1. Introduction [04TJ]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
1. Introduction
In this paper we investigate the Hausdorff dimension of the set where Alexandrov solutions (see Section for the precise definition) to
are not strictly convex. Recall that we say that a convex function is strictly convex at if there exists , a supporting tangent plane at , such that
Our main theorem is:
Theorem 1.1.
Assume is an Alexandrov solution to
in . Then is strictly convex away from a singular set with
We show this is optimal by constructing solutions to with singular set of Hausdorff dimension as close as we like to . This result is interesting especially for since it is well-known that in two dimensions solutions to are strictly convex.
Theorem 1.1 has several applications to the regularity theory for singular solutions to the Monge-Ampère equation with bounded right hand side, which we now describe.
Caffarelli developed a regularity theory of solutions to
at points where is strictly convex. We briefly summarize the main results. We define a section of at with height and slope by
for some subgradient at . If is strictly convex at then we can find a subgradient such that the supporting plane of this slope touches only at , and then take small enough that . In this setting, Caffarelli ([C1],[C2]) showed that
- (i)
is strictly convex in and ,
- (ii)
If then , and
- (iii)
For every there is some such that if then .
However, these regularity theorems fail at points where is not strictly convex. Consider the famous Pogorelov examples on which degenerate along . One constructs these examples by seeking solutions of the form and . The first is
which solves but is merely Lipschitz. The second is
which solves with strictly positive and smooth, but is only for and for .
In [C3], Caffarelli generalizes these examples to solutions that degenerate along subspaces of any dimension less than , and shows that it is not possible to find solutions degenerating on subspaces of dimension or higher. We provide a short proof in the next section (see Lemma 2.3). If agrees with a linear function on a -dimensional set, we say that is a -dimensional singularity. Our proof of Theorem 1.1 in fact shows that the collection of -dimensional singularities has Hausdorff dimensional measure zero (see Remark 3.4).
Since we cannot hope for regularity or regularity of singular solutions to for large , it is natural to ask what we can show about the integrability of the second derivatives. De Philippis, Figalli and Savin ([DFS],[DF]) recently showed regularity of strictly convex solutions to , where depends only on and . Our main theorem rules out the possibility that the second derivatives concentrate on :
Theorem 1.2.
Let be a solution to
in . Then .
We also show that Theorem 1.2 is optimal by proving that the examples giving optimality of Theorem 1.1 are not in for as small as we like.
A second consequence of Theorem 1.1 is that the points of strict convexity for form a connected set when is bounded away from . If is sufficiently regular we obtain unique continuation for the Monge-Ampère equation:
Theorem 1.3.
Assume that
in an open connected set , with strictly positive. If on an open subset of , then in .
To our knowledge, these are the first Sobolev regularity and unique continuation results for singular solutions to the Monge-Ampère equation.
The paper is organized as follows. In section we present basic geometric properties of the sections of solutions to . In particular, we present an important estimate on the volume growth of sections that are not compactly contained and relate the volume of compactly contained sections to the Monge-Ampère mass of these sections. In section we use these results at singular points together with the useful technique of replacing by to prove Theorem 1.1. In section we construct, for any , a solution to with a singular set of Hausdorff dimension , which shows that our main theorem is optimal. In section we use Theorem 1.1 to prove Theorem 1.2 and we show that the examples constructed in section are not in for as small as we like, which shows that regularity is optimal. Finally, in section we prove Theorem 1.3 by applying a classical unique continuation theorem in the set of strict convexity.
In future work we intend to present a more precise, quantitative version of our main theorem to obtain estimates for the second derivatives of singular solutions to .
Acknowledgements: This work is part of my forthcoming doctoral dissertation at Columbia University. I am very grateful to my thesis advisor Ovidiu Savin for his patient guidance and for his feedback on the drafts of this paper. I would also like to thank Nam Le and Yu Wang for helpful conversations about the subject.
The author was partially supported by the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program under grant number DGE 11-44155.