ScalingStacks

Proof. [034K]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

Let φ∈P​S​H​(X,ω)\varphi\in PSH(X,\omega). We can assume w.l.o.g. that φ≤0\varphi\leq 0 on XX. Let ψ={ψα:=φ+hα∈PSH(𝒰α)}\psi=\{\psi_{\alpha}:=\varphi+h_{\alpha}\in PSH({\mathcal{U}}_{\alpha})\} denote the associated (singular) positive metric of LL on XX, where {𝒰α}\{{\mathcal{U}}_{\alpha}\} denotes an open cover of XX trivializing LL (see section 4).

Step 1. We consider the following Bergman spaces

ℋj,j0:={s∈Γ(X,Lj)/∫X|s|2e−2​hj,j0dVω<+∞},{\mathcal{H}}_{j,j_{0}}:=\left\{s\in\Gamma(X,L^{j})\,/\,\int_{X}|s|^{2}e^{-2h_{j,j_{0}}}dV_{\omega}<+\infty\right\},

where hj,j0=(j−j0)​ψ+j0​hh_{j,j_{0}}=(j-j_{0})\psi+j_{0}h, j0j_{0} a fixed large integer (to be specified later). Let σ1(j,j0),…,σsj(j,j0)\sigma_{1}^{(j,j_{0})},\ldots,\sigma_{s_{j}}^{(j,j_{0})} be an orthonormal basis of ℋj,j0{\mathcal{H}}_{j,j_{0}} and set

ψj,j0:=12​j​log⁡[∑l=1sj|σl(j,j0)|2]=12​j​sups∈Bj,j0log⁡|s|2,\psi_{j,j_{0}}:=\frac{1}{2j}\log\left[\sum_{l=1}^{s_{j}}|\sigma_{l}^{(j,j_{0})}|^{2}\right]=\frac{1}{2j}\sup_{s\in B_{j,j_{0}}}\log|s|^{2},

where Bj,j0B_{j,j_{0}} denotes the unit ball of radius 1 centered at 0 in ℋj,j0{\mathcal{H}}_{j,j_{0}}. Clearly ψj,j0\psi_{j,j_{0}} defines a positive (singular) metric of LL on XX, equivalently φj,j0:=ψj,j0−h∈P​S​H​(X,ω)\varphi_{j,j_{0}}:=\psi_{j,j_{0}}-h\in PSH(X,\omega). If x∈𝒰αx\in{\mathcal{U}}_{\alpha} and s={sα}∈ℋj,j0s=\{s_{\alpha}\}\in{\mathcal{H}}_{j,j_{0}}, then |sα|2|s_{\alpha}|^{2} is subharmonic in 𝒰α{\mathcal{U}}_{\alpha} hence

|sα​(x)|2≤C1r2​n​∫B⁡(x,r)|sα​(x)|2≤C2r2​n​e2​supB⁡(x,r)hj,j0​∫X|s|2​e−2​hj,j0​d​Vω,|s_{\alpha}(x)|^{2}\leq\frac{C_{1}}{r^{2n}}\int_{B(x,r)}|s_{\alpha}(x)|^{2}\leq\frac{C_{2}}{r^{2n}}e^{2\sup_{B(x,r)}h_{j,j_{0}}}\int_{X}|s|^{2}e^{-2h_{j,j_{0}}}dV_{\omega},

where r>0r>0 is so small that B⁡(x,r)⊂𝒰αB(x,r)\subset{\mathcal{U}}_{\alpha}. We infer

(3) φj,j0​(x)≤(1−j0/j)​supB⁡(x,r)φ+C3−n​log⁡rj.\varphi_{j,j_{0}}(x)\leq(1-j_{0}/j)\sup_{B(x,r)}\varphi+\frac{C_{3}-n\log r}{j}.

There is also a reverse inequality which uses a deep extension result of Ohsawa-Takegoshi-Manivel (see [14]): there exists j0∈ℕj_{0}\in\mathbb{N} and C4>0C_{4}>0 large enough so that ∀x∈X,∀j∈ℕ\forall x\in X,\forall j\in\mathbb{N}, there exists s∈Γ⁡(X,Lj)s\in\Gamma(X,L^{j}) with

∫X|s|2​e−2​hj,j0​d​Vω≤C4​|s⁡(x)|2​e−2​hj,j0​(x).\int_{X}|s|^{2}e^{-2h_{j,j_{0}}}dV_{\omega}\leq C_{4}|s(x)|^{2}e^{-2h_{j,j_{0}}(x)}.

Choose ss so that the right hand side is equal to 11, hence s∈Bj,j0s\in B_{j,j_{0}}. Then

ψj,j0​(x)≥12​j​log⁡|s⁡(x)|2=(1−j0j)​ψ​(x)+jj0​h​(x)−log⁡C42​j.\psi_{j,j_{0}}(x)\geq\frac{1}{2j}\log|s(x)|^{2}=\left(1-\frac{j_{0}}{j}\right)\psi(x)+\frac{j}{j_{0}}h(x)-\frac{\log C_{4}}{2j}.

We infer

(4) φj,j0​(x)≥(1−j0j)​φ​(x)−log⁡C42​j≥φ⁡(x)−log⁡C42​j\varphi_{j,j_{0}}(x)\geq\left(1-\frac{j_{0}}{j}\right)\varphi(x)-\frac{\log C_{4}}{2j}\geq\varphi(x)-\frac{\log C_{4}}{2j}

since φ≤0\varphi\leq 0 on XX. It follows from (3) and (4) that φj→φ\varphi_{j}\rightarrow\varphi in L1​(X)L^{1}(X).

Step 2. We now show, following [16] that (φj,j0)j(\varphi_{j,j_{0}})_{j} is almost subadditive. Let s∈Γ⁡(X,Lj1+j2)s\in\Gamma(X,L^{j_{1}+j_{2}}) with

∫X|s|2​e−2​hj1+j2,j0​d​Vω≤1.\int_{X}|s|^{2}e^{-2h_{j_{1}+j_{2},j_{0}}}dV_{\omega}\leq 1.

We may view ss as the restriction to the diagonal Δ\Delta of X×XX\times X of a section S∈Γ⁡(X×X,L1j1⊗L2j2)S\in\Gamma(X\times X,L_{1}^{j_{1}}\otimes L_{2}^{j_{2}}), where Li=πi∗​LL_{i}=\pi_{i}^{*}L and π:X×X→X\pi:X\times X\rightarrow X denotes the projection onto the it​hi^{th} factor, i=1,2i=1,2. Consider the Bergman spaces

ℋj1,j2,j0:={S∈Γ(X×X,L1j1⊗L2j2)/\displaystyle{\mathcal{H}}_{j_{1},j_{2},j_{0}}:=\left\{S\in\Gamma(X\times X,L_{1}^{j_{1}}\otimes L_{2}^{j_{2}})\,/\,\right.
∫X×X|S|2e−2​hj1,j0/2​(x)−2​hj2,j0/2​(y)dVω1(x)dVω2(y)<+∞},\displaystyle\left.\int_{X\times X}|S|^{2}e^{-2h_{j_{1},j_{0}/2}(x)-2h_{j_{2},j_{0}/2}(y)}dV_{\omega_{1}}(x)dV_{\omega_{2}}(y)<+\infty\right\},

where ωi=π∗​ω\omega_{i}=\pi^{*}\omega. It follows from the Ohsawa-Takegoshi-Manivel L2L^{2}-extension theorem [15] that there exists S∈Γ⁡(X×X,L1j1⊗L2j2)S\in\Gamma(X\times X,L_{1}^{j_{1}}\otimes L_{2}^{j_{2}}) such that S|Δ=sS_{|\Delta}=s and

∫X×X|S|2​e−2​hj1,j0/2−2​hj2,j0/2​d​Vω1​d​Vω2≤C5​∫X|s|2​e−2​hj1+j2,j0​d​Vω≤C5,\int_{X\times X}|S|^{2}e^{-2h_{j_{1},j_{0}/2}-2h_{j_{2},j_{0}/2}}dV_{\omega_{1}}dV_{\omega_{2}}\leq C_{5}\int_{X}|s|^{2}e^{-2h_{j_{1}+j_{2},j_{0}}}dV_{\omega}\leq C_{5},

where C5C_{5} only depends on the dimension n=dimℂXn=\dim_{\mathbb{C}}X. Observe that {σl1(j1,j0/2)​(x)⋅σl1(j1,j0/2)​(y)}l1,l2\{\sigma_{l_{1}}^{(j_{1},j_{0}/2)}(x)\cdot\sigma_{l_{1}}^{(j_{1},j_{0}/2)}(y)\}_{l_{1},l_{2}} forms an orthonormal basis of ℋj1,j2,j0{\mathcal{H}}_{j_{1},j_{2},j_{0}}, thus

S⁡(x,y)=∑l1,l2cl1,l2​σl1(j1,j0/2)​(x)​σl2(j2,j0/2)​(y)S(x,y)=\sum_{l_{1},l_{2}}c_{l_{1},l_{2}}\sigma_{l_{1}}^{(j_{1},j_{0}/2)}(x)\sigma_{l_{2}}^{(j_{2},j_{0}/2)}(y)

with ∑|cl1,l2|2≤C5\sum|c_{l_{1},l_{2}}|^{2}\leq C_{5}. It follows therefore from Cauchy-Schwarz inequality that

|s⁡(x)|2=|S⁡(x,x)|2≤C5​∑l1|σl1(j1,j0/2)​(x)|2​∑l2|σl2(j2,j0/2)​(y)|2,|s(x)|^{2}=|S(x,x)|^{2}\leq C_{5}\sum_{l_{1}}|\sigma_{l_{1}}^{(j_{1},j_{0}/2)}(x)|^{2}\sum_{l_{2}}|\sigma_{l_{2}}^{(j_{2},j_{0}/2)}(y)|^{2},

which yields

φj1+j2,j0≤log⁡C52​(j1+j2)+j1j1+j2​φj1,j0/2+j2j1+j2​φj2,j0/2.\varphi_{j_{1}+j_{2},j_{0}}\leq\frac{\log C_{5}}{2(j_{1}+j_{2})}+\frac{j_{1}}{j_{1}+j_{2}}\varphi_{j_{1},j_{0}/2}+\frac{j_{2}}{j_{1}+j_{2}}\varphi_{j_{2},j_{0}/2}.

Note finally that φj,j0/2≤φj,j0\varphi_{j,j_{0}/2}\leq\varphi_{j,j_{0}} since φ=ψ−h≤0\varphi=\psi-h\leq 0, therefore φ^j:=φ2j,j0+2−j−2​log⁡C5\hat{\varphi}_{j}:=\varphi_{2^{j},j_{0}}+2^{-j-2}\log C_{5} is decreasing.

Step3. It remains to make φ^j\hat{\varphi}_{j} smooth. Indeed it has all the other required properties: it is decreasing and by Step 1 we have for all x∈Xx\in X,

(5) φ⁡(x)≤φ^j​(x)≤(1−j0​2−j)​supB⁡(x,r)φ+C6−n​log⁡r2j,\varphi(x)\leq\hat{\varphi}_{j}(x)\leq(1-j_{0}2^{-j})\sup_{B(x,r)}\varphi+\frac{C_{6}-n\log r}{2^{j}},

so that φ^j→φ\hat{\varphi}_{j}\rightarrow\varphi. Let σ1+s2j(2j),…,σNj(2j)∈Γ⁡(X,L2j)\sigma_{1+s_{2^{j}}}^{(2^{j})},\ldots,\sigma_{N_{j}}^{(2^{j})}\in\Gamma(X,L^{2^{j}}) be such that (σl(2j))l(\sigma_{l}^{(2^{j})})_{l} is a basis of Γ⁡(X,L2j)\Gamma(X,L^{2^{j}}) and set

φj:=12j+1​log⁡[∑l=1s2j|σl(2j)|2+εj​∑l=1+s2jNj|σl(2j)|2]+log⁡C52j+2−h.\varphi_{j}:=\frac{1}{2^{j+1}}\log\left[\sum_{l=1}^{s_{2^{j}}}|\sigma_{l}^{(2^{j})}|^{2}+\varepsilon_{j}\sum_{l=1+s_{2^{j}}}^{N_{j}}|\sigma_{l}^{(2^{j})}|^{2}\right]+\frac{\log C_{5}}{2^{j+2}}-h.

Clearly φj∈P​S​H​(X,ω)\varphi_{j}\in PSH(X,\omega). Moreover φj∈𝒞∞​(X)\varphi_{j}\in{\mathcal{C}}^{\infty}(X) because L2jL^{2^{j}} is very ample if jj is large enough (hence we can find, for every x∈Xx\in X, a holomorphic section of L2jL^{2^{j}} on XX which does not vanish at xx). Finally we can choose εj>0\varepsilon_{j}>0 that decrease so fast to zero that (φj)(\varphi_{j}) is still decreasing and converges to φ\varphi. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.