ScalingStacks

3 Application to Calabi-Yau degeneration [008H]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

3 Application to Calabi-Yau degeneration

We work in the setting of polarised algebraic degeneration of Calabi-Yau manifolds, as in the Introduction.

3.1 Calabi-Yau measure

The Calabi-Yau measure (2) is studied thoroughly in [3], but it is illustrative to recall it explicitly on a semistable snc model 𝒳\mathcal{X}. The discussion is local on the base, and we will follow the notations of section 2, e.g. the components of the central fibre are denoted as EiE_{i} for i∈Ii\in I.

The canonical divisor K𝒳=∑iai​EiK_{\mathcal{X}}=\sum_{i}a_{i}E_{i} is supported on the central fibre, since KXK_{X} is trivialised. Multiplying Ω\Omega by a power of tt, which does not change d​μtd\mu_{t}, we may assume min⁡ai=0\min a_{i}=0. In the local coordinates around EJE_{J} away from the deeper strata,

Ω=fJ​∏0pziai​d​zi∧∏p+1nd​zj\Omega=f_{J}\prod_{0}^{p}z_{i}^{a_{i}}dz_{i}\wedge\prod_{p+1}^{n}dz_{j}

for some nowhere vanishing local holomorphic function fJf_{J}. Since t=z0​…​zpt=z_{0}\ldots z_{p},

Ωt=fJ​z0a0​…​zpap​∏1pd​log⁡zi∧∏p+1nd​zj,\Omega_{t}=f_{J}z_{0}^{a_{0}}\ldots z_{p}^{a_{p}}\prod_{1}^{p}d\log z_{i}\wedge\prod_{p+1}^{n}dz_{j},

hence

−1n2​Ωt∧Ω¯t=|fJ|2​|z0|2​a0​…​|zp|2​ap​∏1p−1​d​log⁡zi∧d​log⁡zi¯∧∏p+1n−1​d​zj∧d​z¯j.\sqrt{-1}^{n^{2}}\Omega_{t}\wedge\overline{\Omega}_{t}=|f_{J}|^{2}|z_{0}|^{2a_{0}}\ldots|z_{p}|^{2a_{p}}\prod_{1}^{p}\sqrt{-1}d\log z_{i}\wedge d\overline{\log z_{i}}\wedge\prod_{p+1}^{n}\sqrt{-1}dz_{j}\wedge d\overline{z}_{j}.

The total measure ∫Xt−1n2​Ωt∧Ω¯t\int_{X_{t}}\sqrt{-1}^{n^{2}}\Omega_{t}\wedge\overline{\Omega}_{t} is of the order O⁡(|log⁡|t||m)O(|\log|t||^{m}) where

m=max{|J|−1:EJ≠∅,ai=0 for i∈J}.m=\max\{|J|-1:E_{J}\neq\emptyset,a_{i}=0\text{ for }i\in J\}.

Thus d​μtd\mu_{t} satisfies a uniform upper bound of class (ai)(a_{i}) (cf. (4)).

3.2 Uniform Skoda estimate

We now prove the main theorem 1.3.

Proof.

First we observe that the choice of the Fubini-Study metric ωX\omega_{X} is immaterial. Given any two choices, the relative Kähler potential between them is bounded by O⁡(|log⁡|t||)O(|\log|t||) for 0<|t|≪10<|t|\ll 1, because the pole order of a section near t=0t=0 must be finite. Thus the relative Kähler potential between two choices of ωt\omega_{t} is bounded by O⁡(1)O(1) independent of tt, which affects the Skoda constant AA but not its uniform nature.

We now pass to a finite base change and find a semistable reduction. The Calabi-Yau measure d​μtd\mu_{t} on XtX_{t} is independent of the parametrisation of the base, and is preserved under finite base change. Thus it is enough to prove it assuming ωX\omega_{X} agrees with a smooth Kähler metric on a semistable snc model 𝒳\mathcal{X}; this is a special case of Theorem 2.9. ∎

3.3 Uniform L∞L^{\infty}-estimate

We recall the following result proved using Kolodziej’s pluripotential theoretic methods (cf. [16, section 2.2] for an exposition based on [8][9]):

Theorem 3.1.

Let (Y,ω)(Y,\omega) be a compact Kähler manifold, and the Kähler potential ϕ\phi solves the complex Monge-Ampère equation

(ω+−1​∂∂¯​ϕ)n∫Yωn=d​μ,supϕ=0.\frac{(\omega+\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}\phi)^{n}}{\int_{Y}\omega^{n}}=d\mu,\quad\sup\phi=0.

Assume there are positive constants α,A\alpha,A, such that the Skoda type estimate (1) holds for (Y,ω,d​μ)(Y,\omega,d\mu):

∫Ye−α​u​𝑑μ≤A,∀u∈P​S​H​(Y,ω)​ with ​supYu=0.\int_{Y}e^{-\alpha u}d\mu\leq A,\quad\forall u\in PSH(Y,\omega)\text{ with }\sup_{Y}u=0.

Then ‖ϕ‖C0≤C⁡(n,α,A)\left\lVert\phi\right\rVert_{C^{0}}\leq C(n,\alpha,A).

The uniform L∞L^{\infty}-estimate for the Calabi-Yau potentials in Theorem 1.4 is an immediate consequence.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.