ScalingStacks

Proof. [0257]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

By (1), one has an≥0a_{n}\geq 0 for any integer n≥1n\geq 1. Moreover, an<+∞a_{n}<+\infty if and only if lnl^{n} lies in the image of the restriction map H0​(X,L⊗n)→H0​(Y,L|Y⊗n)H^{0}(X,L^{\otimes n})\rightarrow H^{0}(Y,L|_{Y}^{\otimes n}). To verify the inequality am+n≤am+ana_{m+n}\leq a_{m}+a_{n}, it suffices to consider the case where both ama_{m} and ana_{n} are finite. Let sms_{m} and sns_{n} be respectively sections in H0​(X,L⊗m)H^{0}(X,L^{\otimes m}) and H0​(X,L⊗n)H^{0}(X,L^{\otimes n}) such that sm|Y=l⊗m{\left.{s_{m}}\right|_{{Y}}}=l^{\otimes m} and sn|Y=l⊗n{\left.{s_{n}}\right|_{{Y}}}=l^{\otimes n}, then the section s=sm⊗sn∈H0​(X,L⊗(m+n))s=s_{m}\otimes s_{n}\in H^{0}(X,L^{\otimes(m+n)}) verifies the relation s|Y=l⊗(n+m){\left.{s}\right|_{{Y}}}=l^{\otimes(n+m)}. Moreover, one has

‖s‖h=supx∈Xan|s|h​(x)=supx∈Xan|sm|h​(x)⋅|sn|h​(x)⩽‖sm‖h⋅‖sn‖h.\|s\|_{h}=\sup_{x\in X^{\mathrm{an}}}|s|_{h}(x)=\sup_{x\in X^{\mathrm{an}}}|s_{m}|_{h}(x)\cdot|s_{n}|_{h}(x)\leqslant\|s_{m}\|_{h}\cdot\|s_{n}\|_{h}.

Since sms_{m} and sns_{n} are arbitrary, one has am+n≤am+ana_{m+n}\leq a_{m}+a_{n}. Finally, by Fekete’s lemma, if an<+∞a_{n}<+\infty for sufficiently positive integer nn, then the sequence (an/n)n≥1(a_{n}/n)_{n\geq 1} actually converges in ℝ+\mathbb{R}_{+}. The proposition is thus proved. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.