2.1 Quantitative stratification and good test functions [008B]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
2.1 Quantitative stratification and good test functions
There is a quantitative stratification on any smooth fibre induced by the intersection pattern of : for such that , the corresponding statum is
|
|
|
namely a small ‘-tubular neighbourhood’ of minus the deeper strata. For we write . Here the disc and the small parameter can be shrinked for convenience; the essential thing is that all parameters should be independent of the coordinate .
It is useful to introduce local coordinates around , such that with are the local defining equations of for , and locally the fibration map is . Then up to uniform equivalence, locally
|
|
|
The rest of this section is devoted to the construction of good test functions.
Given any of these divisors , we can find a nonnegative function on , such that
- •
In the local charts near with being the defining function for ,
|
|
|
for some positive smooth function ;
- •
Away from the function is comparable to 1.
We observe
- •
The form extends smoothly;
- •
For inside , so that , by a local calculation near with ,
|
|
|
Here in the first line we need to fix so that the effect of is dominated by . The second line uses that for , the volume forms on
|
|
|
and the third line uses .
- •
On the function .
The region can be identified as , namely the vicinity of away from deeper strata. Here
|
|
|
Lemma 2.1.
(Good test function) Given the divisor , we can choose a test function on such that the following hold uniformly for small :
- •
is zero for .
- •
Globally .
- •
For any divisor intersecting , there is a subset of with measure at least on which .
- •
For , the form .
- •
For , the form .
Proof.
We seek the test function in the form for some convex, non-increasing, non-negative -function . Compute
|
|
|
so using the properties of above,
|
|
|
To satisfy our conditions on , it is enough to have
- •
for .
- •
for .
- •
for where
. Morever, for , we need so that
has some strict positivity for . Notice convexity of is a consequence of these conditions.
To construct such , we can prescribe the behaviour near by
for ,
and match this with a solution to
|
|
|
for some large enough , such that remains at the matching point. Integration shows that remains uniformly bounded at , or equivalently .
∎