ScalingStacks

Proof. [0286]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

We introduce the sets

Dj={z∈ℂn:u⁡(z)<mj},Kj={z∈ℂn:u⁡(z)≤mj}.D_{j}=\{z\in{\mathbb{C}}^{n}:\,u(z)<m_{j}\}\;,\;\;K_{j}=\{z\in{\mathbb{C}}^{n}:\,u(z)\leq m_{j}\}.

Since uu is a continuous psh exhaustion function, KjK_{j} is a compact set. Let

ρj=γj​max⁡{u−mj−1,0}−j,j≥0.\rho_{j}=\gamma_{j}\max\{u-m_{j-1},0\}-j,\;j\geq 0.

Then ρj\rho_{j} is psh on ℂn{\mathbb{C}}^{n} and (1) implies that

(2) ρj​(z)=ρj−1​(z)​if​u​(z)=mj,j≥1.\rho_{j}(z)=\rho_{j-1}(z)\;{\rm if}\;u(z)=m_{j},\;j\geq 1.

We claim that

(3) ρj​(z)≥u⁡(z)​if​z∈ℂn∖Dj,j≥0.\rho_{j}(z)\geq u(z)\;{\rm if}\;z\in{\mathbb{C}}^{n}\setminus D_{j},\;j\geq 0.

Indeed, since γj≥1\gamma_{j}\geq 1 and using (1) we obtain

ρj​(z)−u​(z)\displaystyle\rho_{j}(z)-u(z) =\displaystyle= (γj−1)​u​(z)−γj​mj−1−j≥(γj−1)​mj−γj​mj−1−j\displaystyle(\gamma_{j}-1)u(z)-\gamma_{j}m_{j-1}-j\geq(\gamma_{j}-1)m_{j}-\gamma_{j}m_{j-1}-j
=\displaystyle= (γj−1−1)​mj−γj−1​mj−2−j+1\displaystyle(\gamma_{j-1}-1)m_{j}-\gamma_{j-1}m_{j-2}-j+1
≥\displaystyle\geq (γj−1−1)​mj−1−γj−1​mj−2−(j−1).\displaystyle(\gamma_{j-1}-1)m_{j-1}-\gamma_{j-1}m_{j-2}-(j-1).

So xj:=(γj−1)​mj−γj​mj−1−j≥x0=0x_{j}:=(\gamma_{j}-1)m_{j}-\gamma_{j}m_{j-1}-j\geq x_{0}=0, and (3) is proved.

Let φj=max⁡{φ,−j}\varphi_{j}=\max\{\varphi,-j\}. We construct by induction on j≥1j\geq 1 a sequence of continuous psh functions ψj\psi_{j} on ℂn{\mathbb{C}}^{n} with the following properties:

(4) ψj​(z)>φj​(z)​for​z∈X,∫X∩Kj−1(ψj−φj)<2−j.\displaystyle\psi_{j}(z)>\varphi_{j}(z)\;{\rm for}\;z\in X\;,\;\;\int_{X\cap K_{j-1}}(\psi_{j}-\varphi_{j})<2^{-j}.
(5) ψj​(z)≥ρj​(z)​for​z∈Dj,ψj​(z)=ρj​(z)​for​z∈ℂn∖Dj.\displaystyle\psi_{j}(z)\geq\rho_{j}(z)\;{\rm for}\;z\in D_{j}\;,\;\;\psi_{j}(z)=\rho_{j}(z)\;{\rm for}\;z\in{\mathbb{C}}^{n}\setminus D_{j}.
(6) ψj​(z)<ψj−1​(z)​for​z∈Kj−1,where​ψ0=ρ0=max⁡{u,0}.\displaystyle\psi_{j}(z)<\psi_{j-1}(z)\;{\rm for}\;z\in K_{j-1},\;{\rm where}\;\psi_{0}=\rho_{0}=\max\{u,0\}.

Here the integral in (4) is with respect to the area measure on each irreducible component, i.e.

∫X∩Kf:=∑∫Y∩Kf​βdimY,\int_{X\cap K}f:=\sum\int_{Y\cap K}f\,\beta^{\dim Y},

where the sum is over all irreducible components YY of XX which intersect KK and β\beta is the standard Kähler form on ℂn{\mathbb{C}}^{n}. (Note that this is a finite sum.)

Assume that the function ψj−1\psi_{j-1} is constructed with the desired properties. We construct ψj\psi_{j} by applying Proposition 1.2 with χ=φj\chi=\varphi_{j} and v=ψj−1v=\psi_{j-1}. (If j=1j=1, ψ1\psi_{1} is constructed in the same way by applying Proposition 1.2 with χ=φ1\chi=\varphi_{1} and v=ψ0v=\psi_{0}.) By (4), φj≤φj−1<ψj−1\varphi_{j}\leq\varphi_{j-1}<\psi_{j-1} on XX (and for j=1j=1, clearly φ1<ψ0\varphi_{1}<\psi_{0} on XX). Therefore Proposition 1.2 yields a psh function φ~j\widetilde{\varphi}_{j} on ℂn{\mathbb{C}}^{n} so that φ~j|X=φj\widetilde{\varphi}_{j}\,|_{{}_{X}}=\varphi_{j} and φ~j<ψj−1\widetilde{\varphi}_{j}<\psi_{j-1} on KjK_{j}. Using the standard regularization of φ~j\widetilde{\varphi}_{j} and the dominated convergence theorem (as φj≥−j\varphi_{j}\geq-j) we obtain a continuous psh function ψ~j\widetilde{\psi}_{j} on ℂn{\mathbb{C}}^{n} which verifies

ψ~j​(z)>φj​(z)​for​z∈X,∫X∩Kj(ψ~j−φj)<2−j.\widetilde{\psi}_{j}(z)>\varphi_{j}(z)\;{\rm for}\;z\in X\;,\;\;\int_{X\cap K_{j}}(\widetilde{\psi}_{j}-\varphi_{j})<2^{-j}.

Moreover, since ψj−1\psi_{j-1} is continuous, we can ensure by the Hartogs lemma that we also have ψ~j​(z)<ψj−1​(z)\widetilde{\psi}_{j}(z)<\psi_{j-1}(z) for z∈Kjz\in K_{j}.

We now define

ψj​(z)={max⁡{ψ~j​(z),ρj​(z)},if​z∈Dj,ρj​(z),if​z∈ℂn∖Dj.\psi_{j}(z)=\left\{\begin{array}[]{ll}\max\{\widetilde{\psi}_{j}(z),\rho_{j}(z)\},\;{\rm if}\;z\in D_{j},\\ \rho_{j}(z),\;{\rm if}\;z\in{\mathbb{C}}^{n}\setminus D_{j}.\end{array}\right.

By (5) and (2) we have ψ~j<ψj−1=ρj−1=ρj\widetilde{\psi}_{j}<\psi_{j-1}=\rho_{j-1}=\rho_{j} on ∂Dj\partial D_{j} (for j=1j=1, recall that ψ0=ρ0\psi_{0}=\rho_{0} by definition). So ψj\psi_{j} is a continuous psh function on ℂn{\mathbb{C}}^{n} which verifies (5). On X∖DjX\setminus D_{j} we have by (3) that ψj=ρj≥u>φj\psi_{j}=\rho_{j}\geq u>\varphi_{j}, while on X∩DjX\cap D_{j}, ψj≥ψ~j>φj\psi_{j}\geq\widetilde{\psi}_{j}>\varphi_{j}. Since ρj=−j≤φj<ψ~j\rho_{j}=-j\leq\varphi_{j}<\widetilde{\psi}_{j} on X∩Kj−1X\cap K_{j-1}, we see that ψj=ψ~j\psi_{j}=\widetilde{\psi}_{j} on X∩Kj−1X\cap K_{j-1} so

∫X∩Kj−1(ψj−φj)≤∫X∩Kj(ψ~j−φj)<2−j.\int_{X\cap K_{j-1}}(\psi_{j}-\varphi_{j})\leq\int_{X\cap K_{j}}(\widetilde{\psi}_{j}-\varphi_{j})<2^{-j}.

Hence ψj\psi_{j} verifies (4). Finally, we have by (5), ρj=−j<ρj−1≤ψj−1\rho_{j}=-j<\rho_{j-1}\leq\psi_{j-1} on Kj−1K_{j-1} (and for j=1j=1, ρ1=−1<ψ0=0\rho_{1}=-1<\psi_{0}=0 on K0K_{0}). Since ψ~j<ψj−1\widetilde{\psi}_{j}<\psi_{j-1} on KjK_{j} we conclude that ψj<ψj−1\psi_{j}<\psi_{j-1} on Kj−1K_{j-1}, so (6) is verified.

So we have constructed a sequence of continuous psh functions ψj\psi_{j} on ℂn{\mathbb{C}}^{n} verifying properties (4)-(6). Since ⋃j≥1Dj=ℂn\bigcup_{j\geq 1}D_{j}={\mathbb{C}}^{n}, we have by (6) that the function

ψ⁡(z)=limj→∞ψj​(z)\psi(z)=\lim_{j\to\infty}\psi_{j}(z)

is well defined and psh on ℂn{\mathbb{C}}^{n}. As …<ψj+2<ψj+1<ψj\ldots<\psi_{j+2}<\psi_{j+1}<\psi_{j} on KjK_{j}, it follows that ψ<ψj\psi<\psi_{j} on KjK_{j}.

Suppose now that z∈Kj∖Dj−1z\in K_{j}\setminus D_{j-1}, for some j≥2j\geq 2, so mj−1≤u⁡(z)≤mjm_{j-1}\leq u(z)\leq m_{j}. By the above construction and property (5), we have

ψ~j​(z)<ψj−1​(z)=ρj−1​(z)⟹ψ⁡(z)<ψj​(z)≤max⁡{ρj−1​(z),ρj​(z)}≤γj​u​(z).\widetilde{\psi}_{j}(z)<\psi_{j-1}(z)=\rho_{j-1}(z)\Longrightarrow\psi(z)<\psi_{j}(z)\leq\max\{\rho_{j-1}(z),\rho_{j}(z)\}\leq\gamma_{j}u(z).

Similarly, for z∈K1z\in K_{1} we have

ψ⁡(z)<ψ1​(z)≤max⁡{ρ0​(z),ρ1​(z)}≤γ1​max​{u⁡(z),0}.\psi(z)<\psi_{1}(z)\leq\max\{\rho_{0}(z),\rho_{1}(z)\}\leq\gamma_{1}\max\{u(z),0\}.

Hence ψ\psi satisfies the desired global upper estimates on ℂn{\mathbb{C}}^{n}.

Property (4) implies that ψ⁡(z)≥φ⁡(z)\psi(z)\geq\varphi(z) for every z∈Xz\in X. Let KK be a compact in ℂn{\mathbb{C}}^{n} and YY be an irreducible component of XX so that φ|Y≢−∞\varphi\,|_{{}_{Y}}\not\equiv-\infty. By (4) we have that for all jj sufficiently large

0≤∫Y∩K(ψj−φ)=∫Y∩K(ψj−φj)+∫Y∩K(φj−φ)≤2−j+∫Y∩K(φj−φ).0\leq\int_{Y\cap K}(\psi_{j}-\varphi)=\int_{Y\cap K}(\psi_{j}-\varphi_{j})+\int_{Y\cap K}(\varphi_{j}-\varphi)\leq 2^{-j}+\int_{Y\cap K}(\varphi_{j}-\varphi).

Hence by dominated convergence, ∫Y∩K(ψ−φ)=0\int_{Y\cap K}(\psi-\varphi)=0, which shows that ψ=φ\psi=\varphi on YY.

Assume now that YY is an irreducible component of XX so that φ|Y≡−∞\varphi\,|_{{}_{Y}}\equiv-\infty. Then using (4) and the monotone convergence theorem we conclude that

∫Y∩Kψ=limj→∞∫Y∩Kψj=limj→∞(∫Y∩K(ψj−φj)+∫Y∩Kφj)=−∞,\int_{Y\cap K}\psi=\lim_{j\to\infty}\int_{Y\cap K}\psi_{j}=\lim_{j\to\infty}\left(\int_{Y\cap K}(\psi_{j}-\varphi_{j})+\int_{Y\cap K}\varphi_{j}\right)=-\infty,

so ψ|Y≡−∞\psi\,|_{{}_{Y}}\equiv-\infty. Therefore ψ=φ\psi=\varphi on XX, and the proof is finished. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.