Proof.
We introduce the sets
|
|
|
Since is a continuous psh exhaustion function, is a compact set. Let
|
|
|
Then is psh on and (1) implies that
| (2) |
|
|
|
We claim that
| (3) |
|
|
|
Indeed, since and using (1) we obtain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So , and (3) is proved.
Let . We construct by induction on a sequence of continuous psh functions on with the following properties:
| (4) |
|
|
|
| (5) |
|
|
|
| (6) |
|
|
|
Here the integral in (4) is with respect to the area measure on each irreducible component, i.e.
|
|
|
where the sum is over all irreducible components of which intersect and is the standard
Kähler form on . (Note that this is a finite sum.)
Assume that the function is constructed with the desired properties. We construct by applying Proposition 1.2 with and . (If , is constructed in the same way by applying Proposition 1.2 with and .) By (4),
on (and for , clearly on ). Therefore Proposition 1.2 yields a psh function on so that
and on . Using the standard regularization of and the dominated convergence theorem (as ) we obtain a continuous psh function on which verifies
|
|
|
Moreover, since is continuous, we can ensure by the Hartogs lemma that we also have
for .
We now define
|
|
|
By (5) and (2) we have on (for , recall that by definition). So is a continuous psh function on which verifies (5). On we have by (3) that , while on , . Since on , we see that on so
|
|
|
Hence verifies (4). Finally, we have by (5), on (and for , on ). Since on we conclude that on , so (6) is verified.
So we have constructed a sequence of continuous psh functions on verifying properties (4)-(6). Since , we have by (6) that the function
|
|
|
is well defined and psh on . As on , it follows that on .
Suppose now that , for some , so . By the above construction and property (5), we have
|
|
|
Similarly, for we have
|
|
|
Hence satisfies the desired global upper estimates on .
Property (4) implies that for every . Let be a compact in and be an irreducible component of so that . By (4) we have that for all sufficiently large
|
|
|
Hence by dominated convergence, , which shows that on .
Assume now that is an irreducible component of so that . Then using (4) and the monotone convergence theorem we conclude that
|
|
|
so . Therefore on , and the proof is finished. ∎