Proof.
That is a straightforward consequence
of the definition (since ). It then follows from Stokes theorem
that for every
, thus
.
Property 2) is a straightforward consequence of the definitions.
If then hence
. Fix . If
is such that then
with .
Moreover . This shows
.
In particular if are both Kähler then
for some constant , hence
with .
It remains to prove 4). It follows from the change of variables formula that
if with then
|
|
|
since with .
We infer .
When is a -isometry, i.e. with , then
the mapping is an isomorphism of
, whence
.
∎