ScalingStacks

Verified tagged author-source HTML · 0905.4718v1 · cited publication edition alignment unverified.

We now prove that K2≤Ct5/2K_{2}\leq\frac{C}{t^{5/2}}. To simplify the computation, we will use the notation

ℱ⁡(x)=ex​eB​σ−λ,\mathcal{F}(x)=e^{xe^{B\sigma^{-\lambda}}},

where xx is a real number, and we note here that ℱ\mathcal{F} is increasing. The starting point is a precise formula for Δω~t​𝒮\Delta_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}\mathcal{S}. This is just Yau’s C3C^{3} estimate [Y1], but without assuming that the metrics ω~t\tilde{\omega}_{t} and ωX\omega_{X} are equivalent, and it is done in a more general setting in [TWY] (see also [PSS]). With the notation of [TWY] we can write

𝒮=∑i,j,k|aj​ki|2.\mathcal{S}=\sum_{i,j,k}|a^{i}_{jk}|^{2}.

We then choose local unitary frames {θ1,…,θn}\{\theta^{1},\dots,\theta^{n}\} for ωX\omega_{X} and {θ~1,…,θ~n}\{\tilde{\theta}^{1},\dots,\tilde{\theta}^{n}\} for ω~t\tilde{\omega}_{t}, and write

θ~i=∑jaji​θj,\tilde{\theta}^{i}=\sum_{j}a^{i}_{j}\theta^{j},
θi=∑jbji​θ~j,\theta^{i}=\sum_{j}b^{i}_{j}\tilde{\theta}^{j},

for some local matrices of functions aji,bjia^{i}_{j},b^{i}_{j}. Notice that at any given point we can choose the frames and arrange that

(3.34) aji=λi​δji,a^{i}_{j}=\sqrt{\lambda_{i}}\delta^{i}_{j},
(3.35) bji=1λi​δji.b^{i}_{j}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\lambda_{i}}}\delta^{i}_{j}.

Then in our case [TWY, (4.3)] reads

(3.36) Δω~t​𝒮\displaystyle\Delta_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}\mathcal{S} ≥\displaystyle\geq 2​R​e​(ak​ℓi¯​(bkm​bℓq​bps¯​Rm​q​s¯j​ar​pi​ajr−aji​bℓq​bps¯​Rm​q​s¯j​ak​pr​brmCLOSECLOSE\displaystyle 2\mathrm{Re}\biggl(\overline{a^{i}_{k\ell}}\biggl(b^{m}_{k}b^{q}_{\ell}\overline{b^{s}_{p}}R^{j}_{mq\overline{s}}a^{i}_{rp}a^{r}_{j}-a^{i}_{j}b^{q}_{\ell}\overline{b^{s}_{p}}R^{j}_{mq\overline{s}}a^{r}_{kp}b^{m}_{r}
OPENOPEN−aji​bkm​bps¯​Rm​q​s¯j​aℓ​pr​brq+aji​bkm​bℓq​bps¯​bpu​Rm​q​s¯,uj)),\displaystyle\mbox{}-a^{i}_{j}b^{m}_{k}\overline{b^{s}_{p}}R^{j}_{mq\overline{s}}a^{r}_{\ell p}b^{q}_{r}+a^{i}_{j}b^{m}_{k}b^{q}_{\ell}\overline{b^{s}_{p}}b_{p}^{u}R^{j}_{mq\overline{s},u}\biggr)\biggr),

where we are summing over all indices, Rm​q​s¯jR^{j}_{mq\overline{s}} represents the curvature of ωX\omega_{X} and Rm​q​s¯,ujR^{j}_{mq\overline{s},u} its covariant derivative (with respect to ωX\omega_{X}). Since these are fixed tensors, we can use the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and (3.34), (3.35) to estimate the first term on the right hand side of (3.36) by

|2​Re​(ak​ℓi¯​bkm​bℓq​bps¯​Rm​q​s¯j​ar​pi​ajr)|≤C​∑i,k,ℓ,r,p|ak​ℓi​ar​pi|​λrλk​λℓ​λp≤C​(∑jλj)12​(∑q1λq)32​∑k,ℓ,r,p(∑i|ak​ℓi|2)12​(∑i|ar​pi|2)12=C​(trωX​ω~t)12​(trω~t​ωX)32​(∑i,k,ℓ|ak​ℓi|2)12​(∑i,r,p|ar​pi|2)12=C​𝒮​(trωX​ω~t)12​(trω~t​ωX)32.\begin{split}&\left|2\mathrm{Re}\left(\overline{a^{i}_{k\ell}}b^{m}_{k}b^{q}_{\ell}\overline{b^{s}_{p}}R^{j}_{mq\overline{s}}a^{i}_{rp}a^{r}_{j}\right)\right|\leq C\sum_{i,k,\ell,r,p}|a^{i}_{k\ell}a^{i}_{rp}|\sqrt{\frac{\lambda_{r}}{\lambda_{k}\lambda_{\ell}\lambda_{p}}}\\ &\leq C\left(\sum_{j}\lambda_{j}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}\left(\sum_{q}\frac{1}{\lambda_{q}}\right)^{\frac{3}{2}}\sum_{k,\ell,r,p}\left(\sum_{i}|a^{i}_{k\ell}|^{2}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}\left(\sum_{i}|a^{i}_{rp}|^{2}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}\\ &=C(\textrm{tr}_{\omega_{X}}\tilde{\omega}_{t})^{\frac{1}{2}}(\textrm{tr}_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}\omega_{X})^{\frac{3}{2}}\left(\sum_{i,k,\ell}|a^{i}_{k\ell}|^{2}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}\left(\sum_{i,r,p}|a^{i}_{rp}|^{2}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}\\ &=C\mathcal{S}(\textrm{tr}_{\omega_{X}}\tilde{\omega}_{t})^{\frac{1}{2}}(\textrm{tr}_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}\omega_{X})^{\frac{3}{2}}.\end{split}

The second and third term in (3.36) are estimated similarly, while the fourth term can be bounded by

|2​Re​(ak​ℓi¯​aji​bkm​bℓq​bps¯​bpu​Rm​q​s¯,uj)|≤C​∑i,k,ℓ,p|ak​ℓi|​λiλk​λℓ​λp2≤C​(∑jλj)12​(∑q1λq)2​∑i,k,ℓ|ak​ℓi|≤C​𝒮​(trωX​ω~t)12​(trω~t​ωX)2.\begin{split}&\left|2\mathrm{Re}\left(\overline{a^{i}_{k\ell}}a^{i}_{j}b^{m}_{k}b^{q}_{\ell}\overline{b^{s}_{p}}b_{p}^{u}R^{j}_{mq\overline{s},u}\right)\right|\leq C\sum_{i,k,\ell,p}|a^{i}_{k\ell}|\sqrt{\frac{\lambda_{i}}{\lambda_{k}\lambda_{\ell}\lambda_{p}^{2}}}\\ &\leq C\left(\sum_{j}\lambda_{j}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}\left(\sum_{q}\frac{1}{\lambda_{q}}\right)^{2}\sum_{i,k,\ell}|a^{i}_{k\ell}|\\ &\leq C\sqrt{\mathcal{S}}(\textrm{tr}_{\omega_{X}}\tilde{\omega}_{t})^{\frac{1}{2}}(\textrm{tr}_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}\omega_{X})^{2}.\end{split}

Overall we can estimate

(3.37) Δω~t​𝒮≥−C​𝒮​(trω~t​ωX)3/2​(trωX​ω~t)1/2−C​𝒮​(trω~t​ωX)2​(trωX​ω~t)1/2.\Delta_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}\mathcal{S}\geq-C\mathcal{S}(\textrm{tr}_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}\omega_{X})^{3/2}(\textrm{tr}_{\omega_{X}}\tilde{\omega}_{t})^{1/2}-C\sqrt{\mathcal{S}}(\textrm{tr}_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}\omega_{X})^{2}(\textrm{tr}_{\omega_{X}}\tilde{\omega}_{t})^{1/2}.

On the other hand from [TWY, Lemma 3.3] we see that

(3.38) Δω~t​trωX​ω~t=ak​ℓi​ap​ℓi¯​ajk​ajp¯+aji¯​ari​bℓq​bℓs¯​Rj​q​s¯r≥∑i,j,ℓ|aj​ℓi|2​λj−C​∑i,ℓλiλℓ≥(∑k1λk)−1​∑i,j,ℓ|aj​ℓi|2−C⁡(∑pλp)​(∑q1λq)=𝒮trω~t​ωX−C⁡(trω~t​ωX)​(trωX​ω~t).\begin{split}\Delta_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}\textrm{tr}_{\omega_{X}}\tilde{\omega}_{t}&=a^{i}_{k\ell}\overline{a^{i}_{p\ell}}a^{k}_{j}\overline{a^{p}_{j}}+\overline{a^{i}_{j}}a^{i}_{r}b^{q}_{\ell}\overline{b^{s}_{\ell}}R^{r}_{jq\overline{s}}\\ &\geq\sum_{i,j,\ell}|a^{i}_{j\ell}|^{2}\lambda_{j}-C\sum_{i,\ell}\frac{\lambda_{i}}{\lambda_{\ell}}\\ &\geq\left(\sum_{k}\frac{1}{\lambda_{k}}\right)^{-1}\sum_{i,j,\ell}|a^{i}_{j\ell}|^{2}-C\left(\sum_{p}\lambda_{p}\right)\left(\sum_{q}\frac{1}{\lambda_{q}}\right)\\ &=\frac{\mathcal{S}}{\textrm{tr}_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}\omega_{X}}-C(\textrm{tr}_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}\omega_{X})(\textrm{tr}_{\omega_{X}}\tilde{\omega}_{t}).\end{split}

We now insert (3.29), (3.30) in (3.37), (3.38) and get

(3.39) Δω~t​𝒮≥−C​ℱ​(2​C0)t3/2​𝒮−C​ℱ​(5​C0/2)t2​𝒮,\Delta_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}\mathcal{S}\geq-\frac{C\mathcal{F}(2C_{0})}{t^{3/2}}\mathcal{S}-\frac{C\mathcal{F}(5C_{0}/2)}{t^{2}}\sqrt{\mathcal{S}},
Δω~t​trωX​ω~t≥t​ℱ​(−C0)C​𝒮−C​ℱ​(2​C0)t.\Delta_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}\textrm{tr}_{\omega_{X}}\tilde{\omega}_{t}\geq\frac{t\mathcal{F}(-C_{0})}{C}\mathcal{S}-\frac{C\mathcal{F}(2C_{0})}{t}.

We then compute

(3.40) Δω~t​(ℱ⁡(3​C0)t5/2​trωX​ω~t)≥ℱ⁡(2​C0)C​t3/2​𝒮−C​ℱ​(5​C0)t7/2+2t5/2Re⟨∇ℱ(3C0),∇trωXω~t⟩ω~t+1t5/2​(trωX​ω~t)​Δω~t​ℱ​(3​C0),\begin{split}\Delta_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}\left(\frac{\mathcal{F}(3C_{0})}{t^{5/2}}\textrm{tr}_{\omega_{X}}\tilde{\omega}_{t}\right)&\geq\frac{\mathcal{F}(2C_{0})}{Ct^{3/2}}\mathcal{S}-\frac{C\mathcal{F}(5C_{0})}{t^{7/2}}\\ &+\frac{2}{t^{5/2}}\mathrm{Re}\langle\nabla\mathcal{F}(3C_{0}),\nabla\textrm{tr}_{\omega_{X}}\tilde{\omega}_{t}\rangle_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}\\ &+\frac{1}{t^{5/2}}(\textrm{tr}_{\omega_{X}}\tilde{\omega}_{t})\Delta_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}\mathcal{F}(3C_{0}),\end{split}

and estimate

Re⟨∇ℱ(3C0),∇trωXω~t⟩ω~t≥−|∇ℱ(3C0)|ω~t|∇trωXω~t|ω~t.\mathrm{Re}\langle\nabla\mathcal{F}(3C_{0}),\nabla\textrm{tr}_{\omega_{X}}\tilde{\omega}_{t}\rangle_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}\geq-|\nabla\mathcal{F}(3C_{0})|_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}|\nabla\textrm{tr}_{\omega_{X}}\tilde{\omega}_{t}|_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}.

Using [TWY, (3.20)] we see that

|∇trωXω~t|ω~t≤𝒮(trωXω~t).|\nabla\textrm{tr}_{\omega_{X}}\tilde{\omega}_{t}|_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}\leq\sqrt{\mathcal{S}}(\textrm{tr}_{\omega_{X}}\tilde{\omega}_{t}).

On the other hand a direct computation using (3.14) and (3.15) shows that there is a constant CC such that for any real number xx we have

|∇ℱ​(x)|ω~t≤C​ℱ​(x+1),|\nabla\mathcal{F}(x)|_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}\leq C\mathcal{F}(x+1),
|Δω~t​ℱ​(x)|≤C​ℱ​(x+1),|\Delta_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}\mathcal{F}(x)|\leq C\mathcal{F}(x+1),

and so we have

(3.41) Δω~t​(ℱ⁡(3​C0)t5/2​trωX​ω~t)≥ℱ⁡(2​C0)C​t3/2​𝒮−C​ℱ​(5​C0)t7/2−C​ℱ​(5​C0)t5/2​𝒮−C​ℱ​(5​C0)t5/2.\begin{split}\Delta_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}\left(\frac{\mathcal{F}(3C_{0})}{t^{5/2}}\textrm{tr}_{\omega_{X}}\tilde{\omega}_{t}\right)&\geq\frac{\mathcal{F}(2C_{0})}{Ct^{3/2}}\mathcal{S}-\frac{C\mathcal{F}(5C_{0})}{t^{7/2}}-\frac{C\mathcal{F}(5C_{0})}{t^{5/2}}\sqrt{\mathcal{S}}\\ &-\frac{C\mathcal{F}(5C_{0})}{t^{5/2}}.\end{split}

This and (3.39) give

Δω~t​(𝒮+C​ℱ​(3​C0)t5/2​trωX​ω~t)≥ℱ⁡(2​C0)t3/2​𝒮−C​ℱ​(5​C0/2)t2​𝒮−C​ℱ​(5​C0)t7/2−C​ℱ​(5​C0)t5/2​𝒮−C​ℱ​(5​C0)t5/2≥ℱ⁡(2​C0)t3/2​𝒮−C​ℱ​(5​C0)t7/2−C​ℱ​(5​C0)t5/2​𝒮,\begin{split}\Delta_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}\left(\mathcal{S}+\frac{C\mathcal{F}(3C_{0})}{t^{5/2}}\textrm{tr}_{\omega_{X}}\tilde{\omega}_{t}\right)&\geq\frac{\mathcal{F}(2C_{0})}{t^{3/2}}\mathcal{S}-\frac{C\mathcal{F}(5C_{0}/2)}{t^{2}}\sqrt{\mathcal{S}}\\ &-\frac{C\mathcal{F}(5C_{0})}{t^{7/2}}-\frac{C\mathcal{F}(5C_{0})}{t^{5/2}}\sqrt{\mathcal{S}}-\frac{C\mathcal{F}(5C_{0})}{t^{5/2}}\\ &\geq\frac{\mathcal{F}(2C_{0})}{t^{3/2}}\mathcal{S}-\frac{C\mathcal{F}(5C_{0})}{t^{7/2}}-\frac{C\mathcal{F}(5C_{0})}{t^{5/2}}\sqrt{\mathcal{S}},\end{split}

and

(3.42) Δω~t​K2≥ℱ⁡(−A)​(ℱ⁡(2​C0)t3/2​𝒮−C​ℱ​(5​C0)t7/2−C​ℱ​(5​C0)t5/2​𝒮CLOSEOPEN−C​ℱ​(1)​𝒮−C​ℱ​(4​C0+1)t5/2)+2​ℱ​(A)​Re​⟨∇K2,∇ℱ​(−A)⟩ω~t≥ℱ⁡(−A)​(ℱ⁡(2​C0)C​t3/2​𝒮−C​ℱ​(5​C0)t7/2−C​ℱ​(5​C0)t5/2​𝒮)+2​ℱ​(A)​Re​⟨∇K2,∇ℱ​(−A)⟩ω~t.\begin{split}\Delta_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}K_{2}&\geq\mathcal{F}(-A)\biggl(\frac{\mathcal{F}(2C_{0})}{t^{3/2}}\mathcal{S}-\frac{C\mathcal{F}(5C_{0})}{t^{7/2}}-\frac{C\mathcal{F}(5C_{0})}{t^{5/2}}\sqrt{\mathcal{S}}\\ &-C\mathcal{F}(1)\mathcal{S}-\frac{C\mathcal{F}(4C_{0}+1)}{t^{5/2}}\biggr)+2\mathcal{F}(A)\mathrm{Re}\langle\nabla K_{2},\nabla\mathcal{F}(-A)\rangle_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}\\ &\geq\mathcal{F}(-A)\biggl(\frac{\mathcal{F}(2C_{0})}{Ct^{3/2}}\mathcal{S}-\frac{C\mathcal{F}(5C_{0})}{t^{7/2}}-\frac{C\mathcal{F}(5C_{0})}{t^{5/2}}\sqrt{\mathcal{S}}\biggr)\\ &+2\mathcal{F}(A)\mathrm{Re}\langle\nabla K_{2},\nabla\mathcal{F}(-A)\rangle_{\tilde{\omega}_{t}}.\end{split}

At the maximum of K2K_{2} we then get

𝒮≤C​ℱ​(3​C0)t​𝒮+C​ℱ​(3​C0)t2,\mathcal{S}\leq\frac{C\mathcal{F}(3C_{0})}{t}\sqrt{\mathcal{S}}+\frac{C\mathcal{F}(3C_{0})}{t^{2}},

which implies that

𝒮≤C​ℱ​(6​C0)t2,\mathcal{S}\leq\frac{C\mathcal{F}(6C_{0})}{t^{2}},

and so

K2=ℱ⁡(−A)​(𝒮+C​ℱ​(3​C0)t5/2​trωX​ω~t)≤ℱ⁡(−A)​C​ℱ​(6​C0)t5/2≤Ct5/2,K_{2}=\mathcal{F}(-A)\left(\mathcal{S}+\frac{C\mathcal{F}(3C_{0})}{t^{5/2}}\textrm{tr}_{\omega_{X}}\tilde{\omega}_{t}\right)\leq\mathcal{F}(-A)\frac{C\mathcal{F}(6C_{0})}{t^{5/2}}\leq\frac{C}{t^{5/2}},

if we choose A≥6​C0A\geq 6C_{0}. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.