ScalingStacks

Remark 3.4 . [04U4]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Remark 3.4.

Replacing Σv\Sigma_{v} with

Σvk={|Sh,pv|<Cphn+k2},1≤k≤n−1\Sigma_{v}^{k}=\{|S_{h,p}^{v}|<C_{p}h^{\frac{n+k}{2}}\},\quad 1\leq k\leq n-1

and replacing 11 with kk in the preceding, one obtains that ℋn−k​(Σvk)=0\mathcal{H}^{n-k}(\Sigma_{v}^{k})=0. If detD2​u≥1\det D^{2}u\geq 1, such growth happens for v=u+12​|x|2v=u+\frac{1}{2}|x|^{2} at points where uu agrees with a linear function on a kk-dimensional subspace. This shows that the Hausdorff dimension of the kk-dimensional singularities is at most n−kn-k. In particular, we recover Lemma 2.3 since for k≥n2k\geq\frac{n}{2} we would have a kk-dimensional singularity with Hausdorff kk-dimensional measure 00.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.