ScalingStacks

2.2 Convexity [008C]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

2.2 Convexity

Consider u∈P​S​H​(Xt,ωt)u\in PSH(X_{t},\omega_{t}) normalised to supXtu=0\sup_{X_{t}}u=0. Equivalently, we can cover XtX_{t} by a bounded number of charts as before, and use the local potentials of ω𝒳\omega_{\mathcal{X}} to represent uu as a collection of local plurisubharmonic (psh) functions {uβ}\{u_{\beta}\} with |uβ−u|≤C|u_{\beta}-u|\leq C.

Lemma 2.2.

(Convexity) Let ϕ\phi be any psh function on the open subset of {1<|zi|<Λ,i=1,…p,|zk|<1,k=p+1,…n}⊂(ℂ∗)p×ℂn−p\{1<|z_{i}|<\Lambda,i=1,\ldots p,|z_{k}|<1,k=p+1,\ldots n\}\subset(\mathbb{C}^{*})^{p}\times\mathbb{C}^{n-p}. Then the function

ϕ¯​(x1,…​xn)=1(2​π)n​∫D​(1)n−p∏p+1n−1​d​zk∧d​z¯k​∫Tpϕ⁡(ex1+i​θ1,…​exp+i​θp)​d​θ1​…​d​θp\bar{\phi}(x_{1},\ldots x_{n})=\frac{1}{(2\pi)^{n}}\int_{D(1)^{n-p}}\prod_{p+1}^{n}\sqrt{-1}dz_{k}\wedge d\bar{z}_{k}\int_{T^{p}}\phi(e^{x_{1}+i\theta_{1}},\ldots e^{x_{p}+i\theta_{p}})d\theta_{1}\ldots d\theta_{p}

is convex.

Proof.

For any choice of θi\theta_{i} the function ϕ⁡(z1​ei​θ1,…​zp​ei​θn,zp+1,…,zn)\phi(z_{1}e^{i\theta_{1}},\ldots z_{p}e^{i\theta_{n}},z_{p+1},\ldots,z_{n}) is psh, since the TpT^{p}-action on (ℂ∗)p(\mathbb{C}^{*})^{p} is holomorphic. Thus the average function ϕ¯\bar{\phi} is also psh as a function of z1,…​zpz_{1},\ldots z_{p}. Any TpT^{p}-invariant psh function must be convex in the log coordinates, because for xi=log⁡|zi|x_{i}=\log|z_{i}|,

−1​∂∂¯​ϕ¯=14​∑∂2ϕ¯∂xi​∂xj​−1​d​log⁡zi∧d​log⁡zj¯≥0.\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}\bar{\phi}=\frac{1}{4}\sum\frac{\partial^{2}\bar{\phi}}{\partial x_{i}\partial x_{j}}\sqrt{-1}d\log z_{i}\wedge d\overline{\log z_{j}}\geq 0.

∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.