Proof. [038H]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
Proof.
We always consider the -topology induced by the strictly -affinoid domains. We claim that the map is a homeomorphism and that it also identifies the -topologies. In fact, this follows easily from the following claim:
Step 1: Let be a strictly affinoid space over and . Then the natural projection is a homeomorphism which identifies the -topologies.
Let be the degree of the purely inseparable field extension. It is clear that for every , there is with
| (2.6) |
This property easily shows that is a homeomorphism which we read now as an identification. Using that (2.6) holds also for rational functions on and on , we see that and have the same strictly rational domains. By the Gerritzen–Grauert theorem [BGR84, Cor. 7.3.5/3], we deduce the Step 1.
Next we prove the bijective correspondence between the model metrics on and on . For this, it is enough to show that we have a bijective correspondence between model functions on and model functions on .
We recall from [GM16, Def. 2.8, 2.11] that a piecewise -linear function on a strictly -analytic space is a function such that there is a -covering of by strictly affinoid domains, analytic functions and non-zero with on for every .
By [GM16, Rem. 2.6, Prop. 2.10], model functions and piecewise -linear functions are the same and hence we have to check the bijective correspondence between piecewise -linear functions on and . This can be checked -locally and hence it is enough to prove the following:
Step 2: Using the same assumptions as in Step 1, the map is an isomorphism from the group of piecewise -linear functions on onto the group of piecewise -linear functions on .
Using the above definition of piecewise -linear functions, Step 1 and (2.6) yield easily Step 2.
To deduce the lemma, it remains to check that the identification between the model metrics on and preserves semipositivity. This is an easy consequence of the projection formula applied to finite morphisms between closed curves in the special fibers of models. ∎