Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Source coverage notes 1 original structured objects have an unresolved mathematical role; their permanent tags identify source occurrences only. Complete original source context Β· Original author HTML
Proof.
Let π β² \mathfrak{X}^{\prime} be a strongly nondegenerate strictly polystable formal scheme such that there is a surjective Γ©tale morphism Ο : π β² β π \varphi:\mathfrak{X}^{\prime}\rightarrow\mathfrak{X} . Let q β π ~ q\in\tilde{\mathfrak{X}} be the closed point corresponding to Ο \tau . By Proposition 2.4 we have red π β 1 β‘ ( q ) = p π β 1 β ( Ο ) \red_{\mathfrak{X}}^{-1}(q)=p_{\mathfrak{X}}^{-1}(\tau) . Choose q β² β π β² ~ q^{\prime}\in\tilde{\mathfrak{X}^{\prime}} with Ο β‘ ( q β² ) = q \varphi(q^{\prime})=q . By [Gub07 , Proposition 2.9] we have that Ο \varphi induces an isomorphism red π β² β 1 β‘ ( q β² ) β β ~ β p π β 1 β ( Ο ) \red_{\mathfrak{X}^{\prime}}^{-1}(q^{\prime})\tilde{\rightarrow}p_{\mathfrak{X}}^{-1}(\tau) . Hence the pullback of ( πͺ X an | p π β 1 β ( Ο ) , β₯ β
β₯ ) \left(\mathcal{O}_{X^{\textup{an}}}\Big|_{p_{\mathfrak{X}}^{-1}(\tau)},\|\cdot\|\right) is the trivial bundle on red π β² β 1 β‘ ( q β² ) \red_{\mathfrak{X}^{\prime}}^{-1}(q^{\prime}) endowed with the metric β₯ 1 β₯ β² = e β h β p π β Ο \|1\|^{\prime}=e^{-h\circ p_{\mathfrak{X}}\circ\varphi} . Since p π β Ο = Ο β p π β² p_{\mathfrak{X}}\circ\varphi=\varphi\circ p_{\mathfrak{X}^{\prime}} it follows that β₯ β
β₯ β² \|\cdot\|^{\prime} is the metric associated to the function h β Ο h\circ\varphi on Ο β² := p π β² β ( red π β² β 1 β‘ ( q β² ) ) \tau^{\prime}:=p_{\mathfrak{X}^{\prime}}(\red_{\mathfrak{X}^{\prime}}^{-1}(q^{\prime})) which is again rational piecewise affine linear by [Ber04 , Theorem 6.1.1] and we may assume it is convex by definition.
Let y β p π β 1 β ( Ο ) y\in p_{\mathfrak{X}}^{-1}(\tau) .
In a neighbourhood of p π β² β ( y β² ) p_{\mathfrak{X}^{\prime}}(y^{\prime}) where y β² β p π β² β 1 β ( Ο β² ) y^{\prime}\in p_{\mathfrak{X}^{\prime}}^{-1}(\tau^{\prime}) with Ο an β ( y β² ) = y \varphi^{\textup{an}}(y^{\prime})=y we can write h β Ο an = max i = 1 , β¦ , s β‘ h i β² h\circ\varphi^{\textup{an}}=\max_{i=1,...,s}h^{\prime}_{i} for suitable affine linear functions h i β² h^{\prime}_{i} on Ο β² \tau^{\prime} . Now as Ο an : p π β² β 1 β ( Ο β² ) β p π β 1 β ( Ο ) \varphi^{\textup{an}}:p_{\mathfrak{X}^{\prime}}^{-1}(\tau^{\prime})\rightarrow p_{\mathfrak{X}}^{-1}(\tau) is an isomorphism we have h = max i = 1 , β¦ , s β‘ h i h=\max_{i=1,...,s}h_{i} where h i h_{i} are the piecewise affine linear functions on Ο \tau satisfying h i β² = h i β Ο an h^{\prime}_{i}=h_{i}\circ\varphi^{\textup{an}} . Now the metrics associated to the h i β² h^{\prime}_{i} are piecewise β \mathbb{Q} -linear and semipositive in y β² y^{\prime} by the same argument as in the proof of Proposition 5.6 . Hence the piecewise β \mathbb{Q} -linear metrics associated to the h i h_{i} extend from a compact strictly K K -analytic neighbourhood of y y to global metrics by [GM19 , Proposition 2.7] which are semipositive in y y . Now as β₯ β
β₯ \|\cdot\| is locally around y y given as the minimum of these metrics, also β₯ β
β₯ \|\cdot\| is a piecewise β \mathbb{Q} -linear metric which is semipositive in y y by Proposition 3.11 .
β