00AB
Proposition 4.4. Given small numbers , then for sufficiently small depending on and , the function is near its minimum with large probability:
|
|
|
00AC
Proof. We wish to compare with from Lemma 4.2 by an -stability estimate.
Pick a parameter such that
|
|
|
Since the potential has a uniform bound, Theorem 2.1 implies another uniform Skoda estimate with modified constants
|
|
|
We also have the -stability property for in Lemma 4.2:
|
|
|
We then apply the uniform -stability estimate Theorem 2.6,
with , and . In this construction are sufficiently small, chosen successively depending on and . We conclude
|
|
|
Now , so
Taking the contrapositive, if we choose , then
|
|
|
whence for , using again ,
|
|
|
∎