ScalingStacks

Proof. [05BG]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context Β· Original author HTML

Proof.

Let 𝔛′\mathfrak{X}^{\prime} be a strongly nondegenerate strictly polystable formal scheme such that there is a surjective Γ©tale morphism Ο†:𝔛′→𝔛\varphi:\mathfrak{X}^{\prime}\rightarrow\mathfrak{X}. Let qβˆˆπ”›~q\in\tilde{\mathfrak{X}} be the closed point corresponding to Ο„\tau. By Proposition 2.4 we have redπ”›βˆ’1⁑(q)=pπ”›βˆ’1​(Ο„)\red_{\mathfrak{X}}^{-1}(q)=p_{\mathfrak{X}}^{-1}(\tau). Choose qβ€²βˆˆπ”›β€²~q^{\prime}\in\tilde{\mathfrak{X}^{\prime}} with φ⁑(qβ€²)=q\varphi(q^{\prime})=q. By [Gub07, Proposition 2.9] we have that Ο†\varphi induces an isomorphism redπ”›β€²βˆ’1⁑(qβ€²)​→~​pπ”›βˆ’1​(Ο„)\red_{\mathfrak{X}^{\prime}}^{-1}(q^{\prime})\tilde{\rightarrow}p_{\mathfrak{X}}^{-1}(\tau). Hence the pullback of (π’ͺXan|pπ”›βˆ’1​(Ο„),βˆ₯β‹…βˆ₯)\left(\mathcal{O}_{X^{\textup{an}}}\Big|_{p_{\mathfrak{X}}^{-1}(\tau)},\|\cdot\|\right) is the trivial bundle on redπ”›β€²βˆ’1⁑(qβ€²)\red_{\mathfrak{X}^{\prime}}^{-1}(q^{\prime}) endowed with the metric βˆ₯1βˆ₯β€²=eβˆ’h∘pπ”›βˆ˜Ο†\|1\|^{\prime}=e^{-h\circ p_{\mathfrak{X}}\circ\varphi}. Since pπ”›βˆ˜Ο†=Ο†βˆ˜p𝔛′p_{\mathfrak{X}}\circ\varphi=\varphi\circ p_{\mathfrak{X}^{\prime}} it follows that βˆ₯β‹…βˆ₯β€²\|\cdot\|^{\prime} is the metric associated to the function hβˆ˜Ο†h\circ\varphi on Ο„β€²:=p𝔛′​(redπ”›β€²βˆ’1⁑(qβ€²))\tau^{\prime}:=p_{\mathfrak{X}^{\prime}}(\red_{\mathfrak{X}^{\prime}}^{-1}(q^{\prime})) which is again rational piecewise affine linear by [Ber04, Theorem 6.1.1] and we may assume it is convex by definition. Let y∈pπ”›βˆ’1​(Ο„)y\in p_{\mathfrak{X}}^{-1}(\tau). In a neighbourhood of p𝔛′​(yβ€²)p_{\mathfrak{X}^{\prime}}(y^{\prime}) where yβ€²βˆˆpπ”›β€²βˆ’1​(Ο„β€²)y^{\prime}\in p_{\mathfrak{X}^{\prime}}^{-1}(\tau^{\prime}) with Ο†an​(yβ€²)=y\varphi^{\textup{an}}(y^{\prime})=y we can write hβˆ˜Ο†an=maxi=1,…,s⁑hiβ€²h\circ\varphi^{\textup{an}}=\max_{i=1,...,s}h^{\prime}_{i} for suitable affine linear functions hiβ€²h^{\prime}_{i} on Ο„β€²\tau^{\prime}. Now as Ο†an:pπ”›β€²βˆ’1​(Ο„β€²)β†’pπ”›βˆ’1​(Ο„)\varphi^{\textup{an}}:p_{\mathfrak{X}^{\prime}}^{-1}(\tau^{\prime})\rightarrow p_{\mathfrak{X}}^{-1}(\tau) is an isomorphism we have h=maxi=1,…,s⁑hih=\max_{i=1,...,s}h_{i} where hih_{i} are the piecewise affine linear functions on Ο„\tau satisfying hiβ€²=hiβˆ˜Ο†anh^{\prime}_{i}=h_{i}\circ\varphi^{\textup{an}}. Now the metrics associated to the hiβ€²h^{\prime}_{i} are piecewise β„š\mathbb{Q}-linear and semipositive in yβ€²y^{\prime} by the same argument as in the proof of Proposition 5.6. Hence the piecewise β„š\mathbb{Q}-linear metrics associated to the hih_{i} extend from a compact strictly KK-analytic neighbourhood of yy to global metrics by [GM19, Proposition 2.7] which are semipositive in yy. Now as βˆ₯β‹…βˆ₯\|\cdot\| is locally around yy given as the minimum of these metrics, also βˆ₯β‹…βˆ₯\|\cdot\| is a piecewise β„š\mathbb{Q}-linear metric which is semipositive in yy by Proposition 3.11. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.