ScalingStacks

Proposition 1.1 . [0256]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proposition 1.1.

For any integer n⩾1n\geqslant 1, let

an=infs∈H0​(X,L⊗n)s|Y=l⊗n(log⁡‖s‖hn−n​log⁡‖l‖Y,h).a_{n}=\inf_{\begin{subarray}{c}s\in H^{0}(X,L^{\otimes n})\\ {\left.{s}\right|_{{Y}}}=l^{\otimes n}\end{subarray}}{\Big(}\log\|s\|_{h^{n}}-n\log\|l\|_{Y,h}{\Big)}.

Then the sequence (an)n≥1(a_{n})_{n\geq 1} is sub-additive, namely one has am+n≤am+ana_{m+n}\leq a_{m}+a_{n} for any (m,n)∈ℕ≥1(m,n)\in\mathbb{N}_{\geq 1}. In particular, if for sufficiently positive integer nn, the section lnl^{n} lies in the image of the restriction map H0​(X,L⊗n)→H0​(Y,L|Y⊗n)H^{0}(X,L^{\otimes n})\rightarrow H^{0}(Y,L|_{Y}^{\otimes n}), then “lim sup\limsup” in (3) is actually “lim\lim”.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.