ScalingStacks

Verified tagged author-source HTML · 2007.01384v1 · cited publication edition alignment unverified.

00AM

Proof. By the calculations in the proof of Lemma 4.2,

(d​dc​ϕ0∘Log𝒳)n=n!​det(D2​ϕ0)​∏i14​π​−1​d​ζi∧d​ζ¯i,(dd^{c}\phi_{0}\circ\text{Log}_{\mathcal{X}})^{n}=n!\det(D^{2}\phi_{0})\prod_{i}\frac{1}{4\pi}\sqrt{-1}d\zeta_{i}\wedge d\bar{\zeta}_{i},

while the CY condition gives (cf. section 3.1)

(d​dc​ϕC​Y,J,t)n=ωC​Y,tn=(Ln)|log⁡|t||n​d​μt=(Ln)|log⁡|t||n​∫XtΩt∧Ω¯t​Ωt∧Ω¯t=(Ln)​|log⁡|t||n∫Xt−1n2​Ωt∧Ω¯t​|uJ|2​∏i−1​d​ζi∧d​ζ¯i,\begin{split}&(dd^{c}\phi_{CY,J,t})^{n}=\omega_{CY,t}^{n}=\frac{(L^{n})}{|\log|t||^{n}}d\mu_{t}=\frac{(L^{n})}{|\log|t||^{n}\int_{X_{t}}\Omega_{t}\wedge\overline{\Omega}_{t}}\Omega_{t}\wedge\overline{\Omega}_{t}\\ =&\frac{(L^{n})|\log|t||^{n}}{\int_{X_{t}}\sqrt{-1}^{n^{2}}\Omega_{t}\wedge\overline{\Omega}_{t}}|u_{J}|^{2}\prod_{i}\sqrt{-1}d\zeta_{i}\wedge d\bar{\zeta}_{i},\end{split}

where uJu_{J} is a holomorphic function of the defining functions z0,…​znz_{0},\ldots z_{n} of the divisors EiE_{i}, with limiting value uJ​(EJ)≠0u_{J}(E_{J})\neq 0. The two expressions are matched by the condition that Log𝒳∗dμt\text{Log}_{\mathcal{X}*}d\mu_{t} converge to d​μ0d\mu_{0} as t→0t\to 0, which boils down to

(d​dc​ϕC​Y,J,t)n=n!​det(D2​ϕ0)​|uJ|2|uJ​(EJ)|2​∏i14​π​−1​d​ζi∧d​ζ¯i.(dd^{c}\phi_{CY,J,t})^{n}=n!\det(D^{2}\phi_{0})\frac{|u_{J}|^{2}}{|u_{J}(E_{J})|^{2}}\prod_{i}\frac{1}{4\pi}\sqrt{-1}d\zeta_{i}\wedge d\bar{\zeta}_{i}.

Since uJu_{J} has a Taylor expansion in z0,…​znz_{0},\ldots z_{n}, we see that |uJ|2|uJ​(EJ)|2=1+f\frac{|u_{J}|^{2}}{|u_{J}(E_{J})|^{2}}=1+f for some smooth function ff in ζ1,…,ζn\zeta_{1},\ldots,\zeta_{n} with exponentially small CkC^{k}-norm bound

‖f‖Ck​(Log𝒳−1​(Wδ))≲kexp(−c(Wδ)|log|t||)\left\lVert f\right\rVert_{C^{k}(\text{Log}_{\mathcal{X}}^{-1}(W_{\delta}))}\lesssim_{k}\exp(-c(W_{\delta})|\log|t||)

for some exponent c⁡(Wδ)>0c(W_{\delta})>0 depending on WδW_{\delta}.

We focus on balls in the local universal cover of Log𝒳−1​(Wδ)\text{Log}_{\mathcal{X}}^{-1}(W_{\delta}) with definite size in the ζi\zeta_{i} coordinates. For sufficiently small tt, then the volume relative error ff has arbitrarily small CkC^{k}-norm bound, and Theorem 4.7 says the C0C^{0}-norm of ϕC​Y,J,t−ϕ0∘Log𝒳\phi_{CY,J,t}-\phi_{0}\circ\text{Log}_{\mathcal{X}} on the ball is also arbitrarily small. Thus we can apply Savin’s theorem 2.8, to deduce that ‖ϕC​Y,J,t−ϕ0∘Log𝒳‖Ck\left\lVert\phi_{CY,J,t}-\phi_{0}\circ\text{Log}_{\mathcal{X}}\right\rVert_{C^{k}} is arbitrarily small on shrinked balls. Since WδW_{\delta} for varying δ\delta give an exhaustion of the regular locus of ϕ0\phi_{0}, this shrinking can be compensated by starting with a larger WδW_{\delta}, and we deduce the CkC^{k}-convergence estimate as required. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.