ScalingStacks

Proof. [01BP]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

Set h⁡(t):=hφ,ψ​(t):=Eω​((1−t)​φ+t​ψ)h(t):=h_{\varphi,\psi}(t):=E_{\omega}((1-t)\varphi+t\psi) for 0≤t≤10\leq t\leq 1. Note that hh is a polynomial of degree at most nn when φ\varphi and ψ\psi are model functions. By continuity of the energy along decreasing nets, the same is true in general. In particular, hh is differentiable on [0,1][0,1].

Pick any decreasing sequence (ψj)j=1∞(\psi_{j})_{j=1}^{\infty} of ω\omega-psh model functions converging to ψ\psi. Note that hφ⟨s⟩,ψj→hφ,ψh_{\varphi^{\langle s\rangle},\psi_{j}}\to h_{\varphi,\psi} as polynomials when s→∞s\to\infty and j→∞j\to\infty, hence dd​t|t=0+​hφ⟨s⟩,ψj→h′​(0+)\frac{d}{dt}\big|_{t=0+}h_{\varphi^{\langle s\rangle},\psi_{j}}\to h^{\prime}(0+). Since (6.9) holds true for bounded functions by Proposition 6.3, it suffices to show

limj→∞lims→∞∫(ψj−φ⟨s⟩)​MA⁡(φ⟨s⟩)=∫(ψ−φ)​MA⁡(φ).\lim_{j\to\infty}\lim_{s\to\infty}\int(\psi_{j}-\varphi^{\langle s\rangle})\MA(\varphi^{\langle s\rangle})=\int(\psi-\varphi)\MA(\varphi).

First, we have

∫φ⟨s⟩​MA⁡(φ⟨s⟩)\displaystyle\int\varphi^{\langle s\rangle}\,\MA(\varphi^{\langle s\rangle}) =∫{φ≤−s}(−s)MA(φ⟨s⟩)+∫{φ>−s}φMA(φ⟨s⟩)\displaystyle=\int_{\{\varphi\leq-s\}}(-s)\,\MA(\varphi^{\langle s\rangle})+\int_{\{\varphi>-s\}}\varphi\MA(\varphi^{\langle s\rangle})
=∫{φ≤−s}(−s)MA(φ⟨s⟩)+∫{φ>−s}φMA(φ)\displaystyle=\int_{\{\varphi\leq-s\}}(-s)\,\MA(\varphi^{\langle s\rangle})+\int_{\{\varphi>-s\}}\varphi\MA(\varphi)

by (6.6). By Lemma 6.7 the first term of the right hand side tends to 00, and the second term converges to ∫φ​MA⁡(φ)\int\varphi\MA(\varphi) since MA⁡(φ)\MA(\varphi) puts no mass on {φ=−∞}\{\varphi=-\infty\}.

Second, for fixed jj we have lims→∞∫ψj​MA⁡(φ⟨s⟩)=∫ψj​MA⁡(φ)\lim_{s\to\infty}\int\psi_{j}\MA(\varphi^{\langle s\rangle})=\int\psi_{j}\MA(\varphi) since ψj\psi_{j} is continuous.

Finally, Lemma 2.23 yields limj→∞∫ψj​MA⁡(φ)=∫ψ​MA⁡(φ)\lim_{j\to\infty}\int\psi_{j}\MA(\varphi)=\int\psi\MA(\varphi), completing the proof. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.