ScalingStacks

Proof. [0319]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

Given KK, for all t>0t>0 small enough the sets λt−1​(K)\lambda_{t}^{-1}(K) are all contained in a fixed compact set K′⊂B×ℂn−mK^{\prime}\subset B\times\mathbb{C}^{n-m}. We wish to deduce (4.16) from (4.11). To see this, write on B×ℂn−mB\times\mathbb{C}^{n-m}

λt∗​p∗​T−σ∗​ω~t=−1​(∑i,jAi​j¯​(t,y,z)​d​zi∧d​z¯j+∑i,jBi​j¯​(t,y,z)​d​yi∧d​y¯jCLOSE+∑i,jCi​j¯(t,y,z)dyi∧dz¯j+∑i,jDi​j¯(t,y,z)dzi∧dy¯j).\begin{split}\lambda_{t}^{*}p^{*}T_{-\sigma}^{*}\tilde{\omega}_{t}=&\sqrt{-1}\bigg(\sum_{i,j}A_{i\overline{j}}(t,y,z)dz^{i}\wedge d\overline{z}^{j}+\sum_{i,j}B_{i\overline{j}}(t,y,z)dy^{i}\wedge d\overline{y}^{j}\\ &+\sum_{i,j}C_{i\overline{j}}(t,y,z)dy^{i}\wedge d\overline{z}^{j}+\sum_{i,j}D_{i\overline{j}}(t,y,z)dz^{i}\wedge d\overline{y}^{j}\bigg).\end{split}

Thanks to (4.11), on K′K^{\prime} the coefficents A,B,C,DA,B,C,D satisfy uniform CkC^{k} estimates in the variables (y,z)(y,z) independent of tt. We then pull back this equation via the map λ1/t\lambda_{1/t} (the inverse of λt\lambda_{t}) and get

p∗​T−σ∗​ω~t=−1​(t​∑i,jAi​j¯​(t,y,z​t)​d​zi∧d​z¯j+∑i,jBi​j¯​(t,y,z​t)​d​yi∧d​y¯jCLOSE+t∑i,jCi​j¯(t,y,zt)dyi∧dz¯j+t∑i,jDi​j¯(t,y,zt)dzi∧dy¯j),\begin{split}p^{*}T_{-\sigma}^{*}\tilde{\omega}_{t}&=\sqrt{-1}\bigg(t\sum_{i,j}A_{i\overline{j}}(t,y,z\sqrt{t})dz^{i}\wedge d\overline{z}^{j}+\sum_{i,j}B_{i\overline{j}}(t,y,z\sqrt{t})dy^{i}\wedge d\overline{y}^{j}\\ &+\sqrt{t}\sum_{i,j}C_{i\overline{j}}(t,y,z\sqrt{t})dy^{i}\wedge d\overline{z}^{j}+\sqrt{t}\sum_{i,j}D_{i\overline{j}}(t,y,z\sqrt{t})dz^{i}\wedge d\overline{y}^{j}\bigg),\end{split}

and the new coefficients are uniformly bounded in CkC^{k} on KK, thus proving (4.16). ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.