ScalingStacks

2.2. Proof of Theorem B [028C]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

2.2. Proof of Theorem B

We assume here that ω\omega is a Hodge form, i.e. that the cohomology class {ω}\{\omega\} belongs to H2​(V,ℤ)H^{2}(V,\mathbb{Z}) (more precisely to the image of H2​(V,ℤ)H^{2}(V,\mathbb{Z}) in H2​(V,ℝ)H^{2}(V,\mathbb{R}) under the mapping induced by the inclusion ℤ↪ℝ\mathbb{Z}\hookrightarrow\mathbb{R}). We prove the following more precise version of Theorem B.

Theorem 2.2.

Let XX be a subvariety of a projective manifold VV equipped with a Hodge form ω\omega. If φ∈PSH(X,ω|X)\varphi\in PSH(X,\omega\,|_{{}_{X}}) then given any constant a>0a>0 there exists ψ∈P​S​H​(V,ω)\psi\in PSH(V,\omega) so that ψ|X=φ\psi\,|_{{}_{X}}=\varphi and maxV⁡ψ<maxX⁡φ+a\max_{V}\psi<\max_{X}\varphi+a.

In the assumptions of Theorem 2.2 there exists a positive holomorphic line bundle LL on VV whose first Chern class c1​(L)c_{1}(L) is represented by ω\omega. By Kodaira’s embedding theorem LL is ample, hence for large kk there exists an embedding π:V↪ℙn\pi:V\hookrightarrow{\mathbb{P}}^{n} such that Lk=π∗​𝒪​(1)L^{k}=\pi^{*}{\mathcal{O}}(1).

Replacing ω\omega by k​ωk\omega, φ\varphi by k​φk\varphi, we can assume that L=𝒪⁡(1)L={\mathcal{O}}(1), VV is an algebraic submanifold of the complex projective space ℙn{\mathbb{P}}^{n}, and ω=ωF​S|V\omega=\omega_{FS}\,|_{{}_{V}} is the Fubini-Study Kähler form. Hence XX is an algebraic subvariety of ℙn{\mathbb{P}}^{n}, and Theorem 2.2 follows if we show that ωF​S\omega_{FS}-psh functions on XX extend to ωF​S\omega_{FS}-psh functions on ℙn{\mathbb{P}}^{n}.

Therefore we assume in the sequel that X⊂V=ℙnX\subset V={\mathbb{P}}^{n} and ω\omega is the Fubini-Study Kähler form on ℙn{\mathbb{P}}^{n}. Let [z0:…:zn][z_{0}:\ldots:z_{n}] denote the homogeneous coordinates. Without loss of generality, we may assume that they are chosen so that no coordinate hyperplane {zj=0}\{z_{j}=0\} contains any irreducible component of XX.

Let

θ(z)=logmax⁡{|z0|,…,|zn|}|z0|2+…+|zn|2,z=[z0:…:zn]∈ℙn.\theta(z)=\log\frac{\max\{|z_{0}|,\dots,|z_{n}|\}}{\sqrt{|z_{0}|^{2}+\ldots+|z_{n}|^{2}}}\,,\;z=[z_{0}:\ldots:z_{n}]\in{\mathbb{P}}^{n}.

This is an ω\omega-psh function and for all z∈ℙnz\in{\mathbb{P}}^{n},

−m≤θ⁡(z)≤0,where​m=log⁡n+1.-m\leq\theta(z)\leq 0\,,\;\;{\rm where}\;m=\log\sqrt{n+1}.

We start by noting that Theorem A yields special subextensions of ω\omega-psh functions on XX.

Lemma 2.3.

Let ε≥0\varepsilon\geq 0 and uu be a continuous (1+ε)​ω(1+\varepsilon)\omega-psh function on ℙn{\mathbb{P}}^{n} so that u⁡(z)≤0u(z)\leq 0 for all z∈ℙnz\in{\mathbb{P}}^{n}. If c>1c>1 and φ\varphi is an ω\omega-psh function on XX so that φ<u\varphi<u, then there exists a c​ωc\omega-psh function ψ\psi on ℙn{\mathbb{P}}^{n} so that

1c​ψ​(z)≤11+ε​u​(z),∀z∈ℙn,\frac{1}{c}\,\psi(z)\leq\frac{1}{1+\varepsilon}\,u(z),\;\forall z\in{\mathbb{P}}^{n},

and

ψ⁡(z)=φ⁡(z)+(c−1)​θ​(z)+(c−1)​minζ∈ℙn⁡u⁡(ζ),∀z∈X.\psi(z)=\varphi(z)+(c-1)\theta(z)+(c-1)\min_{\zeta\in{\mathbb{P}}^{n}}u(\zeta),\;\forall z\in X.
Proof.

Let

M=−minζ∈ℙn⁡u⁡(ζ)≥0.M=-\min_{\zeta\in{\mathbb{P}}^{n}}u(\zeta)\geq 0.

We work first in an affine chart {zj=1}≡ℂn\{z_{j}=1\}\equiv{\mathbb{C}}^{n}. Let Xj=X∩{zj=1}X_{j}=X\cap\{z_{j}=1\} and let ρj≥0\rho_{j}\geq 0 be the potential of ω\omega in this chart with ρj​(0)=0\rho_{j}(0)=0. Then φ+ρj\varphi+\rho_{j} is psh on XjX_{j} and since u≤0u\leq 0,

φ+ρj+M<u+ρj+M≤11+ε​u+ρj+M​on​Xj.\varphi+\rho_{j}+M<u+\rho_{j}+M\leq\frac{1}{1+\varepsilon}\,u+\rho_{j}+M\;{\rm on}\;X_{j}.

Note that (1+ε)−1​u+ρj+M≥0(1+\varepsilon)^{-1}u+\rho_{j}+M\geq 0 is a continuous psh exhaustion function on ℂn{\mathbb{C}}^{n}. Theorem A yields a psh function ψ~\widetilde{\psi} on ℂn{\mathbb{C}}^{n} so that

ψ~<c1+ε​u+c​ρj+c​M​on​ℂn,ψ~=φ+ρj+M​on​Xj.\widetilde{\psi}<\frac{c}{1+\varepsilon}\,u+c\rho_{j}+cM\;{\rm on}\;{\mathbb{C}}^{n}\;,\;\;\widetilde{\psi}=\varphi+\rho_{j}+M\;{\rm on}\;X_{j}.

The function ψj=ψ~−c​ρj−c​M\psi_{j}=\widetilde{\psi}-c\rho_{j}-cM extends uniquely to a c​ωc\omega-psh function on ℙn{\mathbb{P}}^{n} which verifies

ψj≤c1+ε​u​on​ℙn.\psi_{j}\leq\frac{c}{1+\varepsilon}\,u\;\;{\rm on}\;{\mathbb{P}}^{n}.

Moreover on X∩{zj=1}X\cap\{z_{j}=1\} we have

ψj=φ−(c−1)​ρj−(c−1)​M=φ+(c−1)​θj−(c−1)​M,\psi_{j}=\varphi-(c-1)\rho_{j}-(c-1)M=\varphi+(c-1)\theta_{j}-(c-1)M,

where

θj​(z)=log⁡|zj||z0|2+…+|zn|2.\theta_{j}(z)=\log\frac{|z_{j}|}{\sqrt{|z_{0}|^{2}+\ldots+|z_{n}|^{2}}}\;.

Hence ψj=−∞\psi_{j}=-\infty on X∩{zj=0}X\cap\{z_{j}=0\}.

We finally let ψ=max⁡{ψ0,…,ψn}\psi=\max\{\psi_{0},\ldots,\psi_{n}\}. This is a c​ωc\omega-psh function on ℙn{\mathbb{P}}^{n} which verifies the desired conclusions, since θ=max⁡{θ0,…,θn}\theta=\max\{\theta_{0},\ldots,\theta_{n}\}. ∎

Proof of Theorem 2.2. Fix a>0a>0. Replacing φ\varphi by φ−maxX⁡φ−a\varphi-\max_{X}\varphi-a we may assume that maxX⁡φ=−a\max_{X}\varphi=-a. We will show that there exists a sequence of smooth ω\omega-psh functions φj\varphi_{j} on ℙn{\mathbb{P}}^{n} which decrease pointwise on ℙn{\mathbb{P}}^{n} to a negative ω\omega-psh function ψ\psi so that ψ=φ\psi=\varphi on XX.

Let X′X^{\prime} be the union of the irreducible components WW of XX so that φ|W≢−∞\varphi\,|_{{}_{W}}\not\equiv-\infty. We first construct by induction on j≥1j\geq 1 a sequence of numbers εj↘0\varepsilon_{j}\searrow 0 and a sequence of negative smooth (1+εj)​ω(1+\varepsilon_{j})\omega-psh functions ψj\psi_{j} on ℙn{\mathbb{P}}^{n} so that for all j≥2j\geq 2

ψj1+εj​<ψj−11+εj−1​on​ℙn,ψj−1>​φ​on​X,∫X′(ψj−φ)<1j,∫Wψj<−j,\frac{\psi_{j}}{1+\varepsilon_{j}}<\frac{\psi_{j-1}}{1+\varepsilon_{j-1}}\;\;{\rm on}\;{\mathbb{P}}^{n}\;,\;\;\psi_{j-1}>\varphi\;{\rm on}\;X\;,\;\;\int_{X^{\prime}}(\psi_{j}-\varphi)<\frac{1}{j}\;,\;\;\int_{W}\psi_{j}<-j\,,

for every irreducible component WW of XX where φ|W≡−∞\varphi\,|_{{}_{W}}\equiv-\infty. Here the integrals are with respect to the area measure on each irreducible component XjX_{j} of XX, i.e.

∫Xf:=∑Xj∫Xjf​ωdimXj.\int_{X}f:=\sum_{X_{j}}\int_{X_{j}}f\,\omega^{\dim X_{j}}.

Let ε1=1\varepsilon_{1}=1, ψ1=0\psi_{1}=0, and assume that εj−1,ψj−1\varepsilon_{j-1},\,\psi_{j-1}, where j≥2j\geq 2, are constructed with the above properties. Since φ<ψj−1|X\varphi<\psi_{j-1}\,|_{{}_{X}} and the latter is continuous on the compact set XX, we can find δ>0\delta>0 so that φ<ψj−1−δ\varphi<\psi_{j-1}-\delta on XX.

Let c>1c>1. By Lemma 2.3, there exists a c​ωc\omega-psh function ψc\psi_{c} so that

ψcc≤ψj−1−δ1+εj−1​on​ℙn,ψc=φ+(c−1)​θ−(c−1)​Mj−1​on​X,\frac{\psi_{c}}{c}\leq\frac{\psi_{j-1}-\delta}{1+\varepsilon_{j-1}}\;\;{\rm on}\;{\mathbb{P}}^{n}\;,\;\;\psi_{c}=\varphi+(c-1)\theta-(c-1)M_{j-1}\;\;{\rm on}\;X,

where

Mj−1=δ−minζ∈ℙn⁡ψj−1​(ζ)≥0.M_{j-1}=\delta-\min_{\zeta\in{\mathbb{P}}^{n}}\psi_{j-1}(\zeta)\geq 0.

We can regularize ψc\psi_{c} on ℙn{\mathbb{P}}^{n}: there exists a sequence of smooth c​ωc\omega-psh functions decreasing to ψc\psi_{c} on ℙn{\mathbb{P}}^{n}. Therefore we can find a smooth c​ωc\omega-psh function ψc′\psi^{\prime}_{c} on ℙn{\mathbb{P}}^{n} so that

ψc′c​<ψj−1−δ21+εj−1​on​ℙn,ψc′>​φ+(c−1)​θ−(c−1)​Mj−1≥φ−(c−1)​(m+Mj−1)​on​X.\frac{\psi^{\prime}_{c}}{c}<\frac{\psi_{j-1}-\frac{\delta}{2}}{1+\varepsilon_{j-1}}\;{\rm on}\;{\mathbb{P}}^{n},\;\;\psi^{\prime}_{c}>\varphi+(c-1)\theta-(c-1)M_{j-1}\geq\varphi-(c-1)(m+M_{j-1})\;\;{\rm on}\;X.

By dominated, resp. monotone convergence, we can in addition ensure that

∫X′(ψc′−φ)≤∫X′(ψc′−φ−(c−1)​θ+(c−1)​Mj−1)<c−1,\int_{X^{\prime}}(\psi^{\prime}_{c}-\varphi)\leq\int_{X^{\prime}}(\psi^{\prime}_{c}-\varphi-(c-1)\theta+(c-1)M_{j-1})<c-1,
∫Wψc′<−j−(c−1)​(m+Mj−1)​|W|,\int_{W}\psi^{\prime}_{c}<-j-(c-1)(m+M_{j-1})|W|,

for every irreducible component WW of XX where φ|W≡−∞\varphi\,|_{{}_{W}}\equiv-\infty. Here |W||W| denotes the (projective) area of WW.

Now let ψc′′=ψc′+(c−1)​(m+Mj−1)\psi^{\prime\prime}_{c}=\psi^{\prime}_{c}+(c-1)(m+M_{j-1}). Then on ℙn{\mathbb{P}}^{n} we have

ψc′′c<ψj−1−δ21+εj−1+(c−1)​(m+Mj−1)c<ψj−11+εj−1−δ4+(c−1)​(m+Mj−1).\frac{\psi^{\prime\prime}_{c}}{c}<\frac{\psi_{j-1}-\frac{\delta}{2}}{1+\varepsilon_{j-1}}+\frac{(c-1)(m+M_{j-1})}{c}<\frac{\psi_{j-1}}{1+\varepsilon_{j-1}}-\frac{\delta}{4}+(c-1)(m+M_{j-1}).

Moreover, ψc′′>φ\psi^{\prime\prime}_{c}>\varphi on XX and

∫X′(ψc′′−φ)\displaystyle\int_{X^{\prime}}(\psi^{\prime\prime}_{c}-\varphi) =\displaystyle= ∫X′(ψc′−φ)+(c−1)​(m+Mj−1)​|X′|\displaystyle\int_{X^{\prime}}(\psi^{\prime}_{c}-\varphi)+(c-1)(m+M_{j-1})|X^{\prime}|
<\displaystyle< (c−1)​(1+m​|X′|+Mj−1​|X′|),\displaystyle(c-1)(1+m|X^{\prime}|+M_{j-1}|X^{\prime}|)\;,
∫Wψc′′\displaystyle\int_{W}\psi^{\prime\prime}_{c} =\displaystyle= ∫Wψc′+(c−1)​(m+Mj−1)​|W|<−j,\displaystyle\int_{W}\psi^{\prime}_{c}+(c-1)(m+M_{j-1})|W|<-j\;,

for every irreducible component WW of XX where φ|W≡−∞\varphi\,|_{{}_{W}}\equiv-\infty.

We take c=1+εjc=1+\varepsilon_{j} and ψj=ψc′′\psi_{j}=\psi^{\prime\prime}_{c}, where εj>0\varepsilon_{j}>0 is so that

εj<εj−1/2,εj​(m+Mj−1)<δ4,εj​(1+m​|X′|+Mj−1​|X′|)<1j.\varepsilon_{j}<\varepsilon_{j-1}/2\;,\;\;\varepsilon_{j}(m+M_{j-1})<\frac{\delta}{4}\;,\;\;\varepsilon_{j}(1+m|X^{\prime}|+M_{j-1}|X^{\prime}|)<\frac{1}{j}\;.

Then εj,ψj\varepsilon_{j},\,\psi_{j} have the desired properties.

We conclude that φj=(1+εj)−1​ψj\varphi_{j}=(1+\varepsilon_{j})^{-1}\psi_{j} is a decreasing sequence of smooth negative ω\omega-psh function on ℙn{\mathbb{P}}^{n}, so that φj>(1+εj)−1​φ>φ\varphi_{j}>(1+\varepsilon_{j})^{-1}\varphi>\varphi on XX. Hence ψ=limj→∞φj\psi=\lim_{j\to\infty}\varphi_{j} is a negative ω\omega-psh function on ℙn{\mathbb{P}}^{n} and ψ≥φ\psi\geq\varphi on XX. Note that

∫X′(φj−φ)=11+εj​∫X′(ψj−φ)−εj1+εj​∫X′φ<1j−εj1+εj​∫X′φ,\int_{X^{\prime}}(\varphi_{j}-\varphi)=\frac{1}{1+\varepsilon_{j}}\int_{X^{\prime}}(\psi_{j}-\varphi)-\frac{\varepsilon_{j}}{1+\varepsilon_{j}}\int_{X^{\prime}}\varphi<\frac{1}{j}-\frac{\varepsilon_{j}}{1+\varepsilon_{j}}\int_{X^{\prime}}\varphi\;,
∫Wφj=11+εj​∫Wψj<−j2,\int_{W}\varphi_{j}=\frac{1}{1+\varepsilon_{j}}\int_{W}\psi_{j}<-\frac{j}{2}\;,

for every irreducible component WW of XX where φ|W≡−∞\varphi\,|_{{}_{W}}\equiv-\infty. It follows that ψ=φ\psi=\varphi on XX and the proof of Theorem 2.2 is finished. □\Box

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.