Note that is a closed point of and hence proper over . Therefore also is proper over since it is a closed subset of and is proper by [Tem00, Corollary 4.4]. Let be the Cartier divisor on induced by as in Proposition 2.11 such that .
We show by induction that for all there is a strata cycle of dimension whose components are contained in such that . The case is clear by taking . Now let and be as claimed. Let be a stratum of , such that is associated to an -dimensional open face of , i.e. with by the stratum face correspondence (Proposition 2.8). Using , there is an affine linear function such that . Then defines a Cartier divisor on by Proposition 2.11 which is numerically equivalent to on by Lemma 2.13 and which is trivial on because .
Hence, as is a strata subset, is a strata cycle. Write where the sum ranges over a finite number of -dimensional strata of contained in . Then we can calculate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and is a strata cycle as claimed.
We use this for to see that for a strata cycle of dimension contained in . Its components are strata points of which are mapped by to the point corresponding to . Now let be a formal open subset with an Γ©tale morphism such that is the distinguished stratum of (cf. Proposition 2.5) and define . Note that there is no factor because is of maximal dimension. As the strata occurring in the intersection process correspond to open faces of with vertex , their intersection with is nonempty. Hence we may calculate the multiplicities of locally on . The stratification of is obtained by the preimages of the strata of (see proof of Proposition 2.8) with respect to the base change of (cf. Construction 2.6). Let be the irreducible component in corresponding to and the Cartier divisor on whose pullback gives the Cartier divisor associated to on (cf. proof of Proposition 2.11). By applying the modifications of in the induction step also to we obtain a strata cycle of whose pullback is (as the intersection product is compatible with flat pullback by [Ful98, Proposition 2.3(d)]) and which has the same degree as using Lemma 2.13.
Now let
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and . As we have an isomorphism
|
|
|
and using [Gub13, Corollary 6.15], we find that is a toric variety with fan given by the cones generated by for with vertex (in fact we identify with by forgetting about the coordinate with index for each ). is given up to multiplication by a constant by the divisor on associated to the linear function . By [Ful93, 3.4,5.3] we have
|
|
|
where
|
|
|
and denotes the standard Lebesgue measure. For the last term we get
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hence
|
|
|
With denoting the morphism we conclude
|
|
|
Using [Ful98, Proposition 1.7] this equals
|
|
|
As is reduced since is smooth, this amounts to
|
|
|
This yields the equality we wanted to prove.
β