ScalingStacks

Proof. [01BL]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

To prove (6.6), first assume ψ=−t\psi=-t, where t≥1t\geq 1. Pick s≥ts\geq t so that φ⟨t⟩=max⁡{φs,−t}\varphi^{\langle t\rangle}=\max\{\varphi_{s},-t\}, {φ>−t}={φs>−t}\{\varphi>-t\}=\{\varphi_{s}>-t\}, and

𝟏{φ>−t}MA(φ⟨t⟩)=𝟏{φs>−t}MA(φ⟨t⟩)=𝟏{φs>−t}MA(φs)=𝟏{φ>−t}⋅𝟏{φ>−s}MA(φs),\one_{\{\varphi>-t\}}\MA(\varphi^{\langle t\rangle})=\one_{\{\varphi_{s}>-t\}}\MA(\varphi^{\langle t\rangle})=\one_{\{\varphi_{s}>-t\}}\MA(\varphi_{s})=\one_{\{\varphi>-t\}}\cdot\one_{\{\varphi>-s\}}\MA(\varphi_{s}),

where the second equality follows from Theorem 5.1. As s→∞s\to\infty, 𝟏{φ>−s}MA(φs)(E)→MA(φ)(E)\one_{\{\varphi>-s\}}\MA(\varphi_{s})(E)\to\MA(\varphi)(E) for any Borel set EE, so the right hand side of the equation above converges to 𝟏{φ>−t}MA(φ)\one_{\{\varphi>-t\}}\MA(\varphi).

Now consider φ,ψ∈ℰ1​(X,ω)\varphi,\psi\in\mathcal{E}^{1}(X,\omega) and set u=max⁡{φ,ψ}∈ℰ1​(X,ω)u=\max\{\varphi,\psi\}\in\mathcal{E}^{1}(X,\omega). Then

  • •

    𝟏{φ⟨t⟩>ψ⟨t⟩}MA(u)=𝟏{φ⟨t⟩>ψ⟨t⟩}MA(u⟨t⟩)\one_{\{\varphi^{\langle t\rangle}>\psi^{\langle t\rangle}\}}\MA(u)=\one_{\{\varphi^{\langle t\rangle}>\psi^{\langle t\rangle}\}}\MA(u^{\langle t\rangle}) since {φ⟨t⟩>ψ⟨t⟩}⊆{u>−t}\{\varphi^{\langle t\rangle}>\psi^{\langle t\rangle}\}\subseteq\{u>-t\};

  • •

    𝟏{φ⟨t⟩>ψ⟨t⟩}MA(u⟨t⟩)=𝟏{φ⟨t⟩>ψ⟨t⟩}MA(φ⟨t⟩)\one_{\{\varphi^{\langle t\rangle}>\psi^{\langle t\rangle}\}}\MA(u^{\langle t\rangle})=\one_{\{\varphi^{\langle t\rangle}>\psi^{\langle t\rangle}\}}\MA(\varphi^{\langle t\rangle}) by (5.1) applied to φ⟨t⟩\varphi^{\langle t\rangle} and ψ\psi, noticing the inclusion {φ⟨t⟩>ψ⟨t⟩}⊆{φ⟨t⟩>ψ}\{\varphi^{\langle t\rangle}>\psi^{\langle t\rangle}\}\subseteq\{\varphi^{\langle t\rangle}>\psi\};

  • •

    𝟏{φ⟨t⟩>ψ⟨t⟩}MA(φ⟨t⟩)=𝟏{φ⟨t⟩>ψ⟨t⟩}MA(φ)\one_{\{\varphi^{\langle t\rangle}>\psi^{\langle t\rangle}\}}\MA(\varphi^{\langle t\rangle})=\one_{\{\varphi^{\langle t\rangle}>\psi^{\langle t\rangle}\}}\MA(\varphi) by the previous step and the inclusion {φ⟨t⟩>ψ⟨t⟩}⊆{φ⟨t⟩>−t}\{\varphi^{\langle t\rangle}>\psi^{\langle t\rangle}\}\subseteq\{\varphi^{\langle t\rangle}>-t\}.

To summarize, we get

(6.8) 𝟏{φ⟨t⟩>ψ⟨t⟩}MA(u)=𝟏{φ⟨t⟩>ψ⟨t⟩}MA(φ).\one_{\{\varphi^{\langle t\rangle}>\psi^{\langle t\rangle}\}}\MA(u)=\one_{\{\varphi^{\langle t\rangle}>\psi^{\langle t\rangle}\}}\MA(\varphi).

Now

𝟏{φ⟨t⟩>ψ⟨t⟩}MA(u)\displaystyle\one_{\{\varphi^{\langle t\rangle}>\psi^{\langle t\rangle}\}}\MA(u) =𝟏{φ>−t≥ψ}MA(u)+𝟏{φ>ψ>−t}MA(u)\displaystyle=\one_{\{\varphi>-t\geq\psi\}}\MA(u)+\one_{\{\varphi>\psi>-t\}}\MA(u)

As t→∞t\to\infty the first term tends to 00 since MA⁡(u)\MA(u) puts no mass on the pluripolar set {ψ=−∞}\{\psi=-\infty\} (see Remark 6.5), and the second term converges to 𝟏{φ>ψ>−∞}MA(u)=𝟏{φ>ψ}MA(u)\one_{\{\varphi>\psi>-\infty\}}\MA(u)=\one_{\{\varphi>\psi\}}\MA(u).

Thus the left-hand side of (6.8) tends to 𝟏{φ>ψ}MA(u)\one_{\{\varphi>\psi\}}\MA(u) as t→∞t\to\infty. Similarly, the right-hand side tends to 𝟏{φ>ψ}MA(φ)\one_{\{\varphi>\psi\}}\MA(\varphi). Finally the comparison principle follows exactly as in the proof of Corollary 5.3. The proof is complete. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.