\cdot E_{J}).

Notice all auxiliary choices are eliminated at this stage. According to our heuristic logic that the NA MA measure should be the limit of the corresponding complex MA measures on XtX_{t}, we conclude the heuristic formula for the NA MA measure over Int​(ΔJ)\text{Int}(\Delta_{J})

r𝒳∗MA(‖⋅‖)=p!det(D2ϕ)|dx1…dxp|(𝒟J(x,‖⋅‖)n−p⋅EJ).r_{\mathcal{X}*}MA(\left\lVert\cdot\right\rVert)=p!\det(D^{2}\phi)|dx_{1}\ldots dx_{p}|(\mathcal{D}_{J}(x,\left\lVert\cdot\right\rVert)^{n-p}\cdot E_{J}). (15)

Notice the RHS is a differential operator in the potential ϕ\phi, because the intersection theoretic term 𝒟J​(x,‖⋅‖)\mathcal{D}_{J}(x,\left\lVert\cdot\right\rVert) is affine linear in the first order derivatives of ϕ\phi. The formula exhibits a curious mixture of intersection theory with real MA operator.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.