ScalingStacks

Proof. [059P]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

As in Construction 2.6, we cover 𝔛′\mathfrak{X}^{\prime} by étale maps ψ:𝔘→𝔛⁡(𝒏,𝒂,m)=𝔛⁡(𝒏,𝒂)×𝔛⁡(m)\psi:\mathfrak{U}\rightarrow\mathfrak{X}(\boldsymbol{n},\boldsymbol{a},m)=\mathfrak{X}(\boldsymbol{n},\boldsymbol{a})\times\mathfrak{X}(m) and for each 𝔘\mathfrak{U} and Δ∈𝔇\Delta\in\mathfrak{D} with Δ⊆𝔘an\Delta\subseteq\mathfrak{U}^{\textup{an}} we obtain the affine formal scheme 𝔘Δ\mathfrak{U}_{\Delta}. We write ψ′:𝔘Δ′′→𝔘Δ\psi^{\prime}:\mathfrak{U}^{\prime\prime}_{\Delta}\rightarrow\mathfrak{U}_{\Delta} for the base change with respect to ψ\psi and obtain a cover of 𝔛′′\mathfrak{X}^{\prime\prime}. On Δ∈𝔇\Delta\in\mathfrak{D}, hh is given by 𝒎​𝒙+v⁡(α)\boldsymbol{m}\boldsymbol{x}+v(\alpha) with 𝒎∈ℤ𝒏+𝟏\boldsymbol{m}\in\mathbb{Z}^{\boldsymbol{n}+\boldsymbol{1}}, α∈K×\alpha\in K^{\times}. We define DD locally on 𝔘Δ′′′\mathfrak{U}^{\prime\prime}_{\Delta^{\prime}} by ψ′⁣∗​(α⋅𝒙𝒎)\psi^{\prime\ast}(\alpha\cdot\boldsymbol{x}^{\boldsymbol{m}}). Then DD is indeed a Cartier Divisor on 𝔛′′\mathfrak{X}^{\prime\prime} as for 𝔘1,𝔘2,Δ1,Δ2\mathfrak{U}_{1},\mathfrak{U}_{2},\Delta_{1},\Delta_{2} as above and 𝔘:=𝔘1∩𝔘2\mathfrak{U}:=\mathfrak{U}_{1}\cap\mathfrak{U}_{2} we have α1⋅𝒙𝒎1/α2⋅𝒙𝒎2∈𝒪​(𝔘Δ1∩Δ2)×\alpha_{1}\cdot\boldsymbol{x}^{\boldsymbol{m}_{1}}/\alpha_{2}\cdot\boldsymbol{x}^{\boldsymbol{m}_{2}}\in\mathcal{O}(\mathfrak{U}_{\Delta_{1}\cap\Delta_{2}})^{\times} since 𝒎1​𝒙+v⁡(α1)=𝒎2​𝒙+v⁡(α2)\boldsymbol{m}_{1}\boldsymbol{x}+v(\alpha_{1})=\boldsymbol{m}_{2}\boldsymbol{x}+v(\alpha_{2}) on Δ1∩Δ2\Delta_{1}\cap\Delta_{2}. Hence

ψ1′⁣∗​(α1⋅𝒙𝒎1)/ψ2′⁣∗​(α2⋅𝒙𝒎2)|𝔘Δ1∩Δ2′′=ψ′⁣∗​(α1⋅𝒙𝒎1/α2⋅𝒙𝒎2)∈𝒪​(𝔘Δ1∩Δ2′′)×\displaystyle\psi_{1}^{\prime\ast}(\alpha_{1}\cdot\boldsymbol{x}^{\boldsymbol{m}_{1}})/\psi_{2}^{\prime\ast}(\alpha_{2}\cdot\boldsymbol{x}^{\boldsymbol{m}_{2}})\Big|_{\mathfrak{U}^{\prime\prime}_{\Delta_{1}\cap\Delta_{2}}}=\psi^{\prime\ast}(\alpha_{1}\cdot\boldsymbol{x}^{\boldsymbol{m}_{1}}/\alpha_{2}\cdot\boldsymbol{x}^{\boldsymbol{m}_{2}})\in\mathcal{O}(\mathfrak{U}^{\prime\prime}_{\Delta_{1}\cap\Delta_{2}})^{\times}

and therefore ψ1′⁣∗​(α1​𝒙𝒎1)/ψ2′⁣∗​(α2​𝒙𝒎2)∈𝒪​(𝔘1,Δ1′′∩𝔘2,Δ2′′)×\psi_{1}^{\prime\ast}(\alpha_{1}\boldsymbol{x}^{\boldsymbol{m}_{1}})/\psi_{2}^{\prime\ast}(\alpha_{2}\boldsymbol{x}^{\boldsymbol{m}_{2}})\in\mathcal{O}(\mathfrak{U}^{\prime\prime}_{1,\Delta_{1}}\cap\mathfrak{U}^{\prime\prime}_{2,\Delta_{2}})^{\times}. Furthermore DD is trivial on the generic fibre, as α⋅𝒙𝒎∈𝒪​(𝔛​(𝒏,𝒂)an)×\alpha\cdot\boldsymbol{x}^{\boldsymbol{m}}\in\mathcal{O}(\mathfrak{X}(\boldsymbol{n},\boldsymbol{a})^{\textup{an}})^{\times}. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.