ScalingStacks

Proof. [04SS]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

The map Log|ℝ​H∘:ℝH∘→𝒟⊂ℝn+1\operatorname{Log}|_{\mathbb{R}H^{\circ}}:\mathbb{R}H^{\circ}\to\mathcal{D}\subset\mathbb{R}^{n+1} is an immersion since the map Log|(ℝ∗)n+1:(ℝ∗)n+1→ℝn+1\operatorname{Log}|_{(\mathbb{R}^{*})^{n+1}}:(\mathbb{R}^{*})^{n+1}\to\mathbb{R}^{n+1} is an immersion (it is a trivial 2n+12^{n+1}-covering of ℝn+1\mathbb{R}^{n+1}).

To see the transversality we recall the definition of the foliation ℱ′\mathcal{F}^{\prime}. For each component of ℝn+1∖Σn\mathbb{R}^{n+1}\smallsetminus\Sigma_{n} the foliation ℱ′\mathcal{F}^{\prime} is parallel to a vector v→\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\to}}{{v}} normal to a facet of the Newton polyhedron of H∘H^{\circ}. Therefore, any hyperplane in the image γ⁡(ℝ​H∘)\gamma(\mathbb{R}H^{\circ}) is transverse to v→\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\to}}{{v}}. Furthermore, hyperplanes close to being parallel to v→\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\to}}{{v}} are close to the hyperplane in ℂ​ℙn+1{\mathbb{C}}{\mathbb{P}}^{n+1} corresponding to this facet and therefore are far from the given component of ℝn+1∖Σn\mathbb{R}^{n+1}\smallsetminus\Sigma_{n}. Thus the result ℱ\mathcal{F} of smoothing is also transverse to 𝒟\mathcal{D} and the angle between them in ℝn+1\mathbb{R}^{n+1} is separated from 0. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.